decision-making - 北美华人人力资源协会

decision-making

深度观察 | AI重构HR的未来蓝图：战略编排才是核心战场--解读Deloitte《HR Reimagined: Agentic AI for HR》在AI加速重塑企业运作方式的今天，人力资源领域也正经历着一场深刻变革。2025年夏季，Deloitte 发布了最新研究报告《HR Reimagined: Agentic AI for HR》，由资深人力资本与AI转型顾问 Greg Vert 和 Kyle Forrest 联合撰写。报告围绕“Agentic AI”（智能体AI）这一新一代技术，系统探讨了AI如何在HR全价值链中发挥作用——从战略规划、治理体系，到能力建设与技术架构，并通过16项HR核心能力与67个具体活动的分析，描绘了从AI辅助（Assisted）到增强（Augmented）再到AI驱动（AI-Powered）的成熟路径。本文将结合报告核心内容与行业背景，带来一份深入的中文解读，帮助HR领导者与业务决策者理解AI在HR中的落地价值、潜在风险及战略编排方法。非常值得推荐阅读！！如果需要PDF 可以邮件我们 nacshr818@gmail.com 获取德勤报告人工智能的快速发展，正在让HR领域面临一次前所未有的变革。从招聘到员工体验，从绩效管理到流程优化，AI的触角已经伸入几乎所有HR职能。Deloitte 在《HR Reimagined: Agentic AI for HR》中，描绘了一幅未来蓝图——AI不再只是工具，而是HR战略执行的核心力量。本文将结合报告要点，带来一份面向HR领导者的深度解读。 1. AI在HR的三种形态：从辅助到驱动报告指出，AI在HR的应用大致分为三个阶段：辅助型（Assisted）：AI为人类提供支持，如自动生成职位描述、初步整理数据等。增强型（Augmented）：人类与AI交替协作，AI能处理部分复杂任务，如候选人筛选、知识库更新、调查分析。驱动型（AI-Powered）：AI主导流程执行，人类负责监督与优化，例如自动完成员工咨询、生成分析报告、触发跨部门流程。解读：企业应先明确自身在这三个阶段中的位置，然后规划向更高阶段的演进路径，而不是盲目堆砌工具。 2. Agentic AI：HR的“虚拟同事” 传统AI往往是功能插件，作用单一。而Agentic AI的特征在于：理解上下文、规划多步骤任务、调用不同系统完成工作，并能根据反馈优化执行。这类AI更像是一名“虚拟同事”，能够独立完成从信号识别到结果交付的全流程。解读：这要求HR团队具备“管理AI”的能力——为AI设定任务边界、明确流程接口、评估其工作成效，而不是只当它是一个按钮或查询工具。 3. 角色重塑：从事务处理到战略赋能 AI的引入会让HR的时间分配发生显著变化： HR业务伙伴（HRBP）：从有限服务部分业务单元，转向为全体管理者提供战略性人才辅导。卓越中心（COE）：从数据收集整理转向实时洞察与预测，参与前置决策。 HR运营（HR Ops）：80%以上的日常事务由AI执行，团队重心转向员工体验和流程改进。解读：HR的绩效评估指标也应随之调整，从“完成多少任务”转向“业务贡献度”和“战略影响力”。 4. 高价值落地场景报告给出了一些能快速显现成效的Agentic AI应用：入职流程：多个AI协作完成任务分配、福利登记、培训安排，跨平台无缝衔接。请假与返岗管理：AI提前识别返岗事件，触发跨部门流程，并根据反馈优化体验。人才保留：AI实时分析流失风险并推送定制化留才方案，直接触发奖励或调配。解读：这些场景有三个共性——跨系统、闭环执行、可持续优化，非常适合做为企业的AI试点项目。 5. 碎片化风险与战略编排如果不同部门各自引入AI工具，很容易造成“67个AI源”的割裂局面：数据孤岛、体验不一致、治理困难。报告提出五个关键步骤来避免碎片化：规划：目标与业务战略、员工需求一致；治理：覆盖伦理、数据安全、信任机制；能力建设：集中AI专业能力，设立卓越中心；编排：工具互通并嵌入核心流程，而非外挂；衡量：效率、体验、公平性与成果并重。解读：这本质上是“企业级AI治理”的HR版本，需要跨部门协作才能真正落地。 6. 技术趋势：多智能体系统（MAS）未来12-18个月，用户与HR系统的交互将从传统API调用，逐步转向多智能体系统（MAS）——多个AI可以相互协作、与人类互动、跨平台执行复杂任务。例如，招聘AI可以直接与培训AI、薪酬AI协作，实现从录用到入职培训到福利登记的自动化闭环。解读：这意味着企业未来的AI生态将是“团队作战”而非“单兵作战”，需要提前规划架构与数据接口。结语：AI价值取决于编排能力 AI进入HR是不可逆趋势，但它的价值并不会自动释放。真正的竞争力来自于战略性编排与持续优化——让AI不只是辅助工具，而是组织能力的一部分。对于想在未来人才竞争中保持领先的HR团队来说，现在正是重新设计角色、流程与能力结构的关键窗口期。报告来源：Deloitte《HR Reimagined: Agentic AI for HR》作者：Greg Vert 与 Kyle Forrest

decision-making
2025年08月13日
decision-making

Josh Bersin:人工智能能战胜人类直觉做决策吗？不可能多年来，我们一直在争论 AI 是否能用于人类决策，比如：该雇佣谁？该提拔谁？薪酬多少合适？以及数百种其他决策。领导者每天都面临复杂、艰难的抉择——我们能信任 AI 来替我们做决定吗？我的观点是：不能。这正是我最新一期播客的主题。什么是直觉？什么是情绪？我们都知道所谓“第一类思维”（Type 1 Thinking）——也就是直觉反应——在我们日常生活中扮演着主导角色。比如你见到一个人、坐在一个会议中，突然就知道“该雇谁”或“该怎么做”，即使数据很难查证。我最近深入研究了遗传学、情绪与直觉，并得出结论：再强大的 AI “超级智能”，也无法替代我们的情绪。而这些情绪，来自我们的成长背景、过往经历，甚至基因组成——往往比数据更具洞察力。作为一名工程师，我当然推崇数据与科学，因此并不是在否定算法与数据驱动决策。但我在人力资本领域的研究一再证明，是“人类直觉”在补充、辅助，并最终确定那些 AI 给出的建议。 AI 做决策的局限性在哪里？ AI 系统依赖“概率神经网络”进行训练，模型会从已有数据中学习，再用来判断新信息——写一段代码、生成一张图、创作一篇文章，它做得确实很出色。这是因为它可以瞬间把所有训练内容当作一个巨大的“数据集”，并用向量计算给出答案。但这都基于一个假设：数据本身就足够全面，能够包含足够多的观点和洞察。如今，大多数大型 AI 实验室已承认“可索引的数据已经用尽”，所以开始制造“合成数据”——也就是 AI 用已有数据生成新数据，以此来扩充模型。问题来了：这些数据缺失了什么？如果你研究情绪理论（至少有六种主流理论），你会发现大多数观点都认为，一个人“对一件事的感觉”源于其生活经历、刺激源（所见所闻所感）以及基因。而“基因”这个维度，则是几百万年人类进化的产物。所以即使某个商业决策在逻辑上是合理的，但我们每个人对数据的解读都是不同的，而我们的反应也由经验和人性所驱动。这就是为什么在一个高管会议上，大家面对同一组营收与市场数据，却会得出完全不同的结论：比如一个人说：“我们做得不错，该庆祝！”另一个则说：“为什么没更快增长？我们本可以更好！” 为什么人类决策更有优势？人类互动千差万别，有人积极进取，有人保守稳重。这种“直觉差异”正是一些公司在市场中脱颖而出的关键。那这种直觉来自哪里？来自我们几百万年的进化历史与独特的“表观遗传能力”（epigenetic capabilities）。换句话说，人类智能与直觉，源于我们的家族基因、成长经历与历史背景。以我自己为例：父亲那边是音乐家与科学家，母亲家族是商人。我最终成了一个热爱商业与人力工作的工程师。而因为父母都是企业家，我也成了一个有野心、敢冒险、喜欢挑战的人。这些人类“能力”，本质上是历史和基因的组合，它们在我们的情感、直觉、性格和智慧中展现出来。 AI 决策能超越人类吗？绝不可能。很多人用丹尼尔·卡尼曼的书《思考，快与慢》来解释这个问题。书中提出： “快速思维”是直觉， “慢速思维”是分析。尽管这个划分广受欢迎，但现实更复杂。AI 在“慢速分析”方面确实做得不错，但仍然极其“幼稚”。比如让 Grok 来解释“杰弗里·爱泼斯坦事件”，它会给出一段生硬的描述，但完全没有触及人类直觉所捕捉到的“这是个肮脏、混乱、令人羞耻的丑闻”。我想表达的是：无论 AI 如何发展，也无论企业在数据中心上投入多少资金，它都无法复制人类在基因、历史与演化层面累积的智能。举几个例子你就明白了：当你开车经过街口，看到一个小孩站在路边，你的本能反应是“她可能会突然冲出来”。当你在会议中感到“这个决策不对”，你会下意识决定“我们先别急，明天再看看感觉”。而 AI 呢？它只会基于逻辑推演立即给出一个“答案”。总结：人类直觉，在AI时代更重要这种“情绪 + 本能 + 遗传”的判断力，正是人类与众不同的关键所在。正因如此，我们才会有乔布斯与盖茨的不同，马斯克与奥特曼的差异。我们必须正视并尊重这些“人类智能”的组成部分，它们比以往任何时候都更重要。

