• employee rights
    从“禁用机器人上司”到“人机共治”:加州 SB 7 将如何重塑用工 AI 合规版图 加州通过“No Robo Bosses Act”(SB 7),加州州长需在 10 月 12 日前决定是否签署。一旦生效,该法案将于 2026 年 1 月 1 日实施,全面规范 AI 在就业决策中的使用。主要条款包括:雇主不得仅依赖 AI 作出纪律、解雇或停用决定;若主要依赖 AI,必须有人工复核;使用前至少提前 30 天通知员工,并在解雇时单独告知;员工每年有权申请一次相关数据。违规将面临 500 美元/次罚款。这项立法被视为全球首个系统性 AI 职场监管案例,为员工提供更高透明度与数据权利。 以下是正文,供参考: 加州立法机构已通过被称为“No Robo Bosses Act”的 SB 7,并送交州长审议。按照加州官方立法日程,州长需在 2025 年 10 月 12 日前签署或否决该法案;若签署,新法自 2026 年 1 月 1 日起生效。这部全美首创的就业 AI 专法,以“通知—限制—监督—救济”为主线,覆盖从招聘到解雇的几乎全部“就业相关决策”,并在“纪律、解雇或停用”等高风险场景强制引入实质性人工复核。 一、SB 7 到底规范了什么? 关键定义与适用范围 自动化决策系统(ADS):凡是由机器学习、统计建模、数据分析或 AI 组成、输出“评分/分类/推荐”等简化结果、用来辅助或替代人的自由裁量、并对自然人产生实质性影响的计算过程,均被纳入。 就业相关决策:范围极广,几乎涵盖工资、福利、工作时长/班次、绩效、招聘、纪律、晋升、解雇、任务/技能要求、工作分配、培训与机会获取、生产率要求、健康与安全等。 工人(Worker):不仅包括雇员,也包括向企业或政府实体提供服务的独立承包人。 “不能只靠机器”的红线 在纪律、解雇或“停用(deactivation)”决策中,雇主不得仅依赖 ADS。 若“主要依赖” ADS 输出作出上述决定,必须由人类复核者审阅 ADS 输出,并汇总与审查其他相关信息(如主管评估、人员档案、工作成果、同事评议、证人访谈/相关在线评价等)。 不得将客户评分作为唯一或主要输入数据用于就业决策。 二、四大通知义务 使用前通知(Pre-Use Notice) 部署前至少 30 天向将被直接影响的工人发出书面通知;若法律生效时已在用,最迟 2026 年 4 月 1 日完成补通知;新入职者在入职 30 天内告知。 招聘场景:对使用 ADS 的岗位,需在收到申请时或在岗位公告中告知。内容包括:受影响的决策类型、输入数据类别与来源及采集方式、已知会导致输出偏差的关键参数、ADS 创建方、工人数据访问/更正权利、配额说明(如适用)、反报复声明等。 使用后通知(Post-Use Notice) 若在纪律、解雇或停用中“主要依赖 ADS”,在告知该决定的同时,还须向员工发出独立书面通知:说明可联系的人与数据获取方式,表明使用了 ADS,员工有权请求其被使用的数据,并重申反报复。 三、数据权利与合规底线 员工每 12 个月可申请一次,获取过去 12 个月在“主要依赖 ADS”的纪律/解雇/停用决策中所使用的本人数据(提供时须匿名化他人信息)。 禁止性使用:不得用 ADS 违反劳动/民权/安健等法律;不得推断受保护身份;不得围绕未披露目的收集工人数据;不得针对行使权利者进行画像/预测/不利行动。 四、执行与责任 执法机关:加州劳动专员主责,可调查、发临时救济、开具传票与罚单并提起民事诉讼;地方检察官也可起诉。 罚则:每次违规 500 美元民事罚款(可累计)。法案同时禁止对行使权利的员工实施任何形式的报复。 生效与时点:2025 年 10 月 12 日为州长签署/否决截止日期;2026 年 1 月 1 日起生效(若签署)。 五、与其他法律的交互作用 与 CCPA/CPPA 的衔接:若企业受《加州消费者隐私法》及加州隐私保护局关于自动化决策技术的隐私规则约束,则仍须遵守相应隐私规。 工会豁免:若有效的集体谈判协议中明确豁免 SB 7,并对工资/工时/工况与算法管理保护有清晰规定,则在该覆盖范围内不适用。 地方更高标准:SB 7 不排斥提供等同或更高保护的地方法规。 六、难点与灰区 “主要依赖”如何判定? 法律未给百分比或权重阈值,复核是否实质有效而非走过场,将依赖执法与判例。 通知与数据工作量 多系统、多岗位、多轮通知加数据留存,意味着 HR、法务与 IT 协作成本显著上升。 客户评分的边界 “不得作为唯一或主要输入”的要求,将迫使零售、外卖、平台经济等行业调整绩效与纪律模型。 七、横向对比:其他地区的经验 纽约市 Local Law 144:要求使用自动就业决策工具(AEDT)的企业进行年度偏见审计,并将结果公开,同时在招聘/评估阶段告知候选人和员工。 科罗拉多州 SB 24-205:对“高风险 AI”规定开发者和部署者的合理注意义务,要求进行影响评估,并建立申诉与数据更正路径,将于 2026 年 2 月 1 日生效。 欧盟 AI 法案:采取风险分级监管模式,高风险系统必须建立合规体系,并开展基本权利影响评估(FRIA),监管覆盖就业、教育、金融等多个场景。 八、企业实操路线图 盘点与评估 列出所有 ADS 使用点(招聘、绩效、排班、监控、培训等)。 识别纪律/解雇/停用链路中是否存在“主要依赖”。 审查 AI 供应商合同,确保披露必要数据来源与偏置参数。 通知与数据管理 建立前置通知、后置通知模板,并完成 2026 年 4 月 1 日前的补通知。 建立数据台账,支持员工数据申请与匿名化处理。 培训与演练 培训人类复核者,明确复核标准和证据清单。 建立纪律/解雇/停用的双轨记录机制,确保合规。 九、场景演练:门店一线员工“低评分解雇” 错误做法:直接将顾客星级评价作为主要依据触发解雇。合规做法: 将客户评分作为辅证。 由人类复核者调取主管评估、档案、工作样本、同事/证人意见等。 在决定同时发出后置通知,说明联系人、ADS 介入情况与数据申请权利。 十、对 HR 科技与供应链的影响 产品设计将更重视:通知生成器、人类复核工作台、数据取证与匿名化导出、偏置敏感参数标注等功能。 商业条款倾向:在 SLA 中加入合规配合、日志可提取性、异常暂停条款,对高风险场景的责任分配更加谨慎。 十一、编辑部点评 SB 7 的真正创新点不在于偏见审计或宏观风险分级,而在于直接规定:高风险就业决策必须有人类复核。这一行为导向+流程内嵌的模式,预示着企业 HR 管理将进入“人机共治”的新阶段。难点在于如何界定“主要依赖”与如何确保“复核质量”。未来数年,这些模糊地带将决定 SB 7 在实践中的实际效果。 关键信息与来源 加州议会法案文本:SB 7 Employment: automated decision systems 加州立法日程:2025 年 10 月 12 日为州长签署/否决截止日期,2026 年 1 月 1 日生效(若签署) 相关法规:纽约市 Local Law 144、科罗拉多州 SB 24-205、欧盟 AI 法案
    employee rights
    2025年09月23日
  • employee rights
    How California Employees Can Navigate Conflict & Respond to Workplace Aggression 在加州职场,冲突虽常见,但若升级为言语、心理或身体上的攻击,员工权益和安全便受到严重威胁。本文由加州资深劳动律师 Andrea Amaya 撰写,结合丰富实务经验,为员工提供一套应对职场侵害的法律行动指南。 首先,员工需识别何为“正常摩擦”与“侵害行为”之间的界限——如果对方的行为使你感到受威胁、被羞辱、被排挤,或影响工作绩效,就不应被视为“职场常态”。其次,律师强调“记录一切”的重要性,即便是微小的不适也应及时整理证据,如保存邮件、截图聊天记录,并建立日志。 面对挑衅时,理性、专业的回应比情绪化反应更具保护力。文章建议使用明确措辞维护自身底线,并在适当时向HR正式提出书面投诉。但员工也需意识到HR并非完全中立,举报时需谨慎、留存所有记录。如担心遭遇打击报复,建议先与律师沟通。 当局势持续恶化、损害身心健康时,员工应评估是否需要寻求法律援助或考虑离职。在加州,基于歧视、骚扰或报复的侵权可向 CRD 或 EEOC 提出申诉。 作者最后提醒,职场毒性文化的存在并非员工本人的失败,勇敢维权、优先保护自己的心理健康,是专业、成熟且有力的选择。 