• Global Payroll
    颠覆认知:全球劳动力报告揭示的5个反直觉趋势 当今的商业领袖和人力资源专家正面临一个前所未有的挑战:如何在全球范围内高效、合规地管理日益分散的团队?随着全球化团队的兴起,管理的复杂性呈指数级增长,旧有的模式正在失效。我们似乎都认为,更大的人力资源团队、更多的工具和更严格的控制是唯一的出路。 然而,Remote发布的《2025年全球劳动力报告》揭示了一些关于人力资源、技术和全球招聘的惊人真相,其中许多发现甚至与我们的直觉背道而驰。这份报告基于对10个国家的3,650名人力资源和商业领袖的调研,为我们描绘了一幅截然不同的未来工作图景。 本文将为您提炼出其中最关键的五个发现。准备好,这些洞察可能会彻底改变你对未来工作的看法,并为你的组织战略提供新的方向。 1. “精简人力资源”并非资源不足,而是一种新式超能力 传统观念认为,管理庞大的全球员工队伍需要一个同样庞大的人力资源部门。但数据显示,事实恰恰相反。小型人力资源团队(即使只有1-3人)在员工体验和留任率等关键指标上的表现,与大型团队相当,甚至更好。这并非偶然。 报告中的一个关键数据显示,**87%**的受访公司的人力资源或招聘团队规模不超过九人。这些精简的团队之所以能爆发出惊人的能量,其背后的秘密在于技术。他们正通过采用集成式全球人力资源平台、人工智能和自动化等创新工具,巧妙地实现了“以少胜多”。这些技术使他们能够轻松处理跨国薪酬、合规和员工体验等复杂事务,从而在全球舞台上产生巨大的影响力。 “随着公司在全球范围内的扩张,员工的敬业度和留任率不能靠运气。数据显示,业务表现与我们在增长过程中为员工提供支持的程度直接相关。那些无论在哪个地区都优先考虑文化和发展一致性的人力资源领导者,将能保持发展势能并留住顶尖人才。” Barbara Matthews Chief People Officer at Remote 2. 全球人才库已非备选项,而是默认配置 在过去,国际招聘通常被视为一种补充策略。然而,如今的格局已发生根本性转变:全球招聘已迅速成为企业获取人才的默认选项。 这一转变的规模是惊人的。报告预测,到2026年,**73%**的领导者预计其超过一半的新员工将来自公司的主要国家之外。这一趋势背后的主要驱动力是本地人才的稀缺——74%65%29%。然而,即使是较为谨慎的市场也显示出加速的迹象,法国计划中的国际招聘比例将在未来数月从29%上升至38%。 3. 人人都对全球合规充满信心——然而几乎人人都曾失败 在处理复杂的国际劳动法规时,信心是必不可少的,但过度的自信却可能是危险的。报告揭示了一个惊人的“信心差距”:一方面,高达**98%**的领导者对自己了解运营国家的法规充满信心。 但另一方面,现实却给了他们沉重一击:74%42,000美元,而其中31%50,000美元。这种信心与现实的巨大鸿沟,代表着全球扩张中最大的未管理财务风险之一,它将合规从一个法律复选框转变为财务规划的关键组成部分。 4. 人力资源领域的AI革命已至,但现实既混乱又棘手 人工智能无疑是人力资源领域最具变革潜力的技术。数据显示,**75%**的人力资源领导者预计,到2026年底,人工智能将处理超过一半的日常行政任务。这预示着一个更高效、更具战略性的未来。 然而,通往未来的道路并非一帆风顺。当前的现实是一场快速而混乱的实验:在过去一年里,28%停止使用某个人工智能招聘工具,但几乎同等数量(27%)的团队则开始使用一款新的人工智能工具。与此同时,**21%**的团队发现了由人工智能生成且包含误导性或虚假信息的简历。这一系列数据表明,真正的机会不在于零散地采纳各种AI工具,而在于建立一个整合的、治理良好的智能平台。 5. 你的人力资源团队讨厌他们的软件(并且正积极寻求替代品) 认为人力资源团队正在与他们的技术栈作斗争,这并非凭空猜测,而是一个可量化的行业现实。报告明确指出,“工具泛滥”问题已让人力资源团队不堪重负。这种现象普遍存在,超过80%的人力资源团队需要同时操作2到5个独立的系统来管理核心职能。平均而言,每支团队需要使用3.6个工具,而**32%**的领导者认为“过多孤立的工具”是他们技术栈面临的首要挑战。 这种挫败感已经达到了临界点。一个最具说服力的数据是:**近九成(nearly 9/10)**的人力资源领导者表示,如果能获得一个集成了全球薪酬和合规功能的一体化平台,他们愿意立即替换掉现有的核心人力资源信息系统(HRIS)。这种对整合平台的压倒性需求,不仅仅是为了追求用户便利,它更是实现“精简人力资源”模式的根本推动力,使得小型团队能够在不按比例增加人手的情况下实现全球化运营。 结论:面向未来的思考 《2025年全球劳动力报告》清晰地描绘了一种新的运营现实:精简且依赖技术的人力资源团队,肩负着驾驭全球人才的重任,而这项使命正不断受到复杂法规、混乱的人工智能应用以及碎片化软件格局的考验。人力资源部门正从传统的行政角色,演变为技术驱动的战略推动者,但这一转变过程伴随着巨大的压力和前所未有的复杂性。 随着这些趋势的不断加速,真正的问题不再是你的组织是否会适应,而是能否足够快地适应。你的团队为这个新现实做好准备了吗?
