• 生产力
    Josh Bersin: 随着经济放缓,关注未来的技能:改变的能力 本周,我们看到美国失业率“上升”到 4.3%,经济学家开始呼吁降低利率。对于那些每天与公司和领导者交流的人来说,我会说我们正经历一个正常的经济周期。 上一次重大衰退(不包括疫情,因为那不是需求放缓)是在2008年和2009年。这意味着我们已经有近16年没有经历严重的经济周期了,几乎是通常周期的两倍。虽然疫情确实让公司放慢了脚步,但我们迅速恢复了。所以从失业率来看,它大致是这样的。 在经历了50年的失业率变化后,目前的失业率比五十年前降低了12%,这让我得出结论,我们正生活在“长期劳动力短缺”中。同时,美国的GDP在此期间增长了1500%。 虽然我们目前的GDP增长可能有所放缓(我认为这是由消费者价格使我们耗尽了支出引起的),但实际上我们只是看到从“工业化、高劳动密集型企业”向所谓的“后工业化”公司的长期转型,这些公司往往需要更少的“工人”和更多高技能员工。(阅读我们的后工业时代研究。) 仍然有大量的小时工工作:护理、医疗、交通、建筑、零售、娱乐、能源和许多其他行业依赖各种类型的“劳动”工人。这些工作随着时间的推移变得越来越自动化,导致工资提高和技能升级,但美国仍有约63%的工人没有大学学位,其中大多数人找到了工作。 虽然每个人似乎对英特尔、UKG, Intuit或其他“与AI相关”的裁员感到有些恐慌,但美国经济的反应良好。我知道许多公司正在试验AI和其他技术,每个公司都担心失去有价值的人才,因为劳动力市场依然竞争激烈。 是的,一些公司会进行裁员。通常这是由糟糕的领导、糟糕的规划或只是对投资者的本能反应引起的。最终,随着出生率保持在低水平,我们仍将面临劳动力短缺,人的价值将继续上升(正如我过去指出的,裁员并非不可避免)。 在过去的三周里,我与欧洲超过20家大公司会面,每家公司都在投资于员工发展、技能再培训、内部流动性和提高生产力的项目。在欧洲,裁员既困难又昂贵,因此公司感受到劳动力短缺的压力,他们仍在投资员工。 至于消费者需求开始下降,我们正面临一个“长期结束”阶段,这是由高价格的延续引起的。消费者对过去五年的高价格感到厌倦,而在此之前,我们经历了近十年的零利率时期,房价和大多数资本品价格持续上涨。现在这两个因素都结束了,我们只是回到了更正常的经济状态。 换句话说,如果你因为“可以”而提高价格,最终你将付出代价,当消费者反抗时。如果你停止投资于员工,他们会“悄然离职”或另寻他处。这些是我认为的“正常商业经济”,我认为我们正看到这种正常性的发生。 作为一个动态组织运营 当然,最大的“趋势”是各行业的数字化和AI革命。汽车制造商被“虚假”引导进入电动车领域,发现混合动力发动机、数字相机和电子产品以及新的购车方式非常具有破坏性。出版商正在找出如何应对AI平台,这次他们保留了自己的知识产权并协商了许可协议。能源公司正在慢慢转向新来源,其他公司都在找出如何实现数字化、AI赋能,并进一步简化我们生产和销售的产品。 这都是商业的“激动人心的工作”,一切都与成为一个动态组织有关。我们的研究指出,以动态方式运营完全是关于人。 经济,通常以周期性变化(通常由过度兴奋和随之而来的疲惫引起)为特征,只是需要应对的事情。对于我这样经历了许多这种高峰和低谷的人来说,当事情不再上升并且我们看到一些冷却期时,我总是感到有点“解脱”。 是的,股市可能会暴跌。它总会在某个时候发生。但那实际上是“众包”效应,通常与我们的公司无关。如果你照顾好你的客户,投资未来,迅速学习AI和所有新技术,你将顺利过渡。正如许多HR领导本月与我谈到的,你的成功很大程度上取决于人。 未来的技能很明确:推动变革的能力 今天我与一群我们每隔几周就交流的HR领导进行了一次有趣的会议。每一位CHRO和其他领导都告诉我们,他们正在投资于员工的“变革管理”和“业务转型”技能。这意味着什么? 这意味着这样。虽然我们都希望公司有更多的工程师、制造专家、科学家和销售与营销专家,但我们最需要的“技能”是“推动变革的能力”。这种特定的技能非常复杂,需要时间来学习,并且在当前尤为重要。这引出了我的最后一点。 如果你是图凡·厄金比尔吉,劳斯莱斯的首席执行官,你正处于业务转型的过程中,旨在推动工程效率和卓越,你不仅要担心工程师。你要担心那些能够推动、领导、激励和创造变革的人。我相信,这些就是大家常谈的“未来技能”。如果你作为一个专业人士、经理或领导者真正知道如何“推动和执行变革”,这些经济周期在你的职业生涯中只是“一个小波折”。 在与HR领导交谈超过30年并在许多周期中经营我们自己的业务后,我敦促你“不要过于担心”这些大的经济数据。我们正生活在一个每个公司中每个人的经济价值飙升的时期。投资于你的员工和自己,随着经济的变化,你会做得很好。   https://joshbersin.com/2024/08/as-the-economy-changes-focus-on-the-real-skills-of-the-future/
    生产力
    2024年08月03日
  • 生产力
    Will Chatbots Take Over HR Tech? Paradox Sets The Pace. 在快速发展的人力资源技术领域,Paradox.ai 已成为领跑者,其先进的对话式人工智能平台彻底改变了招聘流程。通过利用自然语言处理和人工智能,Paradox.ai 提供了一个全面的解决方案,涵盖了从最初的职位申请到入职的整个招聘过程。该平台不仅简化了筛选和面试安排等繁琐流程,还提升了应聘者的整体体验,显著改善了招聘时间和招聘质量指标。 Paradox.ai 由亚伦-马托斯(Aaron Matos)于 2016 年创立,目前为联合利华、CVS Health 和通用汽车等大客户提供服务,实现了 90% 以上的招聘流程自动化。 Paradox.ai 凭借其强大的集成能力和大幅缩短招聘时间、降低招聘成本的能力,在人力资源技术领域充分体现了对话式人工智能的变革力量。 Chatbots used to be tinker-toys. You type, try to get help, but usually result in “please call support.” Well all this has changed. Thanks to advanced NLP (natural language processing) and AI (retrieval-augmented generation) chatbots are entire applications. They can answer complex questions, search databases, and invoke transactions on your behalf. Pretty soon we’ll be able to ask our phones “please find me a flight to Los Angeles next Tuesday morning” and the system will check your location and calendar, look at flights, and book you a seat. Where is this going in HR? Well the leader in this space is Paradox.ai, a company that pioneered the application of conversational AI in recruiting. And their system “defines the category.” Let me explain. Recruiting Is The Perfect Market For Conversational AI Recruiting is a goldmine for automation. When you post a