LOS ANGELES, July 15, 2025-Conflict is part of any workplace and often unavoidable. It can look like subtle disrespect in meetings or outright hostility behind closed doors.But when conflict escalates into aggression, whether it be verbal, psychological, or even physical, and it starts threatening your dignity, safety, and career, it stops being a mere HR matter. As an employment lawyer in California representing employees across industries, I've seen how workplace aggression, left unchecked, can erode mental health, derail careers, and silence otherwise brilliant voices. But I've also seen how clarity, strategy, and the courage to act can turn conflict into a turning point rather than a breaking point. Here's how California employees can navigate workplace conflict and respond to aggression in a way that's not only safe and smart, but legally informed. 1. Recognize the Difference Between Discomfort and Abuse Not every disagreement is "hostile work environment" material. Workplaces are made up of employees with differing opinions, personalities and backgrounds. Disagreements are bound to happen. However, there is a difference between a disagreement or a misunderstanding and a toxic work environment. Many workers, especially in hierarchical or high-pressure fields, normalize toxic dynamics. If you find yourself second-guessing whether your colleague's tone, your supervisor's "jokes," or the constant exclusion from meetings are just part of the job, pause. Ask yourself: Is this behavior isolating me, threatening me, humiliating me, or interfering with my ability to do my job? In California, workplace aggression can cross legal lines if it includes harassment (especially if based on protected characteristics like race, gender, age, disability, etc.) or retaliation (for reporting wrongdoing, requesting medical leave, etc.). It doesn't have to be physical. Verbal attacks, threats, and sabotage count. 2. Document Everything, Even the "Small" Stuff Legal cases aren't built on vibes; they're built on records. If a coworker publicly berates you, if your boss sends passive-aggressive emails, or if you're left out of key communications, write it down. Save the emails. Screenshot the thread. Keep a running log with dates, what happened, and who was present. Even if you never file a formal complaint, documentation arms you with clarity and credibility. It helps HR understand patterns, not just isolated events. And if things do escalate legally, it could be the difference between "he said, she said" and a compelling, evidence-based claim. 3. Respond Strategically, Not Emotionally It's human to want to snap back at the colleague who cuts you down in front of others. But emotional reactions can be used against you later, especially if the aggressor is angling to provoke you. Instead, respond with professionalism. If safe, call out the behavior calmly: "I'd prefer to be spoken to respectfully. Is there something specific you want to address?" If you're in a meeting, redirect the conversation or note the inappropriate behavior in writing afterward. Use phrases like: "To clarify what was said earlier…" "For the record, I'd like to note…" Standing up for yourself may feel uncomfortable, especially if you're junior or underrepresented, but it is a crucial step to protecting your dignity. Remember: assertiveness is not aggression. It's boundary-setting. 