    Global Payroll
    2025年11月06日
  • Global Payroll
    ADP Lyric HCM, The Next-Gen HR Platform Many Have Waited For Josh Bersin 写文章介绍了ADP的 Lyric HCM,给予了高度评价。ADP于2018年启动了一项秘密项目,目标是开发下一代企业人力资源管理平台。这个项目最终被命名为ADP Lyric HCM,它的设计旨在应对当代灵活多变的工作环境。Lyric HCM基于高度可扩展的微服务架构,能够处理包括全职、兼职、临时工、自由职业者等多种员工类型,同时支持多重管理结构。该平台具有灵活性,可帮助企业快速适应组织重组、兼并收购等变化,且能够实现全球薪资和税务管理,提供符合各地法律法规的自定义规则。 Lyric HCM的设计不仅注重系统的灵活性,还融入了大量的AI功能,使其在用户体验上更加智能化和易用。通过ADP Assist这一AI工具,用户可以通过自然语言与系统互动,轻松进行复杂的HR操作。此外,Lyric HCM还提供实时的行业基准数据,帮助企业根据最新的薪酬和岗位信息做出决策。该系统的“人本位”架构使其更具灵活性,相比传统以职位为基础的系统,它可以更好地满足当代企业多重任务、多角色管理的需求。 Lyric HCM不仅支持多种HR功能,如招聘、绩效管理、培训和发展,还拥有一个统一的员工体验平台,员工可以通过简单的查询完成例如婚假申请等事务。此外,ADP还建立了强大的全球服务团队,确保客户获得定制化的实施和长期支持。 自上线以来,ADP Lyric HCM已经吸引了超过120个大型客户,证明了其系统的稳定性和可扩展性。其核心市场定位是为全球化、分布式的企业提供服务,尤其是在零售、医疗保健、餐饮等行业。作为一款融合AI技术的全新平台,Lyric HCM展示了未来人力资源管理系统的潜力,并成为Workday、Oracle、SAP等主要HCM供应商的有力竞争对手。   In the Spring of 2018 I attended a confidential meeting in New York City to learn about a project called Lifion. ADP had hired a new team of engineers convened in a secret mission to build the “next-generation platform” for ADP’s offerings in the enterprise market. This new system, designed ten years after the release of Workday, was intended to be a highly scalable, configurable, micro-services based system, capable of managing payroll, HR processes, and all talent applications for any category of employee. The system had to support dynamic teams, many worker modalities (full-time, part-time, hourly, gig, contract), and enable a company to manage many organization structures within its corporate function, each with different business rules and overlapping employees. It was designed, in a sense, for the highly flexible, dynamic companies of the post-pandemic era. In addition to this flexible architecture, the system was designed to support workers with multiple managers (and multiple time sheets), dynamic reconfiguration for M&A or new business entities, and global payroll and tax services with custom business rules that might be variable across the company. It needed to include a recruiting module, a variety of options for goals and performance management, tools for onboarding and development, excellent reporting, and an easy-to-use narrative interface that let any employee, manager, or HR professional use, configure, or run reports on the system. In my initial meeting I walked away impressed, and I wrote an article describing this project. Today, almost six years later, this product has a name (ADP Lyric HCM) and it has reached general availability for ADP customers with 1,000 customers or more. Today ADP has 120+ large accounts so the system is proven. And since its inception Lyric HCM has been infused with extensive AI features (ADP Assist is on par with SAP Joule as a true AI interface) and benchmark information from ADP’s data cloud. In other words, this system has the potential to be a “The Next Generation” HCM platform in the market. What Is ADP Announcing And Offering The core HR system has to do a lot of things. Not only does it have to manage payroll, benefits, and tax rules (in a global, constantly changing regulatory environment), it has to be flexible, easy to configure, and filled with easy-to-use interfaces for employees and HR. And by “flexible” I mean the system has to make it easy to open a new org structure, move employees around, and create multiple modes for a “manager” or supervisor. Almost all traditional HCM providers, Workday, Oracle, and SAP, were not designed to work this way. These vendors built contract work add-ons but in most cases when you want to flatten your organization, merge with another company, or reorganize roles it’s difficult. Flattening the organization often means “re-implementing” your HRMS. Most companies only do it once a decade. ADP Lyric HCM is designed to fix this. Imagine a company like Gold’s Gym where the company is constantly opening new Gyms and hiring new managers, with employees dual reporting to multiple managers. I talked with Gold’s Gym and as you can imagine the company went through a transformation during the pandemic. Started as a Southern California fitness company, Gold’s was acquired and is now a global organization branching into many new offerings. Facilities were consolidated and each local fitness center operates with a lot of management independence. For example, an employee who is a trainer in one gym with one manager may also be a trainer or support staff in another gym with another manager. This type of “work-centric” (as opposed to “job-centric”) operation is becoming very common. Lyric HCM supports these multi-manager work models, including features for performance management, time tracking, and contract workers. Think about any retailer, healthcare company, or other highly distributed operation. One Gold’s Gym may pay overtime in one way, another in a different way. You can imagine the permutations. Every company has