• 资讯
    Sterling Acquires Vault Workforce Screening: Offering Market Leading Clinical Solutions Sterling, a talent optimization platform has recently acquired Vault Workforce Screening, renowned for building reliable screening solutions for employers. The acquisition strengthens the capabilities of Sterling to offer more clinical solutions that healthcare organizations need. Extensive Clinical Network and Flexible Service Model to Meet Hiring Demands in Healthcare and Other Regulated Industries INDEPENDENCE, OH, Jan. 2, 2024 Sterling Check Corp. (NASDAQ: STER) (“Sterling”), a leading global provider of background screening and identity services, today announced that it has acquired Vault Workforce Screening (“Vault”), a leading U.S. clinic management platform. The acquisition brings a network of 17,000 clinics and a flexible service model to enhance Sterling’s existing drug and health services. This will enable Sterling to deliver additional market leading screening solutions for employers in healthcare, transportation, and other regulated industries where staffing challenges are most acute, decreasing time-to-hire and improving employee retention. As part of Sterling’s strategy to in-source key components of its supply chain, the acquisition of Vault will accelerate and strengthen Sterling’s financial model and revenue growth. Vault’s proprietary service model, including Medical Review Officer (MRO) services and emergency/after-hours scheduling, will bring increased flexibility and control over delivery of drug and clinical services. This will enhance Sterling’s suite of pre- and post-employment drug and health solutions, benefiting both Sterling and Vault clients. “The acquisition of Vault extends Sterling’s drug and health testing capabilities with a broader range of clinical options, delivery channels, and service models,” says Josh Peirez, Chief Executive Officer of Sterling. “This acquisition builds scale within the attractive healthcare and industrials verticals, enabling Sterling to better meet hiring demands and drive growth, consistent with our long-term strategy to expand through organic revenue growth and strategic M&A. We are also particularly pleased to acquire a strategic asset at an acquisition multiple in line with our typical tuck-in M&A range.” The acquisition is expected to contribute $40 to 50 million of annualized revenue to Sterling and be accretive to Sterling’s Adjusted EPS in 2024. Sterling expects to realize significant financial synergies related to vendor consolidation and pricing optimization, enhanced fulfillment capabilities, and operational efficiencies. “This sale allows Vault and Sterling to combine the very best service and delivery of occupational health tests and exams with the broadest possible menu of employment screening products,” said Claire Cochrane, Vault Health, Inc. Co-founder. “Sterling is a great fit for Vault as the business continues its rapid growth, offering Vault’s clients the most comprehensive background and identity products and expanding Vault’s service area to address an expanding global marketplace.” Vault’s expert management team and employees will transition to Sterling as the integration process moves forward and build upon the company’s proven model of providing deep market expertise and unrivaled client service. About Sterling: Sterling (NASDAQ: STER) is a leading global provider of background and identity services, helping over 50,000 clients create people-first cultures built on a foundation of trust and safety. Sterling’s tech-enabled services help organizations across all industries and regions establish great environments for their workers, partners, and customers. With operations in North America, Europe, the Middle East, Asia Pacific, and Latin America, Sterling conducted more than 110 million searches in the twelve months ending December 31, 2022. Visit us at www.sterlingcheck.com. SOURCE Sterling
    资讯
    2024年01月05日
  • 资讯
    Josh Bersin:2024: The Year That Changes Business Forever (Podcast) The podcast "2024: The Year That Changes Business Forever" by Josh Bersin explores anticipated transformations in business by 2024. It highlights the impact of AI, labor shortages, and evolving organizational structures. The podcast delves into the 2023 economic performance, changes in employee engagement, and the necessity for businesses to adapt strategically. It emphasizes a shift towards dynamic, flatter organizations and the critical role of systemic HR practices in shaping future business landscapes. Josh Bersin探讨了2024年企业预期的转型。这些转型由AI的应用、劳动力短缺和组织结构的变化驱动。播客讨论了2023年的经济表现、员工参与度的变化以及企业为应对未来挑战所需的适应策略。它强调了向动态、扁平化组织的转变和系统性人力资源实践在塑造未来商业环境中的重要作用。 