• Edelman信任指数
    Yes, AI Is Really Impacting The Job Market. Here’s What To Do. Josh Bersin 在 2025 年末指出,美国就业市场正在出现结构性变化。整体失业率上升至 4.6%,其中应届大学毕业生的失业率接近 10%,成为最受冲击的群体。与此同时,不要求大学学历的岗位持续增长,一线员工的重要性正在被重新定义。更值得关注的是信任问题。Edelman 调研显示,70% 的员工不信任企业关于 AI 裁员的说法,只有 27% 信任 CEO。AI 不只是技术工具,而是一场社会与组织层面的转型。Josh Bersin 强调,AI 并非消灭岗位,而是放大能力。真正的挑战在于,企业是否愿意投资年轻人才,是否能用透明沟通化解 AI 焦虑。 详细来看 All year I’ve been studying the employment data and talking with press about the smallish impact of AI on the job market. Most of the slowdown in US jobs, from my data and conversations, has been driven by cost-cutting and general economic uncertainty, not explicit AI job replacement. Well going into 2026 the situation is changing. The US unemployment rate is now 4.6%, up from 4.2% one year ago  (a 9.5% increase) and 3.7% in November of 2023 (a 24.7% increase in two years). These are significant increases, especially considering that unemployment was 3.6% in November of 2022. This tells me that the US economy is slowing after the post-pandemic “revenge buying” frenzy of 2021 and 2022. And of course US tariffs, inflation, and relatively high interest rates all contribute. But now let’s look under the covers and break out unemployment into two sub-groups: new college graduates (24 years and younger), and more seasoned workers (age 25-35). Suddenly you see a divergence. The green line, tenured college graduates, shows a steady unemployment rate below the average. This makes sense: these are experienced employees with skills, judgement, and seasoned decision-making maturity. The orange line, new college graduates, is trending upward. In fact right now it’s almost 10%, which is the highest it has been since July 2021, the peak recovery from the pandemic. Looking backwards, the only time young college grad unemployment was this high was in 2011, a period of recovery from the 2008 recession. (St. Louis Fed agrees.) And by the way, to round this out, jobs that do not require a degree are plentiful, roughly 82% of the workforce (up from 79% five years ago). So AI is not only slowing new college grad hiring, it’s also reducing the total number of jobs that require college. There are three important things happening here: First, whether it’s correct or not, employers are slowing down entry level hiring. Companies hire new college grads for many reasons (largely for talent pipeline), and many newly minted grads are far more AI-ready than we are. Despite this, it appears to economists that it’s harder than ever for these young folks to compete, so they need to “sell” their AI readiness and learning capacity. Second, the frontline workforce is becoming much more important. The general automation of white collar work (it’s still early days) and the explosion of jobs in healthcare, social services, retail, repair, entertainment and distribution are making the “college grad” part of the workforce relatively smaller. That’s not to say the money isn’t good, but as a CEO or leader more and more of your energy has to go into supporting these frontline workers. (Read our Frontline-First research for more.) Third, employees don’t trust CEO talk about jobs. A new study by Edelman shows a massive lack of people’s trust in business leaders (and AI scientists) around AI. This 5,000+ worker survey found that 70% of US workers do not trust statements about AI job reductions. When asked “who you do trust” only 27% of US workers trust the CEO. So we, as leaders, have a trust problem. Here’s the trust data, and this is all about “Trust in AI’s Value” not “trust in the AI platform.” AI Is a Socio-Technological Innovation As I talked about in this week’s podcast, AI is “socio-technological.” It has many societal and sociological impacts. If only half your employees believe what leaders are telling them, they’re going to hold back, grumble, and resist change. This is why economic insecurity is high: people are concerned about their jobs, careers, and future earnings. (So AI anxiety could actually lower economic productivity!) The solution to this is not to ignore the topic, but rather to discuss it openly. None of us really know how much impact AI will have (I do know most platforms over-sell its value right now), and AI is a little scary. We have to get comfortable with phones that talk back to us, creepy emails that know our name, avatar-based job interviews, AI-driven career advice, and AI-informed performance reviews. And in 2026 we’re going to see  digital twins, robots, and more real-life animations of people at work. (Galileo Learn uses a “Josh Agent” to coach and challenge you as you learn.) Here’s my advice. If you’re holding back on entry-level hiring you may be making a mistake. Younger staff, who have lived with this technology for more of their lives, are likely to be the ones to most quickly use AI, build with AI, and innovate with its new applications. People who are tenured tend to see new tools as a way to “speed up what they know how to do.” New employees might just say “why not do it this way?” and bring you the reinvention you need. Everyone Has The Opportunity To Be A Superworker Now AI is not a job killer, it’s a big job-leveler. You, as a younger worker, have access to information and research which was often hoarded by experts. If you’re willing to roll up your sleeves, you can move from “apprentice” to “newly minted expert” quickly. And if you’re looking for a job there’s no excuse for not becoming an expert on the company before you talk with a recruiter. For senior, more tenured people the same applies. You can’t rely on your experience alone any more: you, too, should be digging in and learning about new technologies, tools, and advancements in your domain. Employers: Be Careful How You Think For hiring managers and executives, beware of the “tenure trap” above. Just because a senior person knows your business better, you may find that the young “AI-Guru” right out of college catches up fast. Remember, tenured people may see AI as a way to “do things the old way faster” rather than “rethink the way we work.” For HR leaders and recruiters, remember one thing. Younger workers may learn faster and ultimately improve productivity at a faster rate (plus they cost less). If you seek out fast-learning AI pioneers they could be your Superworkers of the future. And for CEOs and other execs, be honest and thoughtful about your plans. All our research points to AI as a “scaling technology,” not one to “eliminate jobs.” The more honest and supportive you are, the faster your employees will adapt and help your company stay ahead.