decision-making
2025年07月27日
decision-making

什么是Agentic AI？AI Agent如何重塑HR行业？ "Agentic AI"（代理人工智能）是您可能听说过的最新流行语，但实际上这个词在人力资源工作中的应用其实已经有一段时间了！但究竟什么是 Agentic AI？它和传统的AI Agent有何区别？2025年是否真的是AI Agent之年？特别呈现这篇文章与您分享！在人工智能（AI）快速发展的今天，我们已经经历了**预测AI（Predictive AI）和生成式AI（Generative AI）**的兴起，而如今，**Agentic AI（自主智能体AI）**正成为AI的下一个进化阶段。对于HR行业而言，这一技术的到来意味着更加智能的HR系统、自动化的人才管理流程，以及更精准的数据驱动决策。但究竟什么是Agentic AI？它和传统的AI Agent有何区别？2025年是否真的是AI Agent之年？本文将为你详细解析Agentic AI的核心概念，并探讨它如何改变HR行业。 1. 什么是Agentic AI？ Agentic AI（自主智能体AI）是一种具备自主行动能力的人工智能技术，它不仅能像生成式AI一样回答问题、生成内容，还能自主感知环境、推理分析、执行任务，并从反馈中不断优化自身能力。相比于传统的AI系统，Agentic AI最大的不同在于：自主性（Autonomy）：无需人工干预，AI代理可以独立完成任务，例如审核候选人简历、优化招聘流程等。适应性（Adaptability）：AI能够根据反馈不断优化决策，例如HR系统可以自动调整绩效评估标准，以适应不同部门的需求。目标导向（Goal Orientation）：Agentic AI可以自主制定目标，并推理如何达成这些目标，例如自动匹配候选人与职位，提高招聘效率。 2. AI Agent vs. Agentic AI：有什么区别？在HR行业中，我们常见的AI Agent（AI代理），例如智能客服或自动化面试助手，已经在许多企业得到应用。但与Agentic AI相比，传统AI Agent仍然具有局限性。举个例子： AI Agent：只能回答员工关于公司福利的常见问题，比如“今年的年假政策是什么？” Agentic AI：不仅能回答问题，还能主动分析员工的休假情况，自动推荐合适的休假时间，并结合公司政策优化排班，确保业务顺利运行。 3. Agentic AI如何改变HR行业？随着Agentic AI的发展，HR的许多日常工作将发生巨变。以下是几个关键应用场景：（1）智能招聘与人才管理 Agentic AI可以帮助HR从简历筛选、面试安排到人才匹配实现全流程自动化。 ? 自动筛选简历：AI代理可通过自然语言处理（NLP）分析海量简历，并根据职位要求筛选最匹配的候选人。? 优化招聘流程：Agentic AI能够自主调整招聘策略，例如根据市场趋势调整岗位描述，优化招聘渠道，提高人才获取效率。? 智能面试安排：AI代理可以结合面试官和候选人的日程，自动安排面试，并实时调整时间，减少HR的重复沟通工作。（2）绩效评估与员工发展 HR部门可以利用Agentic AI来优化绩效考核体系，并制定个性化的员工成长路径。 ? 智能绩效评估：AI代理可实时分析员工的工作数据，提供个性化绩效反馈，帮助管理者更公平地评估员工表现。? 个性化职业发展：Agentic AI可以分析员工的职业路径，自动推荐合适的培训课程或晋升机会，帮助企业留住优秀人才。（3）员工体验与组织管理 AI可以提高员工满意度，并优化组织架构，提高整体效率。 ? 智能员工助手：AI代理可以主动提醒员工提交报销单、更新考勤信息，甚至预测员工的离职风险，并提前采取措施留住人才。? 企业文化管理：AI可以分析员工情绪，帮助HR团队制定更合适的企业文化建设方案。 4. 为什么2025年是“AI Agent之年”？ 2025年，Agentic AI的应用将迎来爆发式增长，这主要得益于以下三大趋势：（1）AI技术的成熟与算力提升随着大模型（如ChatGPT、NVIDIA NeMo）的不断升级，AI的推理能力越来越强，使得Agentic AI在HR场景下更加实用。（2）企业数字化转型加速全球范围内，企业正在加快HR数字化转型。Agentic AI能够帮助HR团队自动化重复性工作，让HR更专注于战略性任务，因此将被广泛应用。（3）人才市场变化与HR挑战后疫情时代，企业面临招聘难、员工流动性增加等挑战。Agentic AI可以通过智能化的人才管理系统，提高招聘效率、优化员工体验，并降低HR工作负担。 ? 预测：到2025年，超过50%的企业将引入Agentic AI，以优化HR管理流程。 5. HR如何准备迎接Agentic AI时代？ 2025年将是AI Agent之年，HR行业必须抓住这一变革机遇。以下是HR团队可以采取的三大行动： ✅ 学习Agentic AI相关知识，关注AI在HR领域的应用趋势，如AI招聘、智能绩效管理等。✅ 尝试小规模部署AI代理，比如在员工服务、招聘管理等领域测试AI解决方案。✅ 与AI厂商合作，寻找适合企业的AI解决方案，如NVIDIA、微软、谷歌等提供的Agentic AI技术支持。 HR的未来，不只是管理人，更是管理智能体！Agentic AI将成为HR行业的重要助手，助力企业迈向智能化管理新时代！ ? RAIHR倡导：实施负责任的AI（Responsible AI in HR, RAIHR）随着Agentic AI在HR行业的广泛应用，我们必须关注AI的伦理、安全和公平性问题。**RAIHR（Responsible AI in HR）**倡导企业在引入Agentic AI时，遵循以下三大原则，确保AI技术的透明性、公平性和责任性： ✅ 透明性（Transparency）：确保AI决策过程可解释，HR能够理解AI的筛选标准、考核指标，避免“黑箱”决策。✅ 公平性（Fairness）：AI招聘和绩效评估应避免算法偏见，确保候选人和员工得到公平、公正的对待。✅ 责任性（Accountability）：AI在HR领域的应用应遵循合规要求，确保数据安全，并提供人工复核机制，避免AI错误影响员工职业发展。 Agentic AI的未来，不仅是效率与智能的提升，更应是“负责任的AI”！HR行业需要共同努力，确保AI技术真正惠及企业与员工，让AI成为推动组织可持续发展的正向力量！ ?? 总结：Agentic AI将彻底改变HR工作方式 ? AI Agent vs. Agentic AI：传统AI Agent只是执行预设任务，而Agentic AI能自主学习、推理和优化。? HR应用场景：Agentic AI将在招聘、绩效评估、员工体验等方面发挥巨大作用。? 2025年是AI Agent之年：技术突破、企业数字化转型、HR挑战推动Agentic AI的全面应用。 ? 实施负责任的AI（Responsible AI in HR, RAIHR）我们必须关注AI的伦理、安全和公平性问题未来，HR不再是“人力资源管理者”，而是“AI智能管理者”！准备好迎接这场AI革命了吗？ ?

