• Marketing
    Indeed起诉ZipRecruiter:指控虚假宣传抢夺客户 近日,全球领先的招聘平台之一Indeed向其主要竞争对手ZipRecruiter提起了一场备受关注的诉讼,指控ZipRecruiter通过误导性宣传手段抢夺客户,引发了招聘行业的一场法律风波。这场官司的焦点围绕Indeed于2024年进行的一项政策调整以及ZipRecruiter对此的宣传方式展开,显示出在招聘平台竞争激烈的背景下,任何微小的策略调整都可能导致市场动荡。 政策变动引发竞争风波 Indeed在2024年年中宣布了一项影响广泛的政策调整,决定限制免费职位发布的双重发布。该政策于2024年10月1日正式生效,旨在减少重复职位发布,避免给求职者带来困惑。根据新规,企业通过外部数据源或申请系统自动发布的免费职位将不再与直接在Indeed平台上发布的职位重复出现。该举措表面上看似是优化求职者体验的一项调整,然而对许多依赖Indeed免费职位发布的雇主而言,这一变化引发了担忧。 就在政策生效前后,ZipRecruiter迅速采取行动,通过电子邮件和社交媒体向Indeed的客户发送信息,声称Indeed将完全取消免费职位发布,并要求所有职位都需付费。据悉,ZipRecruiter的多名员工在社交平台LinkedIn上发布了与此相关的内容,称Indeed的新政策将影响职位的可见性,并增加企业对付费广告的依赖。 Indeed的法律行动:指控误导与不正当竞争 面对ZipRecruiter的行动,Indeed于2024年10月7日向美国德克萨斯州西区联邦法院提起诉讼,指控ZipRecruiter在市场竞争中使用了误导性信息,违反了《兰哈姆法》(Lanham Act),并干涉了Indeed与其客户之间的合同关系。Indeed在诉讼中指出,尽管其确实对免费职位发布政策进行了调整,但并未完全取消免费职位发布。然而,ZipRecruiter通过错误的宣传信息,让Indeed的客户产生了误解,影响了客户与Indeed的关系。 更值得注意的是,Indeed还指控ZipRecruiter的员工违反了Indeed的服务条款,创建虚假的Indeed账户,并利用这些账户与Indeed的客户进行接触,试图通过虚假陈述获取客户。Indeed认为,ZipRecruiter此举不仅误导了雇主,还损害了Indeed产品和服务的市场价值。 ZipRecruiter的回应:竞争的合法性争议 面对Indeed的指控,ZipRecruiter迅速作出回应,否认了Indeed的所有指控,并称其行为属于合法的市场竞争。ZipRecruiter的发言人在一份声明中表示:“我们强烈反对Indeed的指控,认为与Indeed的竞争并不违反联邦法律。”他们认为,Indeed的诉讼并未解决行业内因其政策变化所引发的混乱,反而是试图通过法律手段遏制市场竞争。 ZipRecruiter还特别提到,Indeed的政策变化对招聘行业有重大影响,特别是对那些依赖免费职位发布的中小型企业。ZipRecruiter表示,其宣传活动的目的在于帮助企业应对Indeed新政策带来的挑战,而非故意传播虚假信息。 招聘行业竞争的激烈局面 此次Indeed与ZipRecruiter的法律纠纷反映了招聘行业日益激烈的市场竞争。作为全球最大的人力资源招聘平台之一,Indeed在过去几年中占据了重要的市场份额,凭借其庞大的求职者和雇主数据库,Indeed在全球范围内拥有3.5百万家雇主和3.5亿独立访问者。然而,2024年Indeed面临的挑战显而易见,包括推行的按申请付费(pay-per-application)模式引发了雇主的不满,以及市场招聘放缓导致的裁员等,都对其市场表现造成了一定的负面影响。 与此同时,ZipRecruiter则通过持续创新和市场扩展,迅速占领了招聘市场的一部分。在Indeed宣布政策调整后,ZipRecruiter迅速采取行动,通过社交媒体和邮件营销,利用行业的混乱局面吸引客户。这也进一步说明了在招聘市场中,竞争对手的每一个策略调整都可能被视为机会,而如何合法地在激烈的市场竞争中脱颖而出,成为各大招聘平台需要面对的核心问题。 案件的未来影响与行业启示 Indeed对ZipRecruiter提起的这场诉讼,不仅仅是两家巨头之间的法律纠纷,它还揭示了招聘行业面临的更广泛的问题。在招聘行业中,免费职位发布一直是吸引中小型企业的重要工具,而任何对这一模式的调整都可能对市场产生深远的影响。ZipRecruiter抓住了这一变化,并通过快速反应尝试扩大自己的市场份额,但这种营销方式也面临着法律风险。 目前,Indeed正在寻求法庭的声明性和禁令性救济,希望法院裁定ZipRecruiter的行为违反了法律,并要求ZipRecruiter停止在Indeed平台上招揽客户或传播误导性信息。随着案件的审理推进,法院的判决可能对未来招聘平台的市场策略产生深远的影响,也为整个行业如何合法公平地竞争提供了新的思考方向。 总的来说,此案不仅涉及市场份额的争夺,更是招聘平台在面对激烈竞争时如何平衡商业策略与法律合规的一次考验。未来,类似的竞争与法律纠纷可能会进一步改变整个招聘行业的格局。
    Marketing
    2024年10月16日
  • Marketing
    National Advertising Division Finds Certain Deel Payroll and HRIS Claims Supported; Recommends Others be Modified or Discontinued BBB全国项目的国家广告部(NAD)对Deel公司在其薪资和人力资源信息系统(HRIS)方面的广告声明进行了审查,回应了竞争对手Rippling提出的挑战。NAD认为,Deel的部分声明,如“每年节省高达$20,000”和“行业领先的全球薪资软件”是有依据的。然而,NAD建议修改或停止某些其他声明,特别是关于与Rippling的比较、法律合规性和客户支持的声明。NAD认为,Deel的“本地化”和“内部运营”薪资服务声明需要进一步澄清,并建议调整对Rippling的比较方式。此外,NAD要求停止使用“全球HR市场领导者”的称号,因为没有确凿证据支持这一说法。Deel已表示将遵守NAD的决定,进一步确保其广告的真实性和透明度。此次审查反映了NAD对广告真实性的持续关注,确保消费者能够获得准确的信息,同时促进公平竞争。 In a challenge brought by competitor People Center, Inc. d/b/a Rippling, BBB National Programs’ National Advertising Division determined that Deel, Inc., in connection with its Payroll and Human Resource Information System (HRIS), provided a reasonable basis for certain claims, including Deel’s “save up to $20,000 per year” claim and accompanying chart, as well as the claim that Deel has an “industry leading global payroll software.” New York, NY, Aug. 08, 2024 -- In a challenge brought by competitor People Center, Inc. d/b/a Rippling, BBB National Programs’ National Advertising Division determined that Deel, Inc., in connection with its Payroll and Human Resource Information System (HRIS), provided a reasonable basis for certain claims, including Deel’s “save up to $20,000 per year” claim and accompanying chart, as well as the claim that Deel has an “industry leading global payroll software.” However, the National Advertising Division (NAD) recommended that Deel modify or discontinue certain