job, applicants want to ask many predictable things: “How much does it pay?” “What are the hours?” or “What uniform do I need” or “What are the benefits?” The recruiter, a person devoted to filling positions, has to answer all these questions and more. They have to screen candidates, schedule interviews, check for qualifications, and look at credentials, experience, and more. It’s time-consuming, error-prone, and filled with wasted time. (That’s why talent acquisition teams have many “scheduler” and admins.) The average “time to hire” is over 45 days and often the process goes on for months. And throughout the experience the job seeker is left wondering “when will they call back” or “what else do I need to know?” (CEOs cite hiring as the third most time-wasting process in companies, following emails and meetings, estimated at “40% wasted time.”) Paradox uses Conversational AI to solve this problem. And because this is a “narrow but deep” space, the system does many things we can learn from in all our AI efforts. Paradox was founded by Aaron Matos in 2016. Aaron’s vision was to transform the candidate experience, revolutionizing the way candidates apply to jobs. Today Paradox has become a complete Conversational AI Recruitment Platform (chat to apply, scheduling, candidate support, ATS, assessments, onboarding, career site, and more), serving clients like Unilever, CVS Health, Pfizer, L’Oreal, Nestle, McDonald’s FedEx, Compass Group, Disney, and General Motors. The platform automates tasks such as screening for requirements, interview scheduling, reminders, offers, and new hire onboarding. And because it’s so easy to use, it helps companies radically improves time-to-hire and quality of hire. Based on my conversations with clients, Paradox can automate more than 90% of the end-to-end hiring process, saving hiring managers hours every week and increasing candidate conversion by more than 10 times. But this innovation did not happen overnight. As you know, going to a candidate website and looking for a job is a frustrating process. There are often hundreds of jobs listed, a complex scrolling website and very hard to even determine what job to apply for. You might argue that the website paradigm for job applications was never really a good idea in the first place. People don’t want to browse for jobs: they want to apply for a job that’s best for them. So the first thing Paradox did was create an easy to use assistant (Olivia) so candidates could ask questions and schedule interviews. And this meant that Paradox had to build integrations with every ATS and personal email and calendar tools out there. Then, as companies started to use Paradox for scheduling, the company added more. Today Olivia, the chatbot, can integrate with background check vendors, schedule interviews, deliver assessments (Paradox acquired a conversational assessment Traitify designed for this), and function as an ATS … all from a mobile phone. In many ways Paradox can be “the integration platform” for candidates and recruiters, stitching together the messy systems behind the scenes. This turned into a massive opportunity. Just as the Google Assistant or Siri hopes to be our single contact with the internet, Paradox partners with systems of record like Workday, SAP, and Oracle to bring conversational AI to any company. The company’s revenues have grown 11 times in the last