4. Use Your Company's Processes, But With Eyes Wide Open HR is supposed to be a neutral party, but in practice, they often serve the company's interests. That doesn't mean you shouldn't report bad behavior. It means you should report with awareness. When making a complaint: Be clear, specific, and factual. Stick to workplace impact (e.g., "This interfered with my ability to do X"). Ask for a written acknowledgment of your complaint. Save a copy of everything you submit or receive. In California, retaliation for complaining about unlawful behavior (discrimination, harassment, wage violations, etc.) is itself illegal. Nonetheless, retaliation by an employer is still common. If you're concerned about blowback, consult an employment lawyer before filing the complaint. 5. Know When to Escalate, And When to Exit There comes a point when the question shifts from "Can I fix this?" to "Is this worth staying in?" That's not quitting. That's choosing yourself. If conflict or aggression becomes chronic, or harmful to your health, or it remains unresolved, it may be time to seek outside help. In some cases, a legal letter can prompt change. In others, a claim with the California Civil Rights Department (CRD) or Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC) may be appropriate. And sometimes, the bravest and healthiest move is to walk away, with your records intact, your self-respect preserved, and legal options open. This doesn't mean you are giving up. You are simply prioritizing your mental and physical health. You are not unprofessional for protecting your peace. And you are not alone. Take action. Final Thoughts If you're dealing with constant tension or subtle hostility, it's easy to internalize it as a personal failure. But much of what we call "personality conflicts" in the workplace is actually a failure of culture and leadership. Especially for employees from marginalized communities, navigating workplace aggression can feel like an invisible second job. Recognize when a situation is harmful. Leaving a workplace that no longer suits you is not a sign of weakness. While workplace aggression can make you feel powerless, remember that you have the power to control the outcome. You don't need to be loud to stand up for yourself. You just need to be strategic, supported, and unshakably clear on your worth. The law, when understood and applied, is a powerful ally. Contact D.Law by calling (818) 875-2008 or send a message with any questions or concerns you may have regarding your employment rights. Our attorneys are experts in California employment law and worker's rights and can help you with the problems you are faced with.   -By Andrea Amaya, Associate Attorney, D.Law
    employee rights
    2025年07月15日
  • employee rights
    Trends in Employment Law Employers Should be Aware of With 2023 here, it’s time to look ahead to key issues affecting employers in the coming year. Notably, these issues share a major driver: remote and hybrid work models. Here’s a peek at top labour and employment law trends for employers to watch out for in 2023. Changes in the labour laws will continue to impact many workplace practices, including vaccination requirements, hybrid and remote work, travel restrictions, and ensuring workers with underserved opportunities can access the labour market. These inquiries will require outside labour attorneys and in-house legal counsel to answer and comprehend. As the area of labour and employment law develops over the coming years, employers must take into account the following trends. Quelling Quiet Quitting: On social media, the idea of quiet quitting—where a person continues to work but ceases to go above and beyond, performing only what is officially required—has received a lot of attention. Employers are starting to face a