situations like this. I was recently at Rolls-Royce where they are centralizing engineering teams away from product groups, making 30 to 40% of their engineers “floaters.” Rolls has enormous contracts with government and commercial customers, each with different financial models. They need a system like this just like a gym, restaurant chain, or elder care network. There’s more. In addition to these HRMS and global payroll features, ADP has built an employee experience platform, employee communications system, and learning and development system. You simply type a query like “I’m getting married” and the system shows a page that consolidates tasks and resources in one place. If an HR manager wants to “pay a bonus” the system asks what organization, shows a list of people, and lets the manager define the bonus without hunting for menus and panels. Highlights Of The Next Gen Approach Since this system was architected in the age of AI, it has some very unique capabilities out of the box. First, in the area of flexibility, this is a “person-based” architecture, as opposed to a “role-based” architecture. That feature alone enables all these features to be possible. Second, in the area of usability, the system is among the most “AI-enabled” interfaces I’ve seen. While most HCMs are building assistants to speed through transactions, Lyric HCM literally “learns” what you’re trying to do and prompts you through the process. Remember these HCM systems are complex (Workday’s “Users Guide” is 2500 pages long), so we want the system to feel approachable not intimidating. As you can see from this slide, ADP also offers embedded benchmarks as well as a nudge engine. The benchmarks come from ADP’s data cloud, giving companies up to date salary ranges and other metrics by job title and job level (no other HCM platforms do this). The nudge engine is used for Lyric HCM’s onboarding and development system, reminding users of tasks or activities they need to perform. ADP Assist, the company’s Gen AI tool, lets you ask questions about any employee or group, legal and tax issues, and payroll or financial data. It’s quite powerful and I would say it rivals Joule as a conversational interface for HCM. Third, the system has a novel and approachable interface for employees. Rather than offer people a variety of “centers” or “portals” to find things, the system is smart enough to give employees exactly what it thinks they need. Typical HR transactions like changing your family status or address, or looking at benefits or pay are simple. Persona-based dashboards are designed for payroll or tax managers. And any HR professional can customize the interface for their use. Because the system is so dynamic, users can set up smart reports and other views to pinpoint the data and organizational unit they’re interested in. And ADP has built a management development tool (to take newly promoted supervisors through development), an onboarding system, and many features for performance and goal management. Where Will This Go? ADP Services When we think about ADP’s platforms we have to remember that ADP is not just a cloud software company. Most of the company’s revenue comes from services: payroll, PEO, and license fees around those offerings. This means ADP’s sales and service organization is very service-centric and highly trained in all areas of HR. (Most HR software sales teams are not HR domain experts.) To support Lyric HCM the company put together a global service team combined with dedicated client success executives to make sure each customer has a personalized, outcome-based implementation plan. This means ADP Lyric HCM is not just a great platform, but a set of people to help with configuration, utilization, integration, and long-term planning. ADP is starting to work with integrators, but likely will handle most of their customer implementations themselves. Impact On The Market. At this point Lyric HCM is positioned as an offering for mid to large companies headquartered in the United States with global workforces. This means Lyric HCM is directly positioned to compete with UKG, Ceridian, Workday, Oracle, SAP, and vendors like Darwinbox, HiBob (which is going upmarket), Lattice, and others. The “Pay” companies (Paychex, Paycor, Paycom) are focused primarily on smaller companies, but as they grow their offering they may compete as well. That is not to say ADP can solve every client need. These platforms mature over many years and each vendor has different industry and focus features. At this point I believe ADP will most likely win in industries like retail, hospitality, health care, and other distributed, hourly workforce companies. And given ADP’s focus on small and medium business, it will take time for ADP to reach large companies. Nevertheless, it’s time for change in HCM. Designed for agility and infused with AI, ADP Lyric HCM shows us a future we’ve been looking for.