    Edelman信任指数
    2025年12月22日
  • Edelman信任指数
    AI时代的招聘攻略: 2026年美国的五大招聘趋势 AI 已全面进入招聘流程,87% 的招聘团队和 67% 的候选人都在用AI,带来前所未有的效率与信息过载。劳动力市场继续分化,蓝领与医疗持续缺人,白领岗位需求疲软;AI技能岗位快速增长。候选人对雇主信任度下降,仅67%信任雇主,他们会通过社交媒体和AI“事实核查”企业文化。70% 的求职从Google开始,86% 通过社交平台查岗,招聘正在转向“搜索+社交”主导的精准营销模式。科技不是为了减少沟通,而是帮助HR把更多时间用于高质量的候选人互动。这些趋势将深刻影响2026年的招聘策略。 新常态已至 人才招聘团队正面临着一系列日益严峻的挑战:高利率、关税不确定性和更严格的移民政策共同带来了持续的经济压力,招聘步伐普遍放缓,而人工智能则已从前沿“炒作”迅速转变为日常“习惯”。这些因素在2026年将进一步加速,巩固了我们当前所处的“新常态”。但这并非危机,而是一个孕育创新方法的机遇。本文将深入探讨塑造未来一年招聘格局的五大关键趋势。 1. AI军备竞赛:效率与挑战并存 人工智能已全面进入主流,深刻改变了招聘的攻守双方。数据显示,高达87%的人才招聘决策者和67%的求职者正在积极使用AI工具。招聘官利用AI撰写职位描述、总结简历和生成面试问题;而求职者则用它来研究公司、比较薪酬并为特定职位量身定制简历。 这种双向应用带来了一个全新的挑战:招聘渠道中充斥着大量经由AI润色、内容高度相似的简历,这使得识别真正具备所述技能的合格候选人变得异常困难。这一局面不仅在技术供应商之间引发了一场提供更优筛选工具的“军备竞赛”,也促使雇主们迫切地需要采纳更先进的AI解决方案以保持竞争力。 更具变革性的是,人工智能正在重塑求职者发现工作的方式。我们正见证“提示词搜索”(prompt-based searching)的兴起。想象一下,求职者不再是在谷歌上搜索“我附近的仓库工作”,而是向ChatGPT这样的工具输入:“我是一名42岁的仓库工人,正在克利夫兰寻找一份每周站立工作时间少于30小时的职位。我有叉车安全认证,并且只希望在周二到周六工作。”生成式AI将返回高度定制化的职位推荐。这种对话式的求职体验正成为新常态,促使雇主必须升级其招聘网站以适应这一趋势。 “人才招聘团队正面临双重挤压——人手减少,资金缩减,同时还要承受展示如何有效利用人工智能的巨大压力。” —— Matt Plummer,Appcast首席产品官 2. 劳动力市场分化:冰火两重天 2026年的劳动力市场将呈现出日益加剧的分化。整体就业增长放缓,失业率已攀升至4.3%,创下自2021年以来的新高。市场内部的差异尤为显著,这在很大程度上是由特定的经济政策驱动的: 体力劳动岗位(“Standing-up” jobs): 熟练技工、农业、建筑业和医疗保健等岗位面临着持续的劳动力短缺。更严格的移民政策导致依赖外国出生工人的行业劳动力池萎缩,加剧了招聘困难。 白领岗位(“Sitting-down” jobs): 市场营销、人力资源和专业服务等岗位的需求持续疲软。关税政策增加了商品生产行业的成本,抑制了消费者需求,从而导致相关领域的企业缩减招聘目标。 在整体降温的市场中,医疗保健行业一直是就业增长的“主力军”,但其前景也面临不确定性。联邦医疗补助(Medicaid)的大幅削减可能威胁到数十万个直接和间接的医疗岗位。与此同时,一场围绕AI人才的激烈争夺战正在上演。与AI技能相关的职位发布量在过去18个月里翻了一倍多,薪酬也大幅飙升,成为冷却经济中的一个显著亮点。 “2026年的情况将与今年非常相似,但挑战会更加严峻。由于移民政策,招聘体力劳动者将变得更难;而对于白领岗位,需求低迷和招聘目标缩减的状况可能会持续。” —— Andrew Flowers,Appcast首席经济学家 3. 