serious problem as workers place more value on the "life" component of the work-life balance equation. Employers are also attempting to determine what, if anything, can be done about it. The good news is that employers have resources at their disposal to combat quiet resignation, such as: Written employment contracts: Employee rights, obligations, and expectations will be made plain to employees through a well-crafted and effectively implemented written employment contract that includes explicit terms regarding work assignments, working hours, and pay. This document may also grant the authority to terminate an employee if they fail to uphold those conditions. Incentive compensation: Offering incentives to employees for exceeding performance goals, such as bonuses, paid time off, or other rewards, may encourage them to put in the extra effort. However, it's crucial to carefully craft incentive plans to avoid future liability for them even after the employment relationship has ended. "When there is a fierce talent competition, a voluntary “disconnecting from work” policy that is (well-drafted and effectively administered) sends a message to both present and potential employees that an employer is eager to help workers balance their home and work life." Job satisfaction: Consider ways to improve job satisfaction, which is less of a legal concern than an engagement one. For instance, refusing to offer remote work opportunities can induce disengagement, which in turn can lead to employee dissatisfaction. Employers have the authority to determine an employee's place of employment. So, take into account the model that will benefit the staff and the company equally. Progressive discipline: While employers have the right to control the workplace, they can only expect adequate - not exceptional - performances from their employees. If an employee's performance falls below a certain threshold, the employer may gradually penalise the employee for poor performance and, ultimately, terminate their employment. However, companies always have the option to fire employees without cause as long as they receive the proper amount of notice or compensation. Demands to Disconnect: Employee requests for more flexibility have led to the retention of remote and hybrid work arrangements post-pandemic, which has led to rising employee demands for a "right to disconnect." Employees' "right to disconnect" often refers to their decision to disengage from communication about their jobs post-working hours. Employers may decide to implement a voluntary "disconnecting from work" policy as a recruitment and retention strategy even if they are not legally compelled to do so. Due to COVID-19, a lot of employers have switched to a hybrid or remote work model, which has caused the distinction between personal and professional lives to become hazier. When there is a fierce talent competition, a voluntary "disconnecting from work" policy that is (well-drafted and effectively administered) sends a message to both present and potential employees that an employer is eager to help workers balance their home and work life. More Employee Monitoring: With remote or hybrid work arrangements becoming more prevalent, employers are exploring how to monitor employees generally and remote workers specifically. Maintaining compliance with all federal and state labour laws and regulations is integral to running a business. In addition to being among the easiest to violate, labour and employment regulations are also among the most important. SOURCE Manage HR
    employee rights
    2024年01月21日