other claims, including comparative claims versus Rippling’s native payroll software, legal compliance, and customer support. The parties are human resources and payroll service providers that offer multiple services. Native and In-House Payroll Claims Rippling challenged claims about “native” and “in-house” payroll systems that appeared in charts on Deel’s website: “Payroll service is native and operated in-house in every country – Deel ✓, Rippling X” “Payroll service is native and operated in-house in every country – Deel ✓ Yes, Rippling X No, they currently use partners in some countries. The National Advertising Division (NAD) determined that customers could reasonably take away the message that native payroll includes native payroll software. Further, customers may reasonably take away the message that Rippling does not offer in-house and native payroll in all the countries in which it offers global payroll (outside of employer of record). Therefore, NAD recommended that Deel modify these claims by clearly and conspicuously defining what “native” means and clarifying that the comparison with Rippling also includes countries where they offer payroll as part of their employer of record services. Industry-Leading Payroll Claim Deel claims on its website to have “[i]ndustry leading global payroll software” and, in a smaller font, “Deel is a leader in multi-country payroll and contractor payments, according to G2 user reviews.” The National Advertising Division (NAD) determined that the phrase “global payroll software” means that Deel offers payroll software globally—whether that is in-house or through a third-party. Further, NAD considered the language and the context in which the “industry leading” language appears and concluded the claim does not convey a superlative message. Consumers are likely to take away the message that Deel is among the top in the industry, but not necessarily the best. Since the record indicates that Deel has significant revenue, market presence, and a large global footprint, and there is no dispute that Deel and Rippling are among the many leaders in the global payroll market, NAD concluded that this claim was not false or misleading. HRIS Comparative Claims Rippling challenged claims on Deel’s website that customers can “[s]witch to Deel HR and save up to $20,000 per year.” An accompanying chart below the claim lists seven product features with Rippling and Deel displaying checkmarks for each feature. The chart states that Deel is “Free for companies with less than 200 employees” while Rippling costs “$8 employee/month.” The National Advertising Division (NAD) concluded that because both products offer the touted features, it is not misleading to characterize Deel’s software as having those product features and that the product comparison chart is not misleading. HRIS Superlative Claims The National Advertising Division (NAD) determined that there was no evidence in the record to support an unqualified claim that Deel is #1 in the market. Therefore, NAD recommended that Deel discontinue the claims: “The market leader in the Global HR space.” “Build confidence in your compliance with the #1 Global HR platform.” Preference Claim The National Advertising Division (NAD) determined that data relied on by Deel is not a good fit for its claim that “Teams prefer Deel over Rippling for global HR and Payroll” because it did not indicate a preference for one product over another. Accordingly, NAD recommended that the claim be discontinued. Compliance Claims Rippling challenged claims about legal compliance that appeared in charts on Deel’s website: “Network of 200+ local legal hiring experts around the world -- ✓ Yes, Rippling X No” “Compliance