decision-making
2025年03月16日
decision-making

Josh Bersin:Digital Twins, Digital Employees, And Agents Everywhere 2025 年，数字员工和人工智能助理的崛起将彻底改变人力资源运营，改变招聘、数据分析和员工管理等任务。这些技术包括数字双胞胎和智能代理，它们将与人类专业人员一起工作，以提高生产力和优化工作流程。随着人工智能工具成为日常业务不可或缺的一部分，人力资源领导者必须拥抱这些创新，同时继续关注技能培训、心理健康和包容性工作环境。向人工智能的转变还将重塑团队动态，这对人力资源部门重新设计角色和流程以保持竞争力提出了挑战。 I recently heard Elon Musk predict that every citizen would have multiple Optimus robots in their homes within five years. And while I often ignore his predictions because they’re exaggerated, I think he’s on to something. We are about to witness an explosion of Digital Employees in our companies, and these may be the “robots” we’ve heard about for years. Let me explain. This week I talked with dozens of vendors and clients at Unleash and then visited our development partner Sana Labs in Stockholm. It’s now clear that we’re going to be working with multitudes of “digital employees” in the year ahead. (And as Dario Amodei, the founder of Anthropic explains, AI can do many more positive things in business, science, and health than we ever imagined.) By “digital employee” I mean a software powered agent that can talk with us, answer detailed questions, solve complex analytic problems, and navigate a multitude of systems. ChatGPT and its peers, which introduced the idea of an agent, has now spawned dozens of “agentic” use cases, which I’d be willing to refer to as personalities. Let me start with a “Digital Twin.” Imagine you have a superb customer service agent with years of experience helping your most demanding clients. If you load the last five years of their emails, coupled with all their internal documentation, and a log history of their last two years of service calls, you can essentially “create him or her” digitally with all the knowledge, style, and internal contacts this person has developed. This twin, which may look initially like an AI assistant, could then carry on this employee’s work when the real life worker is on vacation. One of our clients, a large insurance company, has already built “digital twins” for claims processing. If you think about the complexity and workflow of processing a claim, much of it could be learned by an agent, making the “claims robot” an expert on this important process. And as you change claims rules and limits, the agent will learn new guidelines in only seconds. Our AI assistant Galileo, a trained expert on HR (Galileo is trained on 25 years of research and thousands of conversations with clients and vendors), is essentially a “digital twin” of me and the other analysts in our firm. I’m not saying Galileo is as fun to talk with as we are, but I can assure you that he (or she) is as knowledgeable and supportive. And Galileo is even smarter than I am: he has instant knowledge of skills models, compensation benchmarks, turnover statistics, and other data bases which I can only access by looking them up on demand. And using the Sana platform we can configure Galileo to have multiple personalities. Galileo the “Recruitment Agent” might have in-depth knowledge of screening, interviewing, and candidate skills assessment and he may have direct linkage to SeekOut, Eightfold, or any other sourcing applications. In his candidate facing personality he may be able to answer candidate questions, explain shift schedules, and “sell” the company to top job candidates. (This is what Paradox has done for years and vendors like Eightfold and LinkedIn are launching now.) But there’s more. Imagine that this “digital twin” or “digital employee” has intimate knowledge of Workday, SuccessFactors, or a variety of other systems. Now the assistant can not only answer questions and help solve problems, he can also process transactions, look things up, and run reports against multiple system. The digital employee has turned into a “digital analyst,” who can find things and do work for you, saving you hours of effort in your daily life. (Vee from Visier is designed for this.) Suppose you ask your digital friend to attend meetings for you, participate in conversations on certain topics, and alert you in real time when urgent issues come up for discussion. He could help you scale your time, keep you informed about decisions you need to know about, and help you manage your action items. And the list goes on and on and on. Best of all, what if your digital twin can talk to you. Suppose he “checks in” with you about the project you asked for help with last week, so you inform him how things are going and he gets “smarter” about what you may need next. Galileo does this today, prompting you to dig into a problem and explore areas you may not have considered. And if you ask him about management or people issues, he could give you advice and coaching, based on the leadership models or even CEO interviews in your own company. (BetterUp, Valence and others are working on this.) This is not science fiction, my friends. All this is becoming reality and will certainly be common next year. Every vendor has a slightly different focus. The Microsoft Copilot specializes in MS Office-related activities, ServiceNow’s focuses on internal service and support, Galileo is focused on the needs of HR, and Joule is an expert on all the functions of SAP. Each of these “digital employees” needs training, feedback, and connections to stay current and relevant. So it’s doubtful that one digital employee will do everything. (Training a digital employee means managing his or her corpus of information, which will be a major new role in HR.) One thing is very clear: we are going to be living and working with these guys. And as we use them and see what they’re capable of, we’re going to redesign work. Little by little we’ll offload tasks, projects, and workflows. And as we do, we’ll get smarter and smarter about redesigning our teams. I liken the process to that of a carpenter who gets a new multi-function power drill. Before the drill he may have manually drilled holes, carefully selecting the drill bit and the level of pressure based on wood density. Now he drills holes faster, more accurately, and with more precision. Soon he just speeds through the process, spending more time on cabinet fit, finish, or design. The same thing will happen to our HR tasks, projects, and designs. And these new digital employees are programmable! So once we figure out what they’re capable of we can adjust them, customize them, and connect them together. Eventually we’ll have intelligent assistants that operate as entire applications. And that’s the threat to incumbent software companies – the agents hollow out many of our existing applications. How Do Our Digital Employees Impact Our Own Work? One more observation. Many a few of the clients I talked with kept asking “what about our softskills?” What work is truly human? I think that’s the wrong question. Rather we should ask the opposite: how much can I delegate to my new friends as fast as possible! Have you been upset that your vacuum cleaner took away the rewarding human work of sweeping a floor? How much joy do you get from washing dishes? Did your dishwasher make you feel deflated when you stopped splashing around in the soapy water? Of course not – these tools eliminated tasks we considered to be “drudgery.” Well today, thanks to digital assistants, creating a pivot table to do cross-tab analysis has become drudgery. You can stop getting your hands wet with that task – ask Galileo or Copilot to analyze the data, and then ask him to chart it, add more data, and try new assumptions. The more we learn to use these new digital employees the more “drudgery” we can stop doing. And consider complex “human-centered” activities like “change management.” A client asked me “how could Galileo help me with change management for our new HCM system?” I answered her with dozens of ideas: ask Galileo for case studies of other companies and have it build a checklist to consider based on what other companies did. Then ask Galileo to build a training plan; ask it to read the user documentation and create a table of what features are new; then ask Galileo to rewrite that change plan by role. And finally ask Galileo to write a press release about success, craft some compelling communications to employees, and ask it to compute the ROI of all the steps eliminated. These are all “manual” human tasks we do today and they take time and ingenuity to figure out. If you went through this process in Galileo you could ask your digital employee to save these steps and prompts in a “template,” and you have just taught your digital employee how to do change management. The next time you need him he can step you through the process. As I started to explain this to my client I stopped and said: wait a minute. I can’t possibly show you everything Galileo can do. You have to try it for yourself. And that’s my big message. Don’t wait for a vendor to drop a finished solution in your lap. These are intelligent, trainable, digital experts. You have to get to know them so you can figure out where they fit in your job, your projects, and your company. Just like you do with any new hire. I say it’s time to get started. No more sweeping floors or washing dishes by hand. Let’s meet our digital employees, tell them about our projects, and ask for their help. Step by step, day by day, we can redesign our jobs to be more more productive, liberating us to do greater things.

decision-making
2024年10月19日
decision-making

利用组织网络分析（ONA） - 衡量员工绩效并优化战略作者: Maya Bodan, Don Miller, Sue Cantrell, Gary Parilis, 和 Carissa Kilgour 在快速变化的工作环境中，传统的办公室、工作时间和组织结构已逐渐失效，组织需要新的洞察力来理解、衡量和评估员工的绩效。特别是现在，了解人们如何互动、互动模式如何影响业务结果以及如何调整行为以改善这些结果变得更加重要。数据分析和人工智能 (AI) 的创新使这一切成为可能。组织网络分析利用网络科学和特定指标来分析和可视化组织内部的沟通和信息流动。通过收集和分析调查和工作应用中的数据，组织可以利用数据、分析和 AI 的力量。组织网络分析揭示了传统组织结构图中没有的洞察力，例如人们如何协作、谁在决策中起到关键作用或者独立工作，以及关于信任和影响的情感。组织网络分析可以帮助领导者理解人际关系、可视化关系并找出成功的潜在障碍（图1）。图1: 组织网络分析可以帮助发现组织内部的协作衡量员工绩效业务结果可以通过多种方式衡量。有时具体的定量指标是适用的；例如，一个专注于生产力的网络营销团队可能会强调点击次数、下载次数或发布的社交媒体帖子数量。改进指标，如“将网络流量增加X％”，使团队能够创新实现这一目标的方法。其他业务结果包括质量率和客户保留率的衡量。然而，仅靠容易衡量的关键绩效指标并不能完整地呈现员工的生产力和业务影响。推动关系、发展和其他非量化人类结果的软性目标的结果对业务至关重要，尽管难以衡量。雇主需要创造员工重视的工作场所。德勤研究显示，79%的领导者认识到他们有责任为员工创造价值，但只有27%的员工认为他们的雇主正在取得有意义的进展。在当前质疑面对面工作价值的环境中，量化人类结果带来了挑战。组织网络分析为领导者提供了分析洞察，优先考虑以人为本的指标，优化工作场所策略以提升整体员工体验。理解个人员工绩效组织网络分析 (ONA) 的洞察力在结合评估个人和团队绩效时尤其有用，这些绩效衡量会影响业务结果或生产力。组织网络分析通过衡量与生产力相关的行为模式来评估生产力（需要对不同团队、职能和业务的生产力进行客观定义）。这些定义可以通过专家判断、焦点小组和访谈确定，或者通过数据分析进行量化。哪种模式是最优的取决于业务情况和需求。例如，有时，广泛的网络互动（与团队外部合作）是必要的，而在其他情况下，这可能会分散注意力——与直接同事合作是最好的（孤立的团队也可以是好的）。非正式影响者通常不同于组织的正式领导者，他们可以提供关于如何独立于正式层级结构高效工作的宝贵视角。这些洞察力展示了员工人口在整个网络中的分布，以及职能、业务单元或地理位置等因素如何影响团队动态和生产力。在一个无边界的组织中，员工绩效超越了传统指标，突出了对非正式协作可见性的重要性。组织网络分析可以揭示隐藏的洞察力，展示信息在组织内部的真实流动方式，给领导者提供做出明智决策和优化员工绩效的洞察。利用 ONA 优化工作场所策略组织在平衡面对面和虚拟互动方面面临挑战。尽管许多组织鼓励员工返回办公室，期望面对面的互动能提升员工绩效和创新，但需要对人们如何实际工作的细致理解。高管希望办公室工作能激发创造力和联系，但往往面临昂贵的长期房地产承诺未得到充分利用的压力，这增加了定义办公室目的和价值的难度。通勤也会增加环境足迹，员工可能不愿失去灵活性。通过组织网络分析，领导者可以回答一些关键问题：有多少团队成员是共址的？在什么情况下以及为什么需要共址？什么工作可以或最好独立完成？哪些工具和应用程序最能支持不同地点的工作？一个重要因素是现场密度，它衡量一个人在办公室内近距离合作者网络的比例。更高的现场密度与更高的面对面工作的认可度相关。领导者可以利用组织网络分析的洞察来了解谁应该在一起工作以及何时在一起工作。理解这些非正式网络和影响范围可以为领导者解锁巨大的价值，以确定哪些团队应该共址以及共址时如何组织空间。通过虚拟方式沟通的独立工作者可能在办公室工作中看到的收益有限。有趣的是，新的数据显示“在松散联系网络中更可能产生创意”，这意味着与自己的直接网络外的合作可以促进创新。结论组织应负责任地使用数据、分析和 AI，以实时洞察员工在当今工作环境中的操作、协作和战略。这种改进的理解可以在多个组织层面支持价值创造和决策。组织网络分析提供了有关员工如何在混合工作模式和远程工作模式中跨职能和地理“边界”协作的绩效洞察，可以帮助领导层制定工作场所策略和政策。作者 Maya Bodan Don Miller Sue Cantrell Gary Parilis Carissa Kilgour 贡献者 Yuki Iwase Shruti Kalaiselvan Ramyasri T M Brennan Conway Katherine Arriola 尾注 1 Deloitte, “Using network analysis to build an agile organization: Create organizational collaboration in a remote workplace,” 2020年10月27日。 2 Stephen Lancaster-Hall 等人, Humanizing productivity and performance: Productivity and performance in times of disruption, Deloitte, 2020; Deloitte, Beyond productivity: The journey to the quantified organization, 2023年5月。 3 Deloitte, Beyond Productivity: The journey to the quantified organization, 2023年5月。 4 Sue Cantrell 和 Corrie Commisso, “Outcomes over outputs: Why productivity is no longer the metric that matters most,” Deloitte Insights, 2023年7月19日。 5 Steve Hatfield, “Rethinking the ways we look at productivity in a Work from Anywhere world: How to evaluate remote worker productivity post-pandemic,” Deloitte’s Capital H blog, 2021年8月24日。 6 Worklytics, “12 metrics for more effective meetings,” 访问时间 2024年1月4日。 7 Deloitte Insights, New fundamentals for a boundaryless world: 2023 Global Human Capital Trends Report, 2023, 第80页。来源：https://www2.deloitte.com/us/en/blog/human-capital-blog/2024/harnessing-organization-network-analysis.html