four years, and are now nearly doubling each year. For customers Paradox has been amazing. As the candidate pipeline speeds up (by an order of magnitude), clients get higher quality candidates with dramatically reduced staff. (Staffing administrators can almost go away.) Consider high-volume hiring companies. These businesses (McDonald’s, Compass Group, Neighborly, FedEx, Disney) hire service-related workers on a regular basis. Their revenue is dependent on having enough people. With Paradox they can set up a “continuous recruitment process,” one that even hires people the same day they apply. Paradox has become essential to these companies growth, often paying for itself in less than a year (through reduced hiring staff, reduced spend on job ads, and reduced turnover.) Today, as Paradox built out its ATS, customers can rely on the platform to integrate front end tool (job portals and candidate support) to back end tools scheduling, ATS, onboarding) most of which are legacy. One of our clients has 27 recruiting tools and they anticipate replacing more than half of them with a platform like Paradox. What about higher level white collar roles? Paradox works here too. General Motors uses Paradox along with Workday (ATS), (branded Evie) to redesign the process. Interview Scheduling: Evie automates scheduling of phone screens and interviews between recruiters, candidates, and internal teams. This has reduced the time taken for interview scheduling from an average of five days to 29 minutes. Candidate Experience: Evie interacts with candidates from the moment they land on GM’s career site until the completion of their interview. Candidates appreciate the immediate communication from Evie after they apply or complete an interview, and enjoy the autonomy to select and change interview times. Efficiency and Cost Savings: The automation of interview scheduling has led to a major reduction in the cost of external contractors for coordination. Career Site Interaction: Evie sits on GM’s career site, answering questions from potential candidates about jobs, benefits, and company culture. This interaction enhances the candidate’s experience and provides them with immediate responses to their queries. Where Is Paradox Going The company is perfectly positioned to continue its growth as companies look for AI solutions to improve the productivity and effectiveness of recruiting. And demand is high: the 2024 PwC CEO survey found that recruiting was considered the #3 “most bureaucratic process” by CEOs (following email and meetings). The impact on recruiters? All positive. Clients tell us they can redeploy hiring staff to help recruiters focus on the most important part of their job: talking with candidates. But there’s a much bigger story. When a job candidate is handled efficiently and effectively the process becomes a brand-builder for the candidate, improving quality of hire. Ambitious job seekers will not put up with (or wait for) a messy, confusing hiring process. So not only is the process faster and more efficient, the quality of hire goes up. Companies are desperately looking for AI solutions that work. As Paradox has proven, when you focus deeply on the problem, conversational AI can be transformational. Listen to my conversation with Adam Godson (CEO) and you’ll hear the details. This is where the HR Tech market is going.
    生产力
    2024年04月04日