    Global Payroll
    2024年09月23日
  • Global Payroll
    National Advertising Division Finds Certain Deel Payroll and HRIS Claims Supported; Recommends Others be Modified or Discontinued BBB全国项目的国家广告部(NAD)对Deel公司在其薪资和人力资源信息系统(HRIS)方面的广告声明进行了审查,回应了竞争对手Rippling提出的挑战。NAD认为,Deel的部分声明,如“每年节省高达$20,000”和“行业领先的全球薪资软件”是有依据的。然而,NAD建议修改或停止某些其他声明,特别是关于与Rippling的比较、法律合规性和客户支持的声明。NAD认为,Deel的“本地化”和“内部运营”薪资服务声明需要进一步澄清,并建议调整对Rippling的比较方式。此外,NAD要求停止使用“全球HR市场领导者”的称号,因为没有确凿证据支持这一说法。Deel已表示将遵守NAD的决定,进一步确保其广告的真实性和透明度。此次审查反映了NAD对广告真实性的持续关注,确保消费者能够获得准确的信息,同时促进公平竞争。 In a challenge brought by competitor People Center, Inc. d/b/a Rippling, BBB National Programs’ National Advertising Division determined that Deel, Inc., in connection with its Payroll and Human Resource Information System (HRIS), provided a reasonable basis for certain claims, including Deel’s “save up to $20,000 per year” claim and accompanying chart, as well as the claim that Deel has an “industry leading global payroll software.” New York, NY, Aug. 08, 2024 -- In a challenge brought by competitor People Center, Inc. d/b/a Rippling, BBB National Programs’ National Advertising Division determined that Deel, Inc., in connection with its Payroll and Human Resource Information System (HRIS), provided a reasonable basis for certain claims, including Deel’s “save up to $20,000 per year” claim and accompanying chart, as well as the claim that Deel has an “industry leading global payroll software.” However, the National Advertising Division (NAD) recommended that Deel modify or discontinue certain other claims, including comparative claims versus Rippling’s native payroll software, legal compliance, and customer support. The parties are human resources and payroll service providers that offer multiple services. Native and In-House Payroll Claims Rippling challenged claims about “native” and “in-house” payroll systems that appeared in charts on Deel’s website: “Payroll service is native and operated in-house in every country – Deel ✓, Rippling X” “Payroll service is native and operated in-house in every country – Deel ✓ Yes, Rippling X No, they currently use partners in some countries. The National Advertising Division (NAD) determined that customers could reasonably take away the message that native payroll includes native payroll software. Further, customers may reasonably take away the message that Rippling does not offer in-house and native payroll in all the countries in which it offers global payroll (outside of employer of record). Therefore, NAD recommended that Deel modify these claims by clearly and conspicuously defining what “native” means and clarifying that the comparison with Rippling also includes countries where they offer payroll as part of their employer of record services. Industry-Leading Payroll Claim Deel claims on its website to have “[i]ndustry leading global payroll software” and, in a smaller font, “Deel is a leader in multi-country payroll and contractor payments, according to G2 user reviews.” The National Advertising Division (NAD) determined that the phrase “global payroll software” means that Deel offers payroll software globally—whether that is in-house or through a third-party. Further, NAD considered the language and the context in which the “industry leading” language appears and concluded the claim does not convey a superlative message. Consumers are likely to take away the message that Deel is among the top in the industry, but not necessarily the best. Since the record indicates that Deel has significant revenue, market presence, and a large global footprint, and there is no dispute that Deel and Rippling are among the many leaders in the global payroll market, NAD concluded that this claim was not false or misleading. HRIS Comparative Claims Rippling challenged claims on Deel’s website that customers can “[s]witch to Deel HR and save up to $20,000 per year.” An accompanying chart below the claim lists seven product features with Rippling and Deel displaying checkmarks for each feature. The chart states that Deel is “Free for companies with less than 200 employees” while Rippling costs “$8 employee/month.” The National Advertising Division (NAD) concluded that because both products offer the touted features, it is not misleading to characterize Deel’s software as having those product features and that the product comparison chart is not misleading. HRIS Superlative Claims The National Advertising Division (NAD) determined that there was no evidence in the record