decision-making
2024年06月19日

decision-making

赋能未来的工作：生成式AI驱动的组织网络分析和高绩效团队 Empowering the Future of Work: Generative AI-Powered ONA and High-Performing Teams 现代职场正经历从僵化的等级制度向敏捷、动态网络的转变。这一转变的核心动力是生成式AI驱动的组织网络分析（Organizational Network Analysis，简称ONA）。这种尖端技术使小型、专注且具备多学科能力的团队能够独立完成任务，正在重塑企业的运营方式。敏捷团队的崛起在当今快节奏的商业环境中，敏捷性的需求比以往任何时候都更为重要。公司正从传统的孤立结构转向小型多学科团队的模式。这些团队通常被称为“squads”或“pods”，它们的设计目的是灵活、专注和自主运作，其特点是能够独立运作，快速高效地交付价值。挑战：应对复杂性然而，创建和管理这些团队并非易事。在复杂的组织中，理解关系、专业知识和沟通渠道的相互作用对于构建有效团队至关重要。这正是组织网络分析（ONA）派上用场的地方。ONA提供了关于信息流动、关键影响者以及组织内沟通瓶颈的洞察。生成式AI驱动的ONA：游戏规则改变者生成式AI驱动的ONA正在彻底改变公司理解和优化内部网络的方式。通过AI分析和建模组织关系，这项技术提供了团队互动和协作的动态实时视图。创建小型专注的团队 ONA帮助识别自然合作良好的员工群体。通过分析沟通模式和协作网络，AI驱动的ONA突出了与项目目标一致的潜在团队配置。这确保了团队是小型、专注的，并由互补技能的个体组成。使用生成式AI驱动的ONA进行小队组建。来源：Cognitive Talent Solutions 生成式AI驱动的队伍组建建议。来源：Cognitive Talent Solutions 赋能自主决策生成式AI驱动的ONA识别团队中的关键影响者和决策者。通过了解谁在群体中拥有“社会资本”，公司可以赋予这些个体代表团队做出决策的权力，从而促进自主性，减少对高层管理批准的依赖通过生成式AI驱动的ONA识别非正式领导者。来源：Cognitive Talent Solutions 增强多学科协作 ONA揭示了跨职能连接，帮助公司创建带来多样专业知识的多学科团队。这促进了创新，并确保团队具备从头到尾完成任务所需的技能。实时监控和调整生成式AI驱动的ONA提供团队动态的实时洞察。通过持续监控沟通模式和协作指标，公司可以在问题升级前识别并解决问题，确保团队保持有效和专注于目标。影响：驱动创新和效率生成式AI驱动的ONA对团队绩效的影响深远。通过赋能小型、专注的团队，企业可以实现以下关键收益：增加创新：多学科团队带来多样的视角，促成创造性问题解决和创新。提高效率：自主团队能够快速决策，减少瓶颈，加速项目进程。增强参与度：赋能的团队拥有更高的工作满意度和参与度，导致更低的离职率和更投入的员工队伍。提高敏捷性：小型专注的团队能够快速应对变化的市场条件，提供竞争优势。结论：团队合作的未来生成式AI驱动的ONA是创建和管理高绩效团队的强大工具。通过理解和利用组织内的复杂网络，公司可以使小型、专注、赋能的多学科团队从头到尾独立运作。这不仅驱动了创新和效率，还为更敏捷和响应迅速的未来工作奠定了基础。随着职场的不断演变，拥抱生成式AI驱动的ONA将是保持领先并构建在变化中茁壮成长的团队的关键。

decision-making
2024年05月25日
decision-making

您需要了解的 19 个最重要的人力资源指标 In the complex, ever-evolving realm of human resources, effective decision-making is anchored in data-specific insights. This underlines the significance of HR metrics, which serve as key navigational beacons in the journey of driving business success. These metrics, or key performance indicators (KPI) – do not mix them with Key Result Areas (KRA), transform abstract aspects of HR management into quantifiable data, which can be measured, analyzed, and optimized. In this review, we will navigate through the 19 most crucial HR metrics, offering HR professionals and business leaders a comprehensive understanding of these powerful analytical tools. Table of Contents Key HR Metrics Number of Employees (FTEs) Employee Turnover Rate Voluntary Turnover Rate Employee Net Promoter Score (eNPS) Employee Engagement Employee Satisfaction Employee Experience Employee Value Recruitment Metrics Time to Hire Time to Fill Cost of Hire Compensation and Benefits Metrics Salary Range Penetration Salary Averages Pay Equity Pay Gap Gender Pay Gap Talent Development Metrics Employee Growth Rate Retention Rates Employee Performance Metrics Summary At the helm of these metrics are those concerning workforce management. Metrics such as employee turnover rate, retention rate, and absenteeism rate offer profound insights into the dynamics of the workforce. These HR metrics allow teams to assess workforce stability and employee engagement, and are instrumental in highlighting areas that need remedial action, contributing to enhancing workforce efficiency and fostering a positive organizational culture. Moreover, the spectrum of HR metrics extends to illuminate performance-based aspects, using data points like productivity rate, performance score, and training effectiveness. These metrics are invaluable in tracking skill enhancement, individual and team performances, and the efficacy of training initiatives. By analyzing these HR metrics, HR Managers can optimize talent management strategies, assisting in the creation of a high-performing, competitive workforce. Another significant category involves financial aspects including compensation competitiveness ratio and the cost of hiring. By yielding a clear perspective of the financial implications of HR policies, these metrics enable organizations to ensure their reward structures are market-competitive and recruitment processes are cost-effective. Armed with these HR metrics, management can strike an optimal balance between employee satisfaction and the organization’s financial health. 19 Most Important HR Metrics To encapsulate, the knowledge and understanding of these 19 imperative HR metrics provide a robust framework for strategic decision making in HR management. Each data point, each metric acts like a compass directing towards greater business success. They bravely shine the light on areas of improvement, success, and stagnation. By intelligently utilizing these HR metrics as outlined in the HRM Guide, HR leaders stand poised to significantly augment their human resource initiatives, thereby strengthening the backbone of their organizations. The relationship between HR Metrics and HR Analytics forms a powerful synergy that fuels informed decision-making. While HR Metrics offer quantifiable indicators of HR policies’ efficiency and effectiveness, HR Analytics dives deeper, harnessing these metrics to glean crucial insights and derive data-driven conclusions. This confluence of metrics and analytics is central to enhancing the overall effectiveness of HR management, ensuring that decisions made are grounded in empirical evidence and tailored to the organization’s evolving needs. In essence, the symbiosis between HR Metrics and HR Analytics paves the way for continuous improvement and strategic foresight, standing testament to the commitment of HR teams and organizations in nurturing and safeguarding the success of their people. Key HR Metrics In the sphere of Human Resource Management, informed decision-making is the cornerstone of effective practice. It is this that underscores the quintessential value of Key HR Metrics. These quantitative indicators reflect the efficiency and effectiveness of HR policies and operations, generating valuable insights that guide business strategy. Harnessing these metrics equips HR practitioners with a robust toolkit to measure, analyze, and optimize various aspects of HR processes. Navigating this vast array of metrics, a few distinguish themselves for their impact and universality. Among these are the Employee Net Promoter Score (eNPS), Employee Turnover Rate, and several other vital measures. The eNPS, a definitive metric of employee loyalty and job satisfaction, offers a transparent lens into the internal health of an organization. On the other hand, the Employee Turnover Rate stands as an indicator of organizational stability and workforce retention capacity. Thorough exploration and seamless integration of these key metrics play a pivotal role in honing effective HR strategies. Number of Employees (FTEs) Nestled within the cascade of HR metrics, the ‘Number of Employees’ or ‘Full-Time Equivalent’ (FTE) stands out as a fundamental measure of an organization’s human capital. This metric tracks the total number of full-time employees within the organization, encapsulating the breadth of the workforce at a glance. Understood across industries, FTE refers to the number of full-time employees that could have been employed if the reported number of hours worked by part-time employees had been worked by full-time employees. While seemingly straightforward, the value derived from this key metric extends far beyond a cursory headcount. A clear understanding of the Number of Employees (FTEs) serves as a vital foundation for resource planning and analysis. It aids in assessing the organization’s growth and expansion capacity, mapping the trajectory of workforce development, and determining if current staffing levels are aligned with the business goals. It also provides a clear picture of the scale at which HR policies and procedures operate, reinforcing the significance of understanding this measure within the larger HR Analytics structure. Ultimately, the metric mirrors the size and complexity of an organization’s human resources, guiding critical decisions about recruitment, retention, and resource allocation to align with the organization’s strategic objectives. Employee Turnover Rate Among the essential HR Metrics, the Employee Turnover Rate holds significant weight as a measure of workforce stability. This crucial metric gauges the rate at which employees exit an organization within a specified time frame, reflecting the tempo of attrition. An elevated turnover rate may be a symptom of underlying issues with job satisfaction, company culture, or a disconnect between employee expectations and organizational realities. By monitoring and analyzing this metric, HR specialists and business leaders alike can glean crucial insights into the overall health and attractiveness of their workplace. Understanding the Employee Turnover Rate assists organizations in identifying areas in need of improvement and implementing targeted interventions. A high turnover rate can profoundly impact a company’s bottom line, as the loss of experienced personnel often leads to increased recruitment costs and decreased productivity. Additionally, it may negatively affect the morale of the remaining workforce, as employees witness their peers departing, potentially eroding the organization’s internal cohesion. Conversely, a low Employee Turnover Rate often speaks to a thriving and nurturing work environment where employees are content and well-supported. It signifies that the organization has been successful in fostering a positive company culture, attractive compensation packages, and opportunities for personal and professional growth. Analyzing this metric in tandem with other HR Metrics, such as Employee Retention Rate and Employee satisfaction, can provide a comprehensive and holistic picture of the employee experience within the organization. To sum up, the Employee Turnover Rate is an indispensable tool that allows HR professionals to recognize the strengths and weaknesses of their talent management strategies effectively. Pivoting their initiatives and interventions based on this data, organizations are better equipped to create a more stable, engaged, and high-performing workforce. Recognizing the immense value of this metric and taking proactive steps to address unwanted fluctuations is a testament to an organization’s commitment to its people’s success and well-being. Voluntary Turnover Rate In the sphere of human resource management, deciphering the dynamics of employee attrition is of paramount importance. Here, an essential metric that provides specific insights is the Voluntary Turnover Rate. Distinct from overall turnover, this metric zeroes in on the number of employees who willingly choose to leave the organization. By analyzing this key performance indicator, HR managers and business leaders gain valuable understanding into the effectiveness of their employee retention strategies and overall workplace health. Unveiling the reasons behind voluntary departures empowers organizations to address potential lapses in their offerings and policies. Common drivers of voluntary turnover may include a lack of career advancement opportunities, insufficient compensation, or a misalignment of personal values with the organization’s culture. Identifying such factors through the lens of the Voluntary Turnover Rate enables HR teams to proactively design and implement relevant programs, cultivating a more nurturing, engaging work environment. Moreover, tracking the Voluntary Turnover Rate in combination with other HR metrics, such as Employee Satisfaction and Employee Retention Rate, can provide a comprehensive overview of employee engagement and commitment. By addressing the issues highlighted by these interrelated metrics, organizations ensure that they maintain a content and productive workforce willing to contribute to the company’s long-term vision. The Voluntary Turnover Rate serves as an eye-opening metric for understanding an organization’s employee retention capabilities. Through skillful analysis and thoughtful response, HR departments and business leaders can utilize this metric to sharpen their talent management strategies, sustain a resilient workforce, and ultimately, fortify their organization’s foundation by fostering a committed and satisfied team of professionals. Employee Net Promoter Score (eNPS) In the multifaceted domain of human resources, the Employee Net Promoter Score (eNPS) emerges as a powerful tool to measure employee satisfaction and engagement. This metric gauges the loyalty of employees by posing a simple, yet insightful question: How likely are they to recommend the company as a place to work? Built on the premise of the Net Promoter Score concept used in customer satisfaction, the eNPS distills the essence of employee sentiment into meaningful key data points that reflect their commitment and attachment to the organization. A profound understanding of the Employee Net Promoter Score offers HR professionals and business leaders not merely a numerical score, but valuable insights into the health and vitality of their organizational culture. By monitoring the fluctuations of this pivotal metric, organizations can identify trends, recognize areas of success, and spot aspects of the work environment that might require redress and reinforcement. Furthermore, the analysis of the eNPS in conjunction with related HR metrics provides a holistic perspective on the many elements influencing employee satisfaction. For instance, evaluating eNPS alongside Employee Turnover Rate or Employee Retention Rate can illuminate the intricate relationship between overall satisfaction and workforce stability. By harnessing the power of these interrelated data points, HR teams can tailor their strategies and interventions, ultimately fostering a nurturing environment that engenders employee commitment and loyalty. The Employee Net Promoter Score remains a cornerstone within the portfolio of HR metrics for assessing employee satisfaction and engagement. The wisdom and understanding that arise from the skillful interpretation of eNPS pave the way for optimizing employee experience and cultivating a resilient organization deeply invested in the success of its people. Embracing the opportunity to learn from the eNPS reflects an organization’s commitment to fostering a thriving culture, where employee satisfaction and well-being are at the core of its mission. Employee Engagement Employee Engagement is a vital HR metric that gauges the emotional investment and commitment of employees towards their work and the company. This measurement helps gauge the level of enthusiasm, loyalty, and dedication employees have for their roles within the organization. It directly impacts key performance indicators, such as productivity, turnover, and overall organizational performance. Simply put, employee engagement stems from the deeply human need for fulfillment in one’s work and plays a decisive role in the success of an organization. Delving deeper into Employee Engagement unveils its significance. High engagement levels often translate into a more motivated, resilient workforce that achieves higher productivity levels and fosters a lower turnover rate. Engaged employees are typically more loyal, invest greater effort into their work, and are likely to go the extra mile for the company’s success. Additionally, they form the backbone of a positive workplace culture, contributing to a harmonious, cooperative work environment. However, measuring Employee Engagement can be challenging, as it encompasses various key data points, including job satisfaction, loyalty, pride in their work, and the quality of relationships with co-workers and supervisors. Various tools like surveys and feedback sessions can gather these data points, which, when analyzed together, can provide a composite picture of the organization’s engagement health. In essence, Employee Engagement is an invaluable measurement within the HR metrics spectrum. Its findings shed light on the pulse of the organization, highlighting areas that require optimization to enhance job satisfaction, increase loyalty, and improve overall performance. Prioritizing and nurturing Employee Engagement reflects an organization’s commitment to its most critical resource – its people. It is a testament to the organization’s dedicated pursuit of achieving success by building a highly engaged and motivated workforce. Employee Satisfaction Within the dimensions of Human Resources Management, the metric of Employee Satisfaction stands as a direct barometer of how content employees are. It comprehensively measures their satisfaction levels with aspects like job roles, the work environment, organizational policies, and workflows. This critical metric transcends the mundane statistics, illuminating the subjective experiences and feelings of employees towards their workplace. Central to the robustness of the HR Processes, Employee Satisfaction harbors the potential to significantly influence an organization’s success trajectory. A workforce that is satisfied with their roles, feels valued, and finds alignment with organizational policies tends to exhibit higher productivity, lower turnover rates, and greater levels of engagement. It also underscores the positive aspects of an organization’s culture, reinforcing its attractiveness to prospective talent and bolstering its reputation in the job market. By undertaking regular Employee Satisfaction surveys and making this assessment an integral part of their Human Resources Management, organizations can amass valuable insights. These key data points then serve as a compass to navigate the planning and execution of HR policies, correcting course where needed and thus ensuring an environment that promotes satisfaction. To conclude, Employee Satisfaction (aka Employee Happiness) is not merely a measure of contentment. It is a testament to the effectiveness of the HR processes and the overall health of an organization. Prioritizing this critical metric helps build a workforce that is not just satisfied, but also engaged, productive, and committed to driving the organization’s success. Employee Experience A core metric within the domain of Human Resources Management is the Employee Experience. This term encompasses an employee’s entire journey within an organization, encapsulating every touchpoint from recruitment to exit. It includes their encounters with the organization’s culture, work environment, management philosophy, and HR Operating Rhythm. Essentially, it reflects how an employee perceives their interaction with the organization at large, offering a panoramic view of their professional journey. The depth and breadth of the Employee Experience shed light on critical aspects of the Human Resources Management strategy. It helps identify potential areas for improvement, and, perhaps more importantly, areas that are working well. This measure is not confined to the individual employee’s direct work-related tasks; it extends to cover the overarching environment, company culture, and sentiment within the organization. A positive experience fosters a feeling of inclusion, boosts engagement, improves job satisfaction, and reinforces a sense of loyalty. Accurate measurement of the Employee Experience requires a detailed understanding of the organization’s HR Operating Rhythm. It calls for a systematic, disciplined approach to assess each phase of an employee’s journey, from onboarding and integration to growth and eventually, their exit. Regular feedback sessions, pulse surveys, and open communication channels can serve as tools for capturing the nuances of Employee Experience reliably. The Employee Experience stands as a pillar in the realm of HR metrics. A thorough understanding of this metric empowers Human Resources Management to create a fulfilling, rewarding environment that positively influences every facet of the employees’ professional lives. In prioritizing Employee Experience, an organization reinforces its commitment to its most valuable asset–its people. This is instrumental in building a strong, vibrant, and high-performing workplace where each individual is fully engaged and aligned with the company’s vision and direction. Employee Value In the strategic framework of human resource management, Employee Value emerges as a critical metric. This term encapsulates the aggregate contribution an employee brings to an organization, assessed in light of key facets such as productivity, innovation, and teamwork. Effectively, it quantifies the unique worth of each employee within the organization, detailing their individual impacts on overall company performance. An employee’s value is intrinsically linked to their productivity. Higher employee productivity often directly translates to greater value for the organization. However, this metric extends beyond merely measuring task completion rates or output levels. It also encompasses the innovative capacities of the employee–their potential and demonstrated ability to introduce or improve processes, ideas, or products, thereby contributing to the organization’s evolution and growth. Further, the concept of Employee Value embraces the power of teamwork, recognizing the synergistic effects of cooperative, harmonious office relationships. The quality of interactions and collaborations, the readiness to assist colleagues, and the ability to effectively function within a team all contribute to an individual’s cumulative value to an organization. Understanding these dimensions through the lens of Employee Value illuminates the factors driving both individual and collective successes. The Employee Value stands as a comprehensive measure of an employee’s impact on an organization. It encompasses not only the tangible output in terms of employee productivity but also the softer aspects of innovation capacity and teamwork. A nuanced understanding and application of the Employee Value metric play a pivotal role in empowering HR leaders and business leaders alike, enabling them to enhance talent management strategies, foster a productive workplace, and drive their organization toward unparalleled success. Recruitment Metrics Recruitment Metrics serve as indispensable tools for HR managers and business leaders striving to optimize their talent acquisition process. These essential performance indicators, including time-to-hire, time-to-fill, and cost-of-hire, enable organizations to assess the efficacy, speed, and cost-effectiveness of their recruitment frameworks. By evaluating these key metrics, decision-makers can ensure that their talent acquisition strategies are aligned with the organization’s broader objectives while providing a seamless experience for both candidates and hiring managers. Central to the HR metrics ecosystem, Recruitment Metrics hold the key to detecting areas requiring streamlining, improvement, or an outright transformation in the recruitment journey. A comprehensive understanding of these metrics allows an organization to stay competitive in the job market, attract top talent, and fine-tune their recruitment strategies to bolster their workforce. In this context, time-to-hire, time-to-fill, and cost-of-hire metrics emerge as vital signposts guiding organizations toward the best practices for finding, hiring, and retaining exceptional candidates while striving for operational excellence. Time to Hire In the panorama of HR metrics, Time to Hire emerges as a key measure of efficiency within the recruitment process. It succinctly outlines the duration from when a job is posted to when a candidate accepts the offered role. A shorter Time to Hire often stands as an indicator of a more streamlined and efficient hiring process, reflecting the effectiveness of the recruitment strategies employed by an organization. Assessing Time to Hire provides valuable insights into the speed and efficacy of the recruitment function. A brief duration could signal a well-structured and efficient system capable of quickly attracting, evaluating, and securing suitable candidates. It may also imply a positive working relationship with hiring managers, facilitating swift decision-making and expediting the overall recruitment process. Conversely, a lengthier Time to Hire could indicate possible inefficiencies or bottlenecks that are slowing down the recruitment cycle. These could range from a lengthy decision-making process, difficulties in attracting the right candidates, to perhaps the absence of a robust recruitment platform or system. Understanding and analyzing this metric empowers an organization to undertake necessary revisions or enhancements to the recruitment process. Time to Hire is an essential recruitment metric, offering quantifiable evidence of the strengths and potential weak links within an organization’s recruitment process. Regular monitoring of this metric enables HR hiring specialists to uphold the efficiency and effectiveness of their recruitment practices, ensuring the organization remains competitive in the dynamic talent acquisition landscape. Having an optimized Time to Hire helps harness the full potential of the recruitment process, ensuring timely talent acquisition that aligns with the strategic growth objectives of the organization. Time to Fill At the heart of an organization’s talent acquisition process stands the crucial recruitment metric known as Time to Fill. This metric gauges the amount of time it takes to fill a vacant position, stretching from the moment a job opening is identified to the point when the selected candidate steps into the role. Time to Fill shines light on the efficiency of an organization’s hiring practices, offering valuable insights into potential bottlenecks or areas that may warrant improvement. A shorter Time to Fill typically reflects a well-orchestrated recruitment process, where vacant positions are rapidly filled, minimizing the adverse impacts of extended vacancies on the organization’s operational efficiency. Conversely, a protracted duration can signal complexities within the talent acquisition process that may require streamlining, or a case of substantial applicant volume making candidate selection challenging. Analyzing Time to Fill enables HR managers and business leaders to reveal and address any inefficiencies, reinforcing smoother, more effective hiring practices. Developing an understanding of Time to Fill is fundamental in fostering a more efficient talent acquisition process. Through the identification of friction points, organizations can take targeted measures such as optimizing job descriptions, refining selection criteria, or enhancing the interview process. These tailored strategies contribute to a more agile and proficient recruitment system, resulting in a competitive advantage in the quest for top talent. In summary, the Time to Fill metric serves as a vital indicator of the productivity and effectiveness of an organization’s talent acquisition process. Identifying areas for improvement can bolster overall efficiency, ensuring that businesses are well-positioned to swiftly hire the brilliant minds required to drive the organization to new heights. This metric not only measures the speed of the recruitment process but also signifies the organization’s commitment to selecting the best candidates for the job, thereby contributing to a sustainable, high-performing workforce. Cost of Hire In the realm of effective talent management strategies, understanding the Cost of Hire is of paramount importance. This financial metric delves into the costs associated with filling a vacant position, encompassing both direct and indirect expenses incurred during the talent acquisition process. Direct costs include job advertising fees, agency or recruiter fees, and background check costs. Indirect costs may incorporate time spent on candidate sourcing, interviewing, and onboarding across different organizational departments. A comprehensive overview of Cost of Hire offers indispensable insights to HR team members and business leaders, enabling them to evaluate their organizations’ recruitment efficiency and overall competitiveness. Evaluating the Cost of Hire is crucial in optimizing talent acquisition strategies, which, in turn, can profoundly influence an organization’s long-term success. By monitoring this metric, decision-makers can identify areas where cost savings and process improvements can be realized, minimizing excessive recruitment expenditure without compromising on the quality of hires. A solid grasp of Cost of Hire supports resource allocation and budgeting decisions, ensuring that organizations remain agile and capable of attracting top talent in the increasingly competitive job market. Efficient Cost of Hire management is vital to the sustenance and growth of an organization. By streamlining the talent acquisition process, HR professionals and business leaders can balance cost control with the pursuit of high-quality candidates, ultimately fostering a strong and vibrant workforce. Continued investment into refining recruitment strategies and processes will contribute to reductions in Cost of Hire while also positioning companies as attractive destinations for top talent. Assessing and managing the Cost of Hire is integral to the development and optimization of a company’s talent acquisition process. By examining these costs and identifying areas of potential improvement, organizations can refine their recruitment strategies, strike a balance between cost-efficiency, and quality hires, and solidify their foundation for enduring success. As a critical component of the recruitment metrics toolkit, the Cost of Hire serves as a key investment in the prosperity and future of the organization and its employees. Compensation and Benefits Metrics Amplifying the potency of an organization’s human resources strategy necessitates a comprehensive understanding of Compensation and Benefits Metrics. These crucial benchmarks, encapsulating aspects like pay gaps, salary averages, and more, guide HR managers and business leaders in making informed decisions about their organizations’ compensation structures. With these metrics at their disposal, professionals are better equipped to foster a fair, competitive, and enticing workplace, uplifting both employee satisfaction and organizational performance. Beyond merely representing numbers, Compensation and Benefits Metrics carry significant implications for talent acquisition, retention, and overall employee engagement. Drawing a clear picture of current compensation structures and comparing them to market standards can yield deep insights and illuminate areas for potential improvement. By closing pay gaps, aligning salary averages with industry standards, and delivering competitive benefits packages, organizations can showcase a palpable commitment to their employees’ welfare, ultimately underpinning a rock-solid foundation for sustainable success. Salary Range Penetration At the nexus of effective compensation management is the critical metric known as Salary Range Penetration. This evaluates how closely an employee’s salary matches the market or industry standards, ensuring businesses offer a competitive compensation package. Here, the Total Cost of compensation incorporates the entire salary spectrum—from minimum to maximum—considering various job roles and levels within an organization. The central role of Salary Range Penetration is to measure the employee’s pay position within the organization’s established salary range. This can help determine if the compensation offered aligns with industry benchmarks and remains attractive to both the current workforce and potential hires. By understanding where an employee’s salary stands in relation to these ranges, HR managers and business leaders can make informed decisions about pay increases, promotions, or adjustments needed to remain competitive. An efficient Salary Range Penetration system is vital for HR Compensation and Benefits managers in maintaining equity and transparency in compensation practices. Regular reviews and adjustments inspired by this metric can ensure the workforce feels valued, subsequently fostering higher levels of job satisfaction and commitment. By being mindful of this metric, organizations can shape an equitable pay structure that securely aligns the interest of employees and the strategic objectives of the company. Salary Range Penetration offers in-depth insights that fuel fair and competitive pay structures within organizations. By constantly monitoring and adjusting this measure, organizations can ensure their compensation strategies align with market standards, positively impacting employee satisfaction, and, ultimately, retention. Recognizing and acting upon the nuances of this metric is an investment in your people’s contentment and your organization’s long-term success. Salary Averages In the realm of fair and competitive compensation practices, understanding the concept of Salary Averages stands central. Salary Averages refer to the mean salary within an organization or a specific role. It essentially entails a comprehensive evaluation of the sum of all salaries divided by the total number of employees. This metric enables HR professionals and managers to maintain a balance in their internal pay structure while also considering relevant external costs. The value of Salary Averages is reflected in its ability to influence both internal and external costs tied to employee compensation. Internally, it aids in maintaining equity within the organization, ensuring a balanced distribution of compensation centered around fair market value. Externally, comprehending this metric efficiently allows companies to remain competitive in the market by offering attractive compensation packages that can attract and retain talent. Calculating and monitoring Salary Averages affords organizations a clearer lens through which to view potential disparities or imbalances in their pay structure. By identifying these gaps, companies can take corrective measures to ensure equitable pay among employees, fostering an environment of transparency and fairness. This conscious and conscientious practice not only strengthens employee relations but also encourages a more dedicated and motivated workforce. Salary Averages serve as a critical component of a balanced and competitive compensation practice. The insights derived from it throw light on both internal and external costs associated with employee compensation. This, in turn, equips organizations with the knowledge needed to ensure a fair, transparent, and competitive remuneration system—an instrumental cornerstone to fostering a satisfied and high-performing workforce. Pay Equity Centered at the heart of a constructive, diverse, and inclusive workforce is the core HR metric known as Pay Equity. It ensures that all employees receive fair compensation for their work and contributions, regardless of their gender or other demographic factors. The primary purpose of this metric is to foster a culture of equality, aligning with the principles of diversity and inclusion. Pay Equity helps eliminate unjustifiable disparities in the workforce relating to compensation. It is a reflection of an organization’s commitment towards upholding fairness by assessing and adjusting pay scales based solely on factors such as role, experience, and performance. With Pay Equity, HR leaders and business leaders commit to a critical investment in ensuring that their compensation practices do not discriminate but, instead, respect diversity and promote inclusion. Practicing Pay Equity necessitates regular monitoring and adjustments of pay strategies. It may involve conducting equity audits, examining pay practices, and implementing relevant policies that ensure fair compensation. The process extends beyond just remuneration and reflects the organization’s values, translating to higher employee satisfaction, improved employer branding, and fostering a culture that truly values diversity and inclusion. Pay Equity is not merely a metric; it’s an organizational commitment towards fostering a workplace culture that upholds the principles of equality, diversity, and inclusion. By driving pay practices that ensure equitable compensation, businesses can strengthen their employer brand, enhance employee loyalty, and build a robust foundation of trust and mutual respect. Pay Equity, thus, is less a choice and more a responsibility that organizations must shoulder in their quest for sustainable success. Pay Gap In the landscape of fair and equitable compensation practices, addressing the issue of the Pay Gap is a non-negotiable priority. Broadly speaking, this term refers to variations in pay across not only genders but also across different demographic, racial, and cultural groups. Comprehensive understanding of the concept of Pay Gap ensures that organizations adopt a sincerely fair approach to employees, emphasizing the principle of internal equity in compensation models. The Pay Gap is not merely about discerning salary discrepancies; it provides important insights into deeper systemic issues that might exist within an organization. Adjusting for these gaps is crucial for fostering a sense of fairness among employees and maintaining internal equity. This involves understanding these differences, identifying their origins, and devising systematic interventions to ensure equitable pay across all levels and roles. Efficient management of the Pay Gap necessitates close collaboration with HR managers and business leaders. This involves scrutinizing internal salary data, benchmarking against external markets, and rolling out policies that uphold equitable compensation. The commitment to narrowing and eventually eliminating the Pay Gap is a testament to an organization’s dedication to a fair approach to employees. Addressing the Pay Gap is a critical step towards establishing fairness and equality in compensation across all layers of an organization. Tackling this problem fosters a sense of internal equity, resulting in improved employee morale and productivity. As directly linked to a fair approach to employees, successful management of the Pay Gap is a substantial boon to the overall organizational health and reputation. Gender Pay Gap In the spectrum of fair compensation, addressing the Gender Pay Gap is of paramount importance. This metric underlines the salary disparity between male and female employees performing the same work. The alignment of the Gender Pay Gap to equitable pay scales is key in promoting workplace equality and maintaining internal equity. Firstly, let’s understand what the Gender Pay Gap is. It’s the differential between the average earnings of male and female employees, considering they are in identical roles with similar experience and performance. A noteworthy point is that a “gap” indicates a disparity, not justified by professional factors, signaling that there are elements beyond work performance influencing compensation. Such inequalities can undermine the spirit of fairness, negatively impacting the work environment and an organization’s ethical stature. The inevitability of addressing the Gender Pay Gap signals a commitment towards valuing a fair and balanced compensation strategy. By recognizing and actively responding to these discrepancies, organizations cement their commitment to internal equity. Revisiting pay structures, conducting thorough equity audits, and cultivating an environment of open dialogue about compensation are measures that can help in overcoming these challenges. Analyzing and working to lessen the Gender Pay Gap is more than an HR metric; it is a significant stride towards forging an equitable, inclusive workplace. The conscious examination and rectification of these disparities serve as a testament to an organization’s investment in their people, contributing to enhanced organizational morale and overall productivity. Prioritizing a sphere of pay equality is a critical contributor to achieving internal equity in the workplace. Talent Development Metrics In the evolving landscape of Human Resources, the collection, analysis, and interpretation of HR Metrics form a cornerstone for success. One subset of these vital metrics, particularly significant for both the HR Professional and the holistic growth of an organization, is the realm of Talent Development Metrics. These work to quantitatively measure the efficiency and impact of the organization’s talent development and training programs, fueling strategic decision-making and enhancing overall operational efficiency. Talent Development Metrics offer insight into the effectiveness of the company’s employee development strategies. These metrics range from gauging the reach, relevance, and responsiveness of training programs to measuring resultant employee performance and retention levels. While effectively broadening the scope of traditional employee metrics, these data points serve as a critical tool in assessing employee skill growth, job satisfaction, and, ultimately, boosting business productivity. Employee Growth Rate The Employee Growth Rate is a critical HR metric that helps assess this capability. By monitoring the development and promotion rate of employees within an organization, this metric highlights the effectiveness of training and development programs while signaling a truly forward-thinking learning organization. An organization’s deliberate focus on Employee Growth Rate is the embodiment of its commitment to competency-based learning. By tracking advancements, skill enhancements, and career progressions, this metric stresses the importance of investing in people. At the same time, it also serves as a valuable input for decision-makers looking to improve existing development programs, create new opportunities for growth, and better align workforce skills with strategic business goals. Employee Growth Rate, when viewed as a part of the bigger picture, is transformative. It elevates human capital, enhances employee engagement, and promotes exceptional performance. As a direct result, this results in increased levels of job satisfaction and employee retention. When it comes to a business performance perspective, an environment that nurtures talent and encourages growth leads to a more agile, effective, and adaptive workforce, enabling an organization to thrive in an ever-changing market. The Employee Growth Rate serves as an insightful measure of an organization’s dedication to cultivating a learning organization. Paying close attention to this metric and taking data-driven, empathetic actions reflects an organization’s commitment to its people, ultimately ensuring that it stays on a path of continuous growth. Embracing the Employee Growth Rate is a testament to an organization’s focus on competency-based learning, its appreciation for individual aspirations, and its unwavering pursuit of sustained business performance. Retention Rates In a world where employees are the linchpin of business success, Retention Rates serve as a crucial HR metric. This metric quantifies how well a company retains its employees over a period, effectively revealing insights into job satisfaction levels and the overall company culture. Keeping a keen eye on Retention Rates is central to the sustained effectiveness of a learning organization. Retention Rates are more than just numbers. They are indicative of an organization’s ability to maintain a competent, motivated workforce. High retention rates usually point towards positive job satisfaction and a supportive company culture. On the contrary, low retention rates may signal potential challenges that need to be addressed. These could include aspects related to competency-based learning, compensation, employee engagement, or opportunities for growth and development. Studying Retention Rates enables HR professionals and business leaders to identify areas of improvement within the organization. These insights guide decision-making processes around recruitment, onboarding, training, rewards, and recognition systems. An organization that thrives on high retention rates is likely to have a team of committed employees on board, willing to contribute to improved business performance. Such an organization tends to exude a positive ambiance, advantageous for its reputation as an employer, and its customer relationships. In a nutshell, Retention Rates are a vital health check of an organization. They portray how effectively an organization cultivates a climate of employee satisfaction and continuous growth, in line with principles of a learning organization. By focusing on Retention Rates, businesses can significantly influence competency-based learning, drive enhanced employee job satisfaction, and sculpt an empowering company culture, all of which are essentials for elevated business performance. Employee Performance Metrics At the heart of a successful business are its employees and their performance. Employee Performance Metrics offer a systematic lens to evaluate individual productivity and effectiveness. By providing a measure of an employee’s contributions and accomplishments, these metrics serve as an essential tool to comprehend and enhance workforce capabilities, a critical aspect of any learning organization. The scope of Employee Performance Metrics is broad and multifaceted, capturing a spectrum of data points such as quality and quantity of work, adherence to deadlines, job knowledge, and innovation. By providing clear and accurate information of individual employee contributions, these metrics aid HR professionals and business leaders in decision-making processes. They shed light on areas for improvement, identify potentials for promotion, and inform strategies for competency-based learning initiatives. The power of these metrics extends beyond individual employees and has the capacity to transform the entire organization. A workforce that is regularly assessed and guided using performance metrics is more likely to be engaged, motivated, and productive. This engagement and productivity directly impact the operational efficiency of the organization, contributing to enhanced business performance. Employee Performance Metrics provide valuable insights into an organization’s most valuable asset, its people. By focusing on these metrics, organizations can create a proactive workforce, inspire continued learning, and drive performance growth, making them an indispensable feature of a well-functioning learning organization. They are the lynchpin that ties individual performance to competency-based learning and business performance, creating a synergetic environment that benefits employees and organizations alike. Summary Summary For HR leaders and organizational leaders, understanding a variety of key HR metrics is nothing short of essential. By successfully interpreting and actioning the insights from these 19 HR metrics, decision-makers equip themselves with the knowledge to effectively manage and enhance multiple areas of their human resource initiatives. These metrics not only help in shaping a productive and content workforce but also contribute tangibly to an organization’s future success. Diving deep into employee satisfaction, organizations must adopt a systematic approach to gauge the happiness and well-being of their workforce. By accurately capturing the significance of various factors that influence satisfaction, HR metrics enable organizational leaders to make informed decisions, fostering an uplifting workplace atmosphere where employees feel acknowledged, motivated, and valued. Retention rates, on the other hand, hold a mirror to the overall company culture, illuminating aspects that may need improvement, or areas that are flourishing. Consequently, these metrics facilitate effective action plans that drive harmonious cultures and stable employee longevity. The connection between a satisfied employee base and an efficient workforce highlights the core importance of retaining human capital for success in any business. In conclusion, comprehending and leveraging these key HR metrics is an indispensable requirement for building a robust and thriving organization that stands the test of time. HR teams, armed with these insights, play a crucial role in weaving together a genuinely outstanding company tapestry. By nurturing employees through informed, empathetic decisions, organizations can strengthen the foundations of their workforce, ensuring long-lasting success sustained by satisfied, productive, and fulfilled employees.

decision-making
2023年12月10日
decision-making

视频：Leading Through Transformation The Future of HR in the AI Era Leading Through Transformation The Future of HR in the AI Era Jiajia Chen Senior Group Product Manager Nvidia 点击访问：https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=toiy_sBDXHs 以下为演讲稿翻译整理，仅供参考：引领变革：人工智能时代人力资源的未来欢迎大家，我很高兴有机会讨论一个自2022年底以来成为焦点的话题。随着chat的广泛成功，许多人开始思考一个问题：我还会有工作吗？对于一些父母来说，这个问题可能会有所不同：我的孩子将来会有工作吗？在深入这个问题之前，让我简单介绍一下自己。我早期的职业生涯涉及多个商业领域，包括人力资源，后来我专注于人工智能产品管理。我拥有几个学位，包括法律学位、MBA学位、经济学科学学位和软件工程学位。我曾在Nidia管理人工智能基础设施产品组合几年。去年晚些时候，我转移到另一个名为Nidia Omniverse的产品组，这是一个数字孪生平台工业元宇宙。我们的企业客户可以使用Omniverse来创建数字孪生工业元宇宙，通过利用模拟和生成性人工智能以及与大型生态系统合作。通过这些经历，我对人工智能和人力资源有了深刻的理解。在这次演讲中，我希望能提供一个框架，帮助大家思考如何在人工智能时代领导转型，如何保持相关性并比人工智能发展得更快。人工智能并不是一个新概念。让我们快速回顾一下人工智能发展的简史，为今天的对话奠定基础。人工智能领域诞生于1950年代。1950年，艾伦·图灵提出了模仿人类智能的通用机器的概念。1956年，人工智能这一术语被创造出来。在1970年代和1980年代，人工智能最初的乐观预期开始减弱，因为进展没有达到高期望，人工智能研究的资金减少，领域经历了被称为人工智能冬天的时期。在人工智能冬天期间，研究人员专注于发展专家系统，这是基于规则的系统，旨在模仿人类专家在特定领域的知识和决策能力。这种方法在实际应用中取得了一些进展，例如医学诊断和工业自动化。1980年代，人工智能的焦点转向了机器学习和神经网络。机器学习算法允许计算机在没有明确编程的情况下从数据中学习，并做出预测或决策。受人类大脑结构启发的神经网络引起了关注，并被应用于各种任务，包括图像和语音识别。得益于大量数据的可用性和计算能力的进步，人工智能经历了复兴。Nidia的贡献是关键的。 2022年11月推出的ChatGPT标志着人工智能的关键时刻。生成性人工智能正在推动机器创造的边界。人工智能越来越多地融入各种应用和行业，正在金融、医疗保健、网络安全等领域发挥作用，转变行业并创造新的机会。你们中有多少人尝试过ChatGPT？你们喜欢它的哪些功能？是否用它来草拟电子邮件、创建培训材料，或者提出棘手的问题，试图愚弄chat GPT，证明你的人类智能更高级？人工智能预计将在各个维度对工作场所产生重大变化。以下是人工智能可能带来的九个变化。首先，提高生产力：人工智能是否会提高生产力和经济增长？许多人这样预期，但也有很多人告诉你，到目前为止，这种生成性人工智能趋势并没有大幅提高生产力，除了提供一些有趣的玩具。你们中的一些人可能听说过“生产力悖论”，这是1970年代和1980年代在美国发生的现象。我的预测是，人工智能不会发生这种情况。人工智能可以更快地传播，且所需的资本投资更少。这是因为人工智能在短期内的应用主要是软件革命，所需的大部分基础设施，如计算设备、网络和云服务，已经到位。你现在可以通过手机立即使用chat GPT和迅速增长的类似软件。其次，收入不平等：人工智能是否会带来自动化的奢华时代，还是只会加剧现有的不平等？美国国家经济研究局发布的一份报告称，自1980年以来，美国工资变化的50%到70%可以归因于蓝领工人被自动化取代或降级导致的工资下降。人工智能、机器人技术和新的复杂技术导致财富高度集中。直到最近，受过大学教育的白领专业人士基本上没有受到低教育工人的命运。拥有研究生学位的人看到他们的薪水上涨，而低教育工人的薪水显著下降。这一问题将加剧，低技能的白领工人也将受到影响。第三，劳动力技能提升和风险转移：随着某些任务的自动化，人工智能需要专注于提升和重新技能化劳动力。员工需要获得新的技能和知识，以适应不断变化的工作要求，并有效地与人工智能系统协作。有关这一主题的研究很多，不同研究的数据也有所不同。彭博社的研究显示，由于人工智能对工作的影响，全球将有超过1.2亿工人在未来三年内需要重新培训。据信，由于人工智能相关部署，中国将有超过5000万工人需要重新培训。美国将需要重新培训1150万人，以适应劳动力市场的需求。巴西、日本和德国的数百万工人也将需要帮助应对人工智能、机器人技术及相关技术带来的变化。根据麦肯锡的一项研究，由于快速自动化的采用，多达3.75亿工人可能需要转换职业类别。第四，重新定义工作角色：人工智能有潜力重塑工作角色并创造新的角色。一些任务和工作可能会完全自动化，导致某些领域的工作流失。然而，人工智能也为创造涉及管理和协作人工智能系统、分析人工智能生成的内容、开发和维护人工智能技术的新角色创造了机会。例子包括美国政府试图将制造业带回美国。许多人认为，像第二次世界大战后一样，将创造数百万高薪的蓝领工人工作。然而，这最有可能不会发生，因为在美国建造的新工厂几乎不会雇用许多人类工人。一切都将通过机器人或管理系统自动化。第五，增强决策制定：人工智能系统可以分析大量数据，检测模式，并生成支持决策过程的洞察。这可以使员工和管理者获得更准确、更及时的信息，使各种职能（如运营、市场营销、财务、人力资源）的决策更加明智。2019年哈佛商业评论提出了一个概念，称为人工智能驱动的决策，与数据驱动的决策相比，它允许我们克服作为人类处理器的固有局限性，如低效和认知偏见，因为你可以指派机器来处理大量数据，让我们人类应用判断力、文化价值观和情境来选择决策选项。第六，人工智能与人类的协作：人工智能技术使得人与智能系统之间的协作成为可能。这种协作可能涉及利用人工智能在数据分析、模式识别和预测方面的优势，而人类则提供批判性思维、创造力、同理心和复杂问题解决技能。如果能够有效地实现人与人工智能系统的协作，可以带来改进的成果和创新。的确，许多公司已经使用人工智能自动化流程，但到目前为止，证据表明，那些旨在取代员工的部署只会带来短期的生产力提升。在一项涉及1500家公司的基本研究中发现，当人类和机器一起工作时，公司取得了最显著的绩效提升。第七，增强智能：人工智能可以通过补充和增强人类能力来增强人类智能。它可以协助人们执行诸如信息检索、数据分析和问题解决等任务。人工智能支持的虚拟助手和机器人可以为人们提供即时支持和指导，提高他们的效率和效果。第八，伦理考虑：人工智能在工作场所的整合引发了与隐私、安全、公平、透明度和问责制相关的伦理考虑。组织需要建立伦理框架和指南来确保人工智能系统的合理和可信赖的开发和部署。第九，监控和评估AI实施。这个变化涉及到持续监控人工智能在工作场所的影响，并从员工那里收集反馈，以识别改进领域。定期的评估和反馈循环将有助于完善人工智能的实施和使用，确保其在增进工作效率、创新和其他方面的应用是有效和恰当的。（以上为AI补充，仅供参考）目前，我们已经详细讨论了人工智能在工作场所创造的变化，以及人力资源应该如何应对这些变化。现在，让我分享这张早先在一次HR会议上使用的幻灯片。2016年，我在一个名为“HR新模型”的会议上发表了演讲。现在，让我们看看这个模型。一个典型的组织结构包括首席执行官、人力资源业务伙伴、共享服务和一个运营部门，支持管理者和员工群体。公司是否能用这个模型应对人工智能在工作场所带来的变化？我们是否需要一个不同的模型？在回答这个问题之前，让我们看看应对每种类型变化需要发生什么。在这张幻灯片上，我展示了我简单的颜色编码技术。我简单地将所有类型的能力和技能分类并用不同颜色高亮显示。现在我们可以看到几个主要类别和一些零散项目。让我们稍微深入一些颜色分类的挑战。首先，以蓝色突出显示的助理挑战和两个工作场所的变化。HR可以评估利用人工智能的技能和能力要求，为员工提供必要的资源，使他们能够理解和利用人工智能技术，以及如何通过人工智能来增强他们的工作。这包括关于人工智能概念、数据分析、自动化工具和人工智能支持决策的培训。HR可以培养持续学习的文化。其次，以绿色突出显示的变革管理和沟通，在四个不同的工作场所变化中出现。HR可以积极地向员工传达人工智能实施的目的和好处，以提高生产力和效率。HR可以协助经理和员工分析工作并重新设计工作流程，以利用人工智能技术。这涉及识别可以自动化或由人工智能增强的任务和活动，简化工作流程，消除冗余或低价值测试，并确定人类和人工智能如何合作以优化生产力和效率。第三，以热粉色突出显示的职业发展和内部流动性，在三个不同的工作场所变化中出现。HR可以进行技能评估，以确定组织内现有技能，并确定需要解决的AI相关角色的差距。这包括识别与人工智能技术合作所需的技术技能，如机器学习，以及有效沟通、批判性思维和问题解决所必需的软技能。最后，以灰蓝色突出显示的伦理指导和治理，在三个不同的工作场所变化中出现。HR可以与法律、合规团队等相关利益相关者协作，为人工智能变革建立治理框架。那些仍以黑色显示的功能在未来几年将看到更多的自动化和置换，投资较少，因为这些能力在人工智能转型中的相关性较低。为了跟上甚至领导人工智能趋势及其对工作场所的影响，HR可以采取几个积极的步骤。以下是我们可以考虑的一些关键行动：持续学习，HR专业人士可以深入了解人工智能技术、应用和影响；识别人力资源中的人工智能用例，HR可以探索各种可以增强其功能和简化流程的人工智能应用，例如自动化日常行政任务、改进候选人筛选和选拔流程，以及提供个性化的学习和发展机会；评估组织的人工智能准备情况，HR可以评估组织当前的基础设施、技术能力和文化，以确定其采用人工智能的准备情况；通信和透明度，人工智能实施期间的沟通和透明度对于缓解对工作安全的担忧、澄清人工智能采用的好处以及确保员工理解人工智能技术将如何增强而非取代他们的工作至关重要；监控和评估人工智能实施，HR可以持续监控人工智能对工作场所的影响，并从员工那里收集反馈，以识别改进领域。定期的评估和反馈循环将有助于完善人工智能实施。

decision-making
2023年07月02日

订阅NACSHR周报

HR Jobs