雇主品牌危机:信任跌至谷底 求职者对雇主的信任度正在急剧下降。根据爱德曼(Edelman)的信任度调查报告,公众对雇主“做正确的事”的信任度在该研究的26年历史上首次出现下滑。普华永道(PwC)的调查数据也揭示了巨大的认知鸿沟:只有67%的员工信任他们的雇主,而高达86%的领导者却认为自己深受信任。 如今的求职者对企业的宣传信息持高度怀疑态度,68%的人认为商界领袖会故意误导公众。他们利用AI和社交媒体来核实雇主的说法,并与员工的真实体验(如社交媒体上的帖子)进行比对。其结果是,“企业承诺”已失去效力。求职者,特别是Z世代,需要的是证明公司言行一致的“具体证据”,他们希望公司在气候变化、心理健康、多元化、公平与包容等重大社会议题上有明确的立场和行动。此外,由于对人工智能取代工作的担忧和普遍的经济不安全感,员工们更倾向于“抱紧工作”(job hugging),将职业稳定性放在首位。 “你不能只说‘我们关心你’。求职者辨别谎言的能力非常强,过度修饰的语言现在听起来就像空话。重要的是能够拿出证据,证明你言行一致。” —— Erika Boutain,Appcast雇主品牌策略师 4. 招聘即营销:在搜索与社交中触达人才 招聘官必须主动去到求职者聚集的地方。数据显示,70%的求职搜索始于谷歌,而86%的求职者会在求职过程中使用社交媒体。这意味着招聘策略必须全面转向数字化平台,主要通过两种方式触达人才: 社交广告: 触达那些可能对合适机会持开放态度的被动求职者,在他们日常浏览信息流时建立品牌认知。 付费搜索广告: 精准定位那些正在积极寻找相关职位、意向明确的主动求职者。 成功的关键在于由AI驱动的超个性化技术。这种技术摒弃了传统的“广撒网”模式,转而采用类似电子商务的精细化运营。它能够分析候选人的在线行为和社交媒体信号,预测他们可能感兴趣的职位类型以及薪酬、福利、灵活性等关键决策因素,最终实现像“Netflix风格的职位推荐引擎”那样的精准匹配。这不仅优化了广告支出,也显著提高了申请转化率。 “人工智能与行为定位的结合,正在帮助我们探索新的方式,将求职者与符合其兴趣的职位联系起来,并简化他们与工作机会的互动过程。” —— Alexandra Horwitt Anema,Appcast数字媒体总监 5. 回归人性化:用技术解放招聘官 技术的最终目标不是取代人类,而是增强人类的能力。数据显示,72%的人才招聘领导者乐观地认为,AI将让他们能够更专注于工作中‘人性化’的一面;同时,78%的领导者相信AI工具将使他们更有效率。 面对AI驱动下激增的申请量,理想的工作流程是:让AI处理海量的、重复性的任务,如简历初筛、候选人排序和面试安排。这使得招聘官能够解放出来,专注于更高价值的活动,例如深入评估候选人的实际能力、探讨文化契合度以及与顶尖人才建立稳固的关系。前瞻性的人才团队正在构建一种**“人工参与更少,但整体互动体验更佳”**的工作模式。这种人机协作不仅提高了效率,也为所有求职者(而不仅仅是最终被录用者)带来了更优质、更透明的体验。 “我们将加倍投入技术,以带回招聘中至关重要的人性化元素。” —— Matt Plummer,Appcast首席产品官 结论:拥抱变革 2026年是人才招聘团队重新思考长期流程、重塑战略的一年。成功的关键在于平衡AI驱动的效率与定义卓越招聘所必需的人性化关怀。我们仍处于探索阶段,最好的策略是大胆试验、衡量一切,并支持那些被证明有价值的投入。那些保持好奇心并对变革持开放态度的人,将定义2026年及未来的招聘成功。 最终,正如Appcast首席执行官Matt Molinari所指出的:“拥抱变革的人和公司将成为赢家。”
    Edelman信任指数
    2025年12月04日
订阅NACSHR周报
HR Jobs
热门文章
扫一扫 添加客服