to support an unqualified claim that Deel is #1 in the market. Therefore, NAD recommended that Deel discontinue the claims: “The market leader in the Global HR space.” “Build confidence in your compliance with the #1 Global HR platform.” Preference Claim The National Advertising Division (NAD) determined that data relied on by Deel is not a good fit for its claim that “Teams prefer Deel over Rippling for global HR and Payroll” because it did not indicate a preference for one product over another. Accordingly, NAD recommended that the claim be discontinued. Compliance Claims Rippling challenged claims about legal compliance that appeared in charts on Deel’s website: “Network of 200+ local legal hiring experts around the world -- ✓ Yes, Rippling X No” “Compliance document collection for contractors, on top of EOR, constantly reviewed and updated.” The National Advertising Division (NAD) determined that in context it is reasonable to take away the message that Rippling has an inferior network of legal experts around the world, and it does not offer compliance document collection. Since Deel submitted no evidence in support of these two claims, NAD recommended it discontinue the comparative part of these claims as they relate to Rippling and cease conveying the messages that there are legal risks associated with using Rippling products and that Rippling’s products are not compliant. NAD noted that nothing in its decision would prevent Deel from advertising its network of local legal hiring experts or comparing its compliance services to Rippling’s so long as they do not claim that Rippling lacks a network of 200+ local legal hiring experts around the world or compliance document collection for contractors. Customer Support Claims The National Advertising Division (NAD) determined that the comparative claim that Rippling does not offer multi-channel support is not false or misleading. However, NAD concluded that the unqualified claim, “Deel’s support is in-house, reliable, and faster than Rippling” is not supported and recommended that it be discontinued or modified to make clear the circumstances and times when its support would be faster and avoid conveying the message that Rippling’s customer support is unreliable. Further, NAD determined that Deel’s claim “Same level of service in every country with centralized communications – Deel ✓ Yes, Rippling X No, as they use partners in some places,” is not supported because there is no evidence about the level of service provided by Rippling in any country. Therefore, NAD recommended that the claim be discontinued. During the proceeding Deel permanently discontinued and modified certain claims. Therefore, NAD did not review these claims on their merits and will treat the claims, for compliance purposes, as though NAD recommended they be discontinued. In its advertiser statement, Deel stated that it will comply with NAD’s decision. All BBB National Programs case decision summaries can be found in the case decision library. For the full text of NAD, NARB, and CARU decisions, subscribe to the online archive. This press release shall not be used for advertising or promotional purposes. About BBB National Programs: BBB National Programs, a non-profit organization, is the home of U.S. independent industry self-regulation, currently operating more than a dozen globally recognized programs that have been helping enhance consumer trust in business for more than 50 years. These programs provide third-party accountability and dispute resolution services that address existing and emerging industry issues, create a fairer playing field for businesses, and a better experience for consumers. BBB National Programs continues to evolve its work and grow its impact by providing business guidance and fostering best practices in arenas such as advertising, child-and-teen-directed marketing, data privacy, dispute resolution, automobile warranty, technology, and emerging areas. To learn more, visit bbbprograms.org. About the National Advertising Division: The National Advertising Division of BBB National Programs provides independent self-regulation and dispute resolution services, guiding the truthfulness of advertising across the U.S. The National Advertising Division reviews national advertising in all media and its decisions set consistent standards for advertising truth and accuracy, delivering meaningful protection to consumers and leveling the playing field for business.
    Global Payroll
    2024年08月10日