In this podcast I recap 2023 and discuss the big stories for 2024, and to me this year is a tipping point that changes business forever. Why do I say this? Because we’re entering a world of labor shortages, redesign of our companies, and business transformation driven by AI. We’ll look back on 2024 and realize it was a very pivotal year. (Note: In mid-January we’re going to be publishing our detailed predictions report. This article is an edited transcript of this week’s podcast, so it reads like a conversation.) Podcast Begins: Interestingly, the entire year 2023 people were worried about a recession and it didn’t happen. In fact, economically and financially, we had a very strong year. Inflation in the United States and around the world went down. We did have to suffer rising interest rates, and that was a shock, but it was long overdue. I really think the problem we experienced is we had low interest rates for far too long, encouraging speculative investment. Now that the economy is more rational, consumer demand is high, the business environment is solid, and the stock market is performing well. The Nasdaq is almost at an all time high, the seven super stocks did extremely well: the big tech companies, the big retailers, the oil companies, many of the consumer luxury goods companies did extremely well. And the only companies that didn’t do well were the companies that couldn’t make it through the transformation that’s going on. On the cultural front we had the Supreme Court overturning affirmative action in education, which led to a political backlash on diversity and inclusion. The woke mind virus by Elon Musk and similar discussions further pushed back DEI programs, which has made chief diversity officers life difficult. We’re living through two wars, which have been very significant for many companies. I know a lot of you have closed down operations in Russia, and anybody doing business in Israel is having a tough time. And we’ve had this continuous period where every piece of data about employee engagement shows that employees are burned out, tired, stressed. They feel that they’re overworked. Despite this employee sentiment, wages went up by over 5% and people who changed jobs saw raise wages of 8% or more. The unemployment rate is very low so there are a lot of jobs. You could ask yourself, why are people stressed? I think it’s a continued overhang of the pandemic: the remote work challenges, the complexities and inconsistencies in hybrid work. And something else: the younger part of the workforce, those who are going to be living a lot longer than people who are baby boomers, are basically saying I don’t really want to kill myself just to get ahead. I want to have a life. I want to quietly quit. If my company don’t take care of me, I’m going to work my wage, meaning I’m going to work as hard as I’m paid, no more than that. And that mentality has created an environment for the four-day work week, which I think is coming quicker than you realize. And unions, which are politically in favor, are rising at an all time increase in about 25, 30 years. Inflation and the need to raise wages to attract talent leads to pay equity problems. This domain is more complex than you think. You can read about it in our research and in 2024 it belongs on your list. 2024 will also see enormous demand for career reinvention, career development, growth programs, coaching, mentorship, allyship and support amongst the younger part of the workforce. And that means that if you’re in retail, healthcare, hospitality, or one of the other industries that hires younger people you have to accommodate this tremendous demand for benefits. These are things that became very clear in 2023. But let’s talk about the elephant in the room:  the biggest thing that happened in 2023 was AI. AI has transformed the conversations we have about everything from media to publishing to HR technology to recruiting to employee development to employee experience. As you probably know, I’m very high on AI. I think it’s going to have a huge transformational effect on our companies, our jobs, our careers, and our personal lives. AI will improve our health, our ability to learn, the way we consume news (note that the NYT just sued OpenAI and Microsoft for copyright infringement). Almost every part of our life will be transformed by AI. I know from our conversations that most of you are trying to understand it and see where it fits. And many of you have been told by your CEO, “we need an AI strategy for the company as well as in HR.” And the AI strategy in HR is one thing, but the bigger topic is the rest of the company. So HR is going to have to be a part of this transformation: the new roles, jobs, rewards, and skills we need. This year I’m very excited that we introduced Galileo™, which about 500 or so of you have been using. We’re going to launch the corporate version for everybody in the corporate membership in February, so corporate members stay tuned (or join). Galileo brings AI to HR in an easy-to-use, safe, and high-value way, so it will help you get your strategy together. It’s basically ready to go. Then later in the year we’ll launch a version to the JBA community and more. AI, despite all the fear-mongering, is already a very positive technology. Where are we going next? Well as the title of this article states, I think this is the year that changes business forever. And I’m not trying to be hyperbolic, I really see a tipping point. Let me give you the story. For about a decade I’ve been writing about the flattening of organizations, breaking down of hierarchies, creating what I used to call the networked organization. And this is now mainstream and we’ve decided to call it the Dynamic Organization. And what we mean by this, as you read about in the Dynamic Organization research or in the Post-Industrial Age study, is that the functional hierarchies of jobs, careers, organizations and companies are being broken down for really good reasons. The reason we have functional hierarchies, job levels and siloed business functions is because they’re patterned after the industrial age when companies made money by selling products and services at scale. The automobile industry, the oil and gas industry, the manufacturing industries, the CPG industries, even the pharmaceutical companies are essentially building things, bringing them to market, launching them, selling them, and distributing them in a linear chain. And that “scalable industrial business model” is how we designed our organizations. So we built large organizations for R&D, large organizations for product management and product design and packaging, large organizations for marketing, large organizations for sales, large organizations for business development and distribution, supply chain, and so on (including Finance and HR). And all these ten or fifteen business functions had their own hierarchies. So you, as an employee, worked your way up those hierarchies. When I graduated from college in 1978 as an engineer, I went into one of those hierarchies. For each employee you were an engineer, a salesperson, a marketing manager, or whatever and you worked your way up the pyramid. And at some point in your career you crossed over and did other things, but that was fairly unusual. That wasn’t really the career path. You worked about 35-40 years in that profession and then you retired. And a lot of companies had another construct: management and labor. Management decided “what to do” and labor “did it.” And all of these designs helped us build most of the HR practices we use today, including hiring, pay, performance management, succession, career management, goal setting, leadership development, and on and on. Today, if you look at how the most valued companies in the world, they don’t operate this way any more. Why? Because it slows them down like molasses. If you have to traverse a functional hierarchy to come up with a new idea it takes months or years to create something new. Today value is created through innovation, time to market, closeness to customers, and unique and high-value offerings. The “hierarchy” wasn’t designed for this at all. Here are a few dogmas to consider. We used to think that all new ideas come out of R&D. That’s crazy. Of course R&D is important, but some of the most innovative companies in the world don’t even have R&D departments, they have product teams. The Research Department at Microsoft didn’t even invent AI, the company had to partner with OpenAI, a company that has less than a thousand employees. Here’s another one to consider. Deloitte consultants used to talk about “innovation at the edge,” otherwise known as “skunk works.” We used to advise clients to “separate the new ideas from the scale business” so they new ideas don’t get crushed or ignored. Well today all the new ideas come from the operating businesses, and we iterate in a real-time way. So there’s another industrial organization structure that just no longer applies. So what we’ve been going through in the dynamic organization, and we’ve studied this in detail, is that we’ve got to design our companies to be flatter. We’ve got to simplify the job titles and descriptions so people can move around. We have to organize people into cross functional teams, we have to motivate and train people to work across the functional  silos. We have to build agile working groups, we have to redo performance management around teams and projects, not around individual goals and cascading goals. We need to build pay equity into the system so you’re paid fairly regardless of where you started. Let’s talk about pay. One of the problems with the hierarchy is you get a raise every year based on your performance appraisal. And after a few years your pay may have been quite a bit different than somebody sitting next to you simply because of your appraisals. But you may not be delivering any more than them. That wasn’t fair. If you came into the company with a background in marketing, you made less money than somebody who came into the company with a background in engineering. But five years later you might be doing the same stuff but making different amounts of money. And then there’s gender bias, age bias, and other non-performance factors. In a “skills meritocracy,” as we call it, pay equity has to get fixed. We’ve got to have developmental careers and talent marketplaces and open job opportunities and mentoring for people. And these people practices are the facilitation of becoming more dynamic. And the problem of not being dynamic is what happened at Salesforce, Meta, and other tech companies last year. Salesforce hired thousands of salespeople during the last upcycle after the pandemic, and then a year later laid most of them off. Meta did the same thing. Google’s probably next. These companies, operating in the industrial mindset, thought that the only way to grow is to hire more salespeople, more engineers, or more marketing folks. But the quantity of people in one of these business functions doesn’t necessarily drive growth and profitability. What matters is how they work together and what they do, not how many of them there are. This old idea that we’re going to grow the company by hiring, hiring, hiring is gone. It doesn’t work anymore. It’s still a part of the growth part of the company, you’re always hiring to replace people, to bring new skills, et cetera, and to bring new perspectives. But in a dynamic organization, a lot of the growth comes from within. People grow too. Even the word growth mindset has become overused. We need to have an organizational growth mindset so that we can grow as an organization. A great example of this is Intel. Intel lost their way in the manufacturing of semiconductors and also in the R&D. Now they’re reinventing themselves internally and their stock is skyrocketing. They didn’t hire some guru to tell them what to do, they know what to do. They just need to get around to doing it. Google has more AI engineers than OpenAI, Anthropic, and all the other little guys put together, but they didn’t execute well. Now they’re executing better. They brought their AI teams together into cross-functional groups and they’re sharing IP from YouTube with other business areas. I bet they stomp many of the others in AI once they get it going. That’s part of being a dynamic organization. You as HR people know better than anybody how dysfunctional it is when there are multiple groups in the company doing competing things and they’re not working together because they don’t know about each other, or they don’t talk to each other. There’s no cross fertilization or they’re protecting their turf. All of these are the things that get in the way of being a dynamic organization. And the reason it’s relevant in the next year is this has taken hold. Things like talent marketplaces and career pathways and skills-based organizations, skills based hiring, skills based pay, skills based careers, skills based development, et cetera…  these are not just HR fads, they’re solutions to this big shift: making companies more dynamic. Despite their value in the past, hierarchical stove-piped companies don’t operate very well anymore. Now this isn’t an A-B switch type of thing. This is an evolution, but it’s taking place very quickly. And the reason we came up with this concept of Systemic HR is we in HR have to do the same thing. The HR function itself operates in silos. We’ve got the recruiting group, the DEI group, the Comp group, the L&D group, the business partners, the group that does compliance, the group that worries about wellbeing. We’ve got somebody over here is doing an EX project, somebody over there is doing a data management project, a people analytics group. Okay. Those are all great functional areas that belong in HR. But if they’re not working together on the problems that the company has, and I mean the big problems, growth, profitability, productivity, M&A, etc., then who cares? Then you’re at level one or level two in systemic HR. We built the Systemic HR initiative around business problems. And that’s how we came up with the new HR operating model (read more details here or view the video overview). I think Systemic HR will be a very big deal for 2024, and there are many reasons. Not only are we living in a labor shortage but there’s another accelerant, and that is AI. For those of you that have used Galileo, and I hope you all get a chance to use it this year, it’s absolutely unbelievable how AI can pull together information, data, text from many sources in the company and make sense of what your company is doing. You know as well as I do, if you’ve worked in sales, if you’ve worked in marketing, if you worked in finance, these are siloed groups. Few companies have a truly integrated data management system for all of their customer data match to their sales, data match to their revenue, data match to their marketing.  Customer data platforms are a idea, but it doesn’t really happen very often, and it takes tens to hundreds of millions of dollars and many, many systems to do that. Well, AI does this almost automatically. So when you pull together a tool like Galileo, and you use our research as part of the corpus, and you add data about employee turnover, for example, in your company, or pay variations, you’ll see the relationship between pay and turnover just by asking a question. You don’t have to go spend months doing an analysis and trying to figure out if the analysis is any good. And that’s happening all over the company in sales and customer service and R&D and marketing – everywhere. So this more integrated, dynamic organization is happening before your eyes. In 2024, this is the context for almost everything we’re going to be working on now. The other context is the labor market, which is going to be very tough. You’ve read about from us and others about how tight the labor market is now. Unemployment in the United States is 3.8%, and it’s not going to get much better. Even if we do have a recession, which is questionable, there aren’t enough people to hire. The fertility rate is low, and even if every company gives employees fertility benefits and they all have babies, it will take twenty years for these people to go to work. So all of the developed countries: US, UK, Canada, Germany, Japan, the Nordics, China, Russia, the fertility rate has been low for a long time. The World Bank sees working population shrinking within ten years in almost every developed economy. Since hiring is going to get harder and we’ll see fewer and fewer working people, companies have to be much more integrated in hiring. And we all have to look the Four R’s: Recruit, Retain, Reskill, Redesign. This puts HR in the middle of a lot of job redesign, career reinvention, and a serious look at developing skills, not hiring skills, and using the tools we have as hr professionals to help the organization improve productivity without just hiring and hiring and hiring. I measure the success of companies by two things. One is their endurance: how well have they fared over ups and downs? The second is their revenue per employee. Companies with low revenues per employee tend to be poorly managed companies relative to their peers. Of course there’s a lot of industry differences. When we went through our GWI industry work: healthcare, consumer goods, pharma, banking, we could see the high performing companies were very efficient on a headcount basis. And we found out these companies are actually implementing Systemic HR practices. The other driver that we’re living in a service economy. Interestingly enough, in the United States, more than 70% of our GDP is now services. So the people you have, the humans in your company, are the product. And if you’re not getting good output per dollar of revenue per human, you’re not running the company very well. And this leads to many management topics. How are we going to build early and mid-level leaders? How can we rethink what employees really need? The topics of employee engagement and employee experience are really 25 to 30 years old. They need a massive update. How are we going to implement AI in L&D and replace a lot of these old systems that everybody kind of hates, but we’re stuck with? What’s going on with the ERP vendors and what role will they play as we replace our HR tech with AI powered systems? How will we implement scalable talent intelligence? In a world of labor shortages talent intelligence becomes even more important, whether you think of it for sourcing and recruiting or an internal mobility or just a strategic planning initiative. How do we all get comfortable with AI? And then there’s this issue of Systemic HR and developing your team, your function, your operating model to be more adaptive and more dynamic. So I look back on 2023 I feel it was one of the most fascinating and fun and enriching years that I’ve had. I am always amazed and impressed and energized by you, by you guys who were out there on the firing lines, dealing with these complex issues and companies with old technologies and all sorts of changes going on and how you’re adapting. I continue to be more impressed and more excited about the HR profession every year. I think a lot of people who aren’t in HR think we do a lot of compliance and administration stuff and we fire people. That is the tiniest part of what we do. 2024 is going to be an important year. You as an HR professional are going to have to learn a lot of things. You’re going to learn about Systemic HR issues, you’re going to learn about AI, and you’re going to learn to be a consultant. There’s no question in my mind that over the next decade or two dynamic organization management is going to become a bigger and bigger issue – how we manage people and companies. And I don’t mean manage like supervise, I mean develop, move, retain, pay, et cetera, culture, all of those things. I leave 2023 very energized about what’s to come with AI. And if you’re afraid of AI, just take a deep breath and relax. It’s not going to bite you. There’s nothing evil here. It’s a data driven system. If you don’t have your data act together, you’re not going to get a lot of good value out of AI. I talked to Donna Morris at Walmart last week; I talked to Nickle LaMoreaux at IBM; and I talked with the senior HR leaders at Microsoft. They’re all seeing huge returns on investment from the early implementations, and seeing hundreds of use cases. We’re going to have a lot of new tools and lots of vendor shakeout. (Check out what SAP is up to and where Workday is going.) Stay tuned for our big Predictions report coming out in mid January. That report is my chance to give you some deep perspectives on where I think things are going, recap things that have happened over the last couple of years, and give you some perspectives for the year ahead. As always we would be more than happy to walk through these things with your team. I hope you have a really nice holiday season and you take a deep breath. The world is never perfect. It’s never been perfect. It wasn’t perfect in the past. It won’t be perfect in the future. But the environment you live in and the environment that you create can be enriching, enjoyable, productive, and healthy, and fun if you decide. And I think we all have the opportunity to make those decisions. It has been a pleasure and an honor for me to serve and work with you this last year, and I’m really looking forward to an amazing 2024 together. –END OF PODCAST– Irresistible: The Seven Secrets of the World’s Most Enduring, Employee-Focused Organizations  
    资讯
    2023年12月30日
  • 资讯
    The best HR & People Analytics articles of December 2023 The December edition of my monthly compendium is an opportunity to reflect on the year that has nearly passed and look forward to what lies ahead. 2023 has proved to be another challenging year full of geopolitical tension, economic uncertainty, and climate inaction. For HR and people analytics professionals, it has been a year dominated by generative AI, skills, and the continuing journey of HR from support function to strategic partner. HR’s elevation to being a strategic partner is the underlying theme of my recently published 12 Opportunities for HR in 2024 article (see FIG 1). If you’d like to contribute suggestions for opportunities 11 and 12, please click here and add your suggestion in the comments. FIG 1: 12 Opportunities for HR in 2024 (Source: David Green) Despite managing to catch Covid on the flight home, I thoroughly enjoyed my recent trip to India, at the end of November, where I spoke at the Indeed FutureWorks event in Bangalore. A huge thank you to Aarti Deoskar, Jessie Paul, Rittik Mondal, Rohan Sylvester, and the Indeed team for inviting me. Looking for a new role in people analytics or HR tech? Before we get to this month’s collection of resources, I’d like to once again highlight the wonderful resource created by Richard Rosenow and the One Model team of open roles in people analytics and HR technology, which now numbers nearly 500 roles. Happy Holidays! I wish all readers who are taking a break over the festive season Happy Holidays, and a prosperous and healthy 2024. Thank you to everyone who has supported Insight222, myHRfuture and the Digital HR Leaders Podcast in 2023. It’s much appreciated. Share the love! Enjoy reading the collection of resources for December and, if you do, please share some data driven HR love with your colleagues and networks. Thanks to the many of you who liked, shared and/or commented on November’s compendium (including those in the Comments below). If you enjoy a weekly dose of curated learning (and the Digital HR Leaders podcast), the Insight222 newsletter: Digital HR Leaders newsletter is published every Tuesday – subscribe here. 2023 HR RETROSPECTIVES AND 2024 PREDICTIONS DAVE ULRICH - The State of HR: Looking Back and Envisioning Forward | McKINSEY - What matters most? Eight CEO priorities for 2024 | CULTURE AMP - 7 trends that will define HR in 2024 | KEN OEHLER - RADICL People Predictions for 2024 | VISIER – The New Rules of HR: 10 Workforce Trends for 2024 | i4CP – 2024 Priorities and Predictions Putting my own 12 Opportunities for HR in 2024 to one side, there are a plethora of other trends and predictions being published. Six resources that I recommend digging deeper into come from Dave Ulrich, McKinsey, Culture Amp, RADICL, Visier Inc. and Institute for Corporate Productivity (i4cp). (1) Dave Ulrich looks back on the main themes in HR in 2023, declares “Now is the time for HR,” and outlines four areas where his firm, The RBL Group, will be conducting think tanks in 2024. (2) Homayoun Hatami and Liz Hilton Segel of McKinsey present eight CEO priorities for 2024 including Learn to love your middle managers. (3) Didier Elzinga and Damon Klotz co-opt contributions from Stacia Sherman Garr, Justin Angsuwat, Dr Kirstin Ferguson AM, and Hung Lee for their thoughtful seven trends that will define HR in 2024 including greater pay transparency, staying human as intelligent tech evolves, and regaining trust. (4) RADICL’s Ken Oehler presents five people predictions for 2024, with my favourite being #4 Attention Shifts to Solving Distributed Team Effectiveness (see FIG 2 for RADICL’s model of distributed team effectiveness: Coordination, Connection and Competence). (5) Visier collect trends from a number of industry luminaries and practitioners including Wendy Evesque, Michael Salva, Melissa Arronte, and Eric Bokelberg, with the lead trend being: The CHRO Leads From the Outside-In. (6) Last but not least, in his Foreword to i4CP’s annual look at priorities and predictions, Kevin Oakes highlights the dominance of AI and provides an illuminating insight on the direct correlation between the adoption of AI and business performance: “AI Innovators are more likely to have higher market performance, increased levels of innovation and productivity, and healthier cultures than those that have been slower to adopt AI.” Now is the time for HR FIG 2: The Collaboration Opportunity for distributed team effectiveness (Source: RADICL) PEOPLE ANALYTICS ROB BRINER - Evidence-based HR and people analytics are the same, right? Afraid not Rob Briner examines the relationship between people analytics and evidence-based HR, explaining each of them, outlining the differences (see FIG 3) and concluding that: “While people analytics is a welcome and necessary development within the HR profession and certainly goes some way to helping HR become more effective, it is not, on its own, enough.” Rob also highlights the three key principles of evidence-based HR: (1) Incorporate multiple sources and types of evidence and information. (2) Adopt a structured and explicit process of gathering and using evidence. (3) Focus on the most trustworthy and relevant evidence. FIG 3: Differences between people analytics and evidence-based HR (Source: Rob Briner) PATRICK COOLEN - Establishing people analytics as a common practice (part II) This article by Patrick Coolen, which follows up Part 1 where he presented his People Analytics FIT model, dovetails nicely with Rob Briner’s article as it focuses on the evidence-based HR services provided by people analytics functions. In the article, Patrick recommends that to establish people analytics as a common practice companies should not only focus on becoming more mature in the evidence-based HR services but in integrating these services too. Patrick provides a roadmap to achieving this (see FIG 4) as well as outlining three reasons for integration: (1) Integration leads to faster and higher-quality delivery. (2) Integration attracts experienced people analytics leaders. (3) Integration supports being a strategic advisor. High impact people analytics practices integrate various evidence-based HR services FIG 4: Road map strategies for people analytics practices (Source: Patrick Coolen) JAAP VELDKAMP AND HELEEN GOET - How to determine your success KPIs in HR This is a great article by Patrick Coolen’s erstwhile colleague and successor as Head of People Analytics at ABN Amro, Jaap Veldkamp. In the article, Jaap – together with Heleen Goet – outline the process followed at ABN Amro for establishing a clear link between each HR service and its impact on business outcomes. It outlines a ‘define your success’ workshop conducted between the people analytics team and HR at the bank to link each service to output and outcomes (see example in FIG 5). The article also outlines two benefits of this approach: (1) It leads to better collaboration between various teams in HR. (2) It magnifies the broader advisory role of people analytics. FIG 5: Source: Jaap Veldkamp and Heleen Goet NAOMI VERGHESE AND DAVID GREEN - The Importance of Ethics in People Analytics for Leading Companies Naomi Verghese and I explore the critical topic of ethics, which is one of the eight characteristics of Leading Companies in People Analytics identified in the recently published Insight222 People Analytics Trends study. In the article, Naomi and I outline three key practices on ethics adopted by Leading Companies in their people analytics work. (1) Strong Ethical Principles - including the development of an Ethics Charter, with an example from Jaap Veldkamp of ABN AMRO. (2) Open Communication – including the ‘Fair Exchange of Value’, with a contribution from Dawn Klinghoffer on the importance of communicating value to employees. (3) Ethics Oversight – including the institution of an ethics and privacy council (see FIG 6). The “Fair Exchange of Value” is a key mantra for people analytics teams. If employees understand how their data will be used and see the benefit, it is far more likely that they will contribute data. FIG 6: Ethics and Privacy council for people analytics (Source: Excellence in People Analytics by Jonathan Ferrar and David Green) TOM REDMAN AND TOM DAVENPORT - The Rise of Connector Roles in Data Science In our research at Insight222, one of the characteristics of Leading Companies is that they invest in three key skills in their people analytics team: consultants, data scientists and behavioural scientists. In their article, Tom Redman and Tom Davenport outline the role of connectors, who bridge the organisational gaps that often thwart success with data science projects, and whose key responsibilities mirror many of those attributed to the people analytics consultant in the Insight222 Operating Model. These include: (1) Framing the problem to be solved. (2) Translating between business and technical people. (3) Communicating requirements, progress, and issues within the team. (4) Keeping track of progress toward the overall goal of deployment and organisational change when nobody else sees the big picture. The article outlines how connectors close the gap, provides guidance on how to manage connectors, and provides examples of what companies are trying in this area. Connectors help senior business leaders understand both the potential and challenges of data science, help data science leaders understand the top problems facing the business, and establish a portfolio of data science projects that aligns with business needs. BEN TEUSCH - An incomplete starter's guide to attrition metrics | SARA TIEW - Thriving Together: A Year on UOB's Culture Transformation Journey | JACKSON ROATCH – Lessons from Sports Analytics | LYDIA WU - HR in 2024: A Practitioner’s View | MATTHEW HAMILTON - How data quality is like a DIY haircut November has seen a number of articles written by current and recent people analytics leaders, which typically act as a spur and inspiration for the field. Five are highlighted here: (1) Ben Teusch, part of Meta’s people analytics team, provides a helpful to attrition metrics (see FIG 7). (2) Sara Tiew provides insights from UOB’s culture transformation journey over the last 12 months. (3) Jackson Roatch draws four lessons from sports analytics that we could look to apply in the “less perfect world” of people analytics. (4) Lydia Wu continues her prolific ‘Oops, did I think that out loud’ series by looking into her crystal ball to see what is in store for HR and people analytics in 2024. (5) The nearly as prolific Matthew Hamilton explains why the maxim of people assuming that the better the data quality, the better the analysis is often not correct. FIG 7: Source: Ben Teusch GENERATIVE AI AND THE FUTURE OF WORK PLACID JOVER - The Future of Work is Flexible In this article, Placid Jover, Chief Talent and Reward Officer, presents three innovations Unilever is making to embrace a move from owning to accessing talent. (1) The Skills Passport (“As companies jostle to build a complete picture of what they need and how to get there, we’re fast learning that the real currency is skills”). (2) The Internal Talent Marketplace (“We have already seen a 40% increase in productivity and a significant reduction in attrition directly linked to Flex Experiences”). (3) The Pixelated Workforce (“Breaking down work into its core elements or “pixels”, then dividing those up between permanent staff and contractors, with the AI recommending teams or individuals for missions based on how they work with others as well as how they perform”). For more from Placid, I recommend listening to this episode of the Digital HR Leaders podcast: How Unilever is Creating New Ways of Working for Its Employees. As companies jostle to build a complete picture of what they need and how to get there, we’re fast learning that the real currency is skills RICHARD FLORIDA, VLADISLAV BOUTENKO, ANTOINE VERTRANO, AND SARA SALOO – Rethinking Corporate Location Strategy: The Rise of the Meta City In their Harvard Business Review article, Richard Florida, Vladislav Boutenko, Antoine Vetrano, and Sara Nasir Saloo outline the structure and logic in where and how businesses locate their offices and compete for talent. Their research identifies the rise of a new type of city, the ‘Meta City,’ which combines elements of physical clustering with digital connectivity (see FIG 8). They argue that this makes location strategy even more important including corporate headquarters, innovation centres, and satellite offices — and more significantly, talent attraction and retention. A must-read for those involved in talent intelligence, hybrid work strategy and strategic workforce planning. FIG 8: Ranking the world’s Meta Cities (Source: Florida et al) PETER JOHN LAMBERT, NICHOLAS BLOOM, STEVEN DAVIS, STEPHEN HANSEN, YABRA MUVDI, RAFFAELLA SADUN, AND BLEDI TASKA - Research: The Growing Inequality of Who Gets to Work from Home Data is increasingly showing that there is a large and growing divide in terms of who gets to work from home. In their Harvard Business Review article, Peter John Lambert, Nick Bloom, Steven J. Davis, Stephen Hansen, Yabra Muvdi, Raffaella Sadun, and Bledi Taska, Ph.D. present research on job postings, which finds that remote work is far more common for higher paid roles, for roles that require more experience, for full-time work, and for roles that require more education. Managers should be aware of this divide, as it has the potential to create toxic dynamics within teams and to sap morale. For more from Nick Bloom, tune in to his conversation with me on the Digital HR Leaders podcast: Unmasking Common Myths Around Remote Work. FIG 9: Work-from-home opportunities are more common for highly-paid jobs (Source: Lambert, Bloom et al) RYAN ROSLANSKY - Talent Management in the Age of AI | GIANNI GIACOMELLI - Learning and Talent Management in the Age of AI | TOMAS CHAMORRO-PREMUZIC - 4 science-backed reasons AI is better at predicting your potential in a job | DAVID L. SHRIER, JULIAN EMANUEL, AND, MARC HARRIS – Is Your Job AI Resilient? | NADA R. SANDERS AND JOHN D. WOOD - The Skills Your Employees Need to Work Effectively with AI A key opportunity for HR in 2024 will be to prepare the organisation and HR for the age of AI. Here are five articles that support this imperative. (1) LinkedIn CEO Ryan Roslansky highlights three big shifts to support success a) redefine jobs as a collection of a skills and tasks, not titles, b) bring skills and workforce learning to the centre of talent management, and c) embrace AI to focus teams on human-to-human collaboration, and shares examples from IBM, Genpact, Unilever as well as LinkedIn. (2) Gianni Giacomelli provides more detail on the Genpact example cited by Ryan in his article explaining how they have connected internal mobility, learning, engagement and collaboration (see FIG 10). (3) The brilliant Dr Tomas Chamorro-Premuzic digs into the science to present four ways that AI is better at predicting potential including how AI can increase fairness and diversity. (4) David Shrier, Julian Emanuel, and Marc Harris outline their research on which jobs will be most affected by AI, including which stand to benefit the most from augmentation by AI (see FIG 11). (5) Nada Sanders and John Wood present findings from their research, which highlights two key areas of investment in skills related to AI: a) effective interpersonal skills, and 2) domain knowledge that can help workers get the most — and make the best decisions — when working with AI tools. FIG 10: Source – Gianni Giacomelli, Genpact FIG 11: AI Proficiency relative to human by cognitive task (Source: Shrier et al) THE EVOLUTION OF HR AND DATA DRIVEN CULTURE MARIE NEICU, JOAN BEETS, FRANK VAN DEN BRINK, BEAU HOES, AND EDIS PAJIC – Humanized Growth and Multistakeholder Value Creation: Perspectives from Chief Human Resources Officers| McKINSEY - How is the CHRO role changing? Two resources exploring perspectives from chief human resource officers and how the role is changing. Firstly, the KennedyFitch team of Maria Neicu, Joan Beets, Frank van den Brink, Beau Hoes, and Edis Pajic share the findings from structured interviews with 30 CHROs including Janine Vos, Katarina Berg, Paulo Pisano (also see episode of the Digital HR Leaders podcast with Paulo below), Mala S., and Loren I. Shuster. The report is framed around the concept of humanised growth, which is defined as: “Humanized Growth addresses the needs of all shareholders, consumers, colleagues, community and the capital Markets.” It explores the role of the people function as a strategic partner, how to harness technology for impact, how to advance diversity, equity and inclusion, and why humanised growth starts with the employee experience. The second article from McKinsey examines the evolution of the HR operating model, how CHROs are putting the ‘human’ back into human resources, how GenAI will affect the HR function, and how CHROs can build the leadership capabilities required for an agile transformation. WORKFORCE PLANNING, ORG DESIