Paychex因数据泄露被起诉：数千员工信息遭曝光事件背景
2024年4月30日，知名薪资服务公司Paychex在与加利福尼亚州政府交换未认领财产信息时，意外曝光了大量雇员的个人信息。此次数据泄露事件导致成千上万名雇员的姓名、社会安全号码等敏感信息被未授权的个人获取。事件发生后，引发了广泛关注和担忧。
诉讼详情
2024年7月11日，纽约西区联邦法院收到了一起针对Paychex的集体诉讼。原告娜塔莉·史蒂文森（Natalie Stevenson）声称，Paychex未能采取足够的网络安全措施，导致未授权个人能够访问并窃取员工的个人信息。此次诉讼的核心指控是Paychex在数据安全方面存在严重疏忽，没有及时通知受影响的个人，从而加剧了受害者的潜在风险。
原告指出，Paychex在处理不直接与公司有关系的个人信息时，负有保护这些信息的责任。然而，公司未能实施足够的安全措施来防止数据泄露，违反了对受影响个人的信任。此次事件不仅给受害者带来了身份盗窃的风险，还导致了财务监控费用的增加以及其他相关损失。
受害者影响
据原告律师团队称，数据泄露事件对受影响的员工造成了以下几方面的损害：
身份盗窃风险增加：受影响的员工可能面临身份盗窃的直接威胁，导致个人信息被恶意使用。
财务监控费用增加：受害者不得不投入更多的时间和金钱来监控其财务账户，以防止欺诈活动。
精神损害：由于个人信息泄露，受害者承受了巨大的心理压力和不安。
数据价值损失：个人信息的泄露降低了这些信息的价值，并可能对受害者的未来造成不利影响。
法律责任
此次诉讼由Weitz & Luxenberg PC和Strauss Borrelli PLLC的律师团队代表原告发起。诉讼文件指出，Paychex未能履行其应有的安全义务，导致员工信息遭到泄露。原告要求法院判令Paychex赔偿受害者的实际损失，并采取必要措施，防止未来类似事件的发生。
具体而言，诉讼要求Paychex：
赔偿损失：包括因身份盗窃和财务监控增加的费用。
提供后续支持：为受害者提供信用监控服务和身份恢复支持。
改进安全措施：实施更严格的网络安全措施，防止类似数据泄露事件再次发生。
行业影响
此次事件并非孤立个例，近年来，越来越多的公司因数据泄露事件面临法律诉讼。数据安全已经成为各行业关注的焦点，企业需要不断提升其网络安全水平，以保护客户和员工的个人信息。
近年来，许多知名企业因数据泄露事件被起诉并支付了巨额赔偿。例如，HR供应商UKG因2021年的数据泄露事件而支付了数百万美元的赔偿。此外，餐饮连锁店Panera和新闻媒体Philadelphia Inquirer也因类似事件面临法律诉讼。
结论
此次针对Paychex的集体诉讼提醒企业必须高度重视数据安全。随着个人信息保护法律法规的不断完善，企业在处理和保护客户及员工信息时需更加谨慎。未来，企业应不断投资于网络安全技术和培训，确保信息安全管理体系的完善和有效运作。
对于受影响的员工而言，及时采取防范措施并寻求法律支持是应对数据泄露事件的重要步骤。受害者应密切关注其财务账户，并采取必要的信用监控措施，以减少身份盗窃带来的潜在损失。此次事件的法律进展将对未来类似案件的处理提供重要参考，也将促使企业进一步加强数据保护措施。
Paychex Sued for Negligence After Data Breach Exposes Workers’ Names and Social Security Numbers
Background
On April 30, 2024, Paychex, a leading payroll services provider, experienced a significant data breach while exchanging unclaimed property information with the State of California. This incident exposed the personal information of thousands of employees, including names and Social Security numbers. The breach has raised serious concerns about Paychex’s cybersecurity measures and its ability to protect sensitive data.
Details of the Lawsuit
On July 11, 2024, a class action lawsuit was filed against Paychex in the U.S. District Court for the Western District of New York. The plaintiff, Natalie Stevenson, alleges that Paychex failed to implement adequate cybersecurity measures, which allowed unauthorized individuals to access and steal employees’ personal information. The lawsuit claims that Paychex’s negligence in data security practices and delayed notification to affected individuals have caused significant harm.
The lawsuit highlights several key points:
Negligence in Data Security: Paychex is accused of not having sufficient safeguards to protect personal information, leading to unauthorized access and data theft.
Delayed Notification: The company allegedly failed to promptly inform the affected individuals, exacerbating the potential harm caused by the breach.
Duty of Care: Paychex is argued to have assumed a duty of care to protect the personal information of employees, even if those individuals had no direct relationship with the company.
Impact on Victims
The data breach has had multiple adverse effects on the affected employees:
Increased Risk of Identity Theft: Exposed individuals are at a heightened risk of identity theft and fraud.
Financial Monitoring Costs: Victims have incurred additional expenses and time to monitor their financial accounts for suspicious activity.
Emotional Distress: The breach has caused significant stress and anxiety among those affected.
Loss of Data Value: The exposure has diminished the value of the victims’ personal information, potentially impacting their future security.
Legal Responsibility
The lawsuit seeks to hold Paychex accountable for its alleged failures and aims to secure compensation for the victims. Specifically, the lawsuit demands:
Damages: Compensation for financial losses and emotional distress suffered by the victims.
Support Services: Provision of credit monitoring and identity restoration services to the affected individuals.
Enhanced Security Measures: Implementation of stronger cybersecurity protocols to prevent future breaches.
Broader Industry Impact
This incident is part of a growing trend of data breach lawsuits targeting companies handling sensitive personal information. Similar cases have been filed against various organizations, highlighting the urgent need for robust cybersecurity measures across industries. Notably, HR vendor UKG faced significant legal and financial repercussions following its 2021 data breach, illustrating the widespread consequences of inadequate data protection.
Conclusion
The Paychex data breach lawsuit underscores the critical importance of cybersecurity in protecting personal information. As data breaches become increasingly common, organizations must prioritize the implementation of comprehensive security measures to safeguard sensitive data. This case serves as a reminder to all companies about the legal and ethical responsibilities they bear in managing and protecting personal information.
For the affected employees, it is crucial to take proactive steps in monitoring their financial accounts and seeking legal advice to address potential identity theft and fraud. The outcome of this lawsuit will likely influence future data protection practices and set precedents for handling similar incidents.
Identity Theft
2024年07月22日
Identity Theft
警惕升级：英国招聘诈骗案激增，全球招聘诈骗都不少
英国伦敦警察局的最新数据显示，向行动欺诈部门报告招聘诈骗案件的人数增加了超过八倍，过去一年通过招聘诈骗短信和WhatsApp信息盗取的金额从2万英镑跃升至近100万英镑。然而，伦敦警察局临时指挥官奥利弗·肖表示，这可能只是“冰山一角”，因为此类欺诈行为“极其被低报”。
招聘诈骗涉及犯罪分子以额外工作或收入的承诺吸引受害者，然后骗取他们的银行详情或控制他们的手机来盗取钱款。
18岁的贝拉·贝特顿（Bella Betterton）来自德文郡，她上了招聘诈骗的当，被骗走了3000英镑。诈骗分子首先通过WhatsApp信息和电话与她联系。诈骗分子通过电话进行了一次贝拉以为是真实的面试，面试内容是关于远程工作，包括使用他们的钱购买和评估产品。犯罪分子通过数十条信息和电话与贝拉沟通，直到他们在她的手机上安装了她怀疑是恶意软件的东西，从而进行了四笔大额的信用卡支付，支付给了一个不明的加密货币交易所。诈骗分子可能会要求支付少量的预付款，他们声称这些款项将在受害者的第一份工资中报销，用于支付正当的费用——如DBS检查、安全检查和小型设备。
金斯顿大学的犯罪学家、也是欺诈者使用的语言和短语专家的伊丽莎白·卡特博士说，招聘诈骗是一种高数量、多阶段的犯罪。“这些短信只会对一部分人有意义……但这是一个数量游戏。犯罪分子只需要少数人回应，受害者就会自行筛选。
“欺诈者会让受害者经历几个阶段，这些阶段是你通常会期望一个人力资源部门会问的——姓名、地址、出生日期、银行详情。
“所有这些信息本身就是有价值的数据，所以即使这个案件没有变成欺诈，这些数据也是有价值的，可以在暗网上出售。”
许多人员招聘公司已经加入了Jobsaware计划，这是执法机关和英国政府为应对这一问题而成立的特别工作组的一部分。该计划是在大流行期间招聘诈骗案件增加后推出的。到目前为止，近500家英国招聘公司向其候选人推广JobsAware，每天有超过50万个在线职位广告展示JobsAware的标志。
The rise in recruitment scams in the UK, as reported by the City of London Police, is a concerning trend that highlights the evolving nature of online fraud. The statistics indicate a significant increase in these scams, with an eightfold rise in reports to Action Fraud and the amount of money stolen jumping from £20,000 to nearly £1 million in just one year. This dramatic escalation underscores the seriousness and growing sophistication of these scams.
Recruitment scams typically involve criminals offering fake job opportunities to lure individuals. They use the promise of work or extra income to deceive victims into providing bank details or gaining access to their phones, often leading to substantial financial losses. The case of 18-year-old Bella Betterton from Devon is a poignant example. She was deceived through WhatsApp messages and phone calls, believing she was participating in a legitimate job interview. The scammers groomed her with consistent communication before presumably installing malware on her phone, which resulted in significant financial loss.
The complexity of these scams is highlighted by Dr. Elisabeth Carter, a criminologist at Kingston University. She points out that recruitment scams are high-volume, multi-stage crimes, employing specific language and tactics to manipulate victims. By mimicking the processes of legitimate HR departments, fraudsters collect valuable personal data, which can be used for further fraud or sold on the dark web.
The response to this growing threat includes initiatives like the Jobsaware scheme, a collaboration between law enforcement, the UK government, and staffing firms. This program aims to combat recruitment scams, especially following their increase during the pandemic. Nearly 500 UK recruiters are participating in promoting JobsAware to their candidates, and more than half a million online job adverts display the JobsAware logo daily, demonstrating the scale of efforts to raise awareness and protect job seekers.
This situation serves as a stark reminder of the need for vigilance in the digital age, especially when seeking employment opportunities online. Individuals must be cautious and verify the legitimacy of job offers and recruiters. Additionally, this highlights the importance of ongoing efforts by authorities, organizations, and the public in combating such fraudulent activities.
扫一扫
添加客服