document collection for contractors, on top of EOR, constantly reviewed and updated.” The National Advertising Division (NAD) determined that in context it is reasonable to take away the message that Rippling has an inferior network of legal experts around the world, and it does not offer compliance document collection. Since Deel submitted no evidence in support of these two claims, NAD recommended it discontinue the comparative part of these claims as they relate to Rippling and cease conveying the messages that there are legal risks associated with using Rippling products and that Rippling’s products are not compliant. NAD noted that nothing in its decision would prevent Deel from advertising its network of local legal hiring experts or comparing its compliance services to Rippling’s so long as they do not claim that Rippling lacks a network of 200+ local legal hiring experts around the world or compliance document collection for contractors. Customer Support Claims The National Advertising Division (NAD) determined that the comparative claim that Rippling does not offer multi-channel support is not false or misleading. However, NAD concluded that the unqualified claim, “Deel’s support is in-house, reliable, and faster than Rippling” is not supported and recommended that it be discontinued or modified to make clear the circumstances and times when its support would be faster and avoid conveying the message that Rippling’s customer support is unreliable. Further, NAD determined that Deel’s claim “Same level of service in every country with centralized communications – Deel ✓ Yes, Rippling X No, as they use partners in some places,” is not supported because there is no evidence about the level of service provided by Rippling in any country. Therefore, NAD recommended that the claim be discontinued. During the proceeding Deel permanently discontinued and modified certain claims. Therefore, NAD did not review these claims on their merits and will treat the claims, for compliance purposes, as though NAD recommended they be discontinued. In its advertiser statement, Deel stated that it will comply with NAD’s decision. All BBB National Programs case decision summaries can be found in the case decision library. For the full text of NAD, NARB, and CARU decisions, subscribe to the online archive. This press release shall not be used for advertising or promotional purposes. About BBB National Programs: BBB National Programs, a non-profit organization, is the home of U.S. independent industry self-regulation, currently operating more than a dozen globally recognized programs that have been helping enhance consumer trust in business for more than 50 years. These programs provide third-party accountability and dispute resolution services that address existing and emerging industry issues, create a fairer playing field for businesses, and a better experience for consumers. BBB National Programs continues to evolve its work and grow its impact by providing business guidance and fostering best practices in arenas such as advertising, child-and-teen-directed marketing, data privacy, dispute resolution, automobile warranty, technology, and emerging areas. To learn more, visit bbbprograms.org. About the National Advertising Division: The National Advertising Division of BBB National Programs provides independent self-regulation and dispute resolution services, guiding the truthfulness of advertising across the U.S. The National Advertising Division reviews national advertising in all media and its decisions set consistent standards for advertising truth and accuracy, delivering meaningful protection to consumers and leveling the playing field for business.
    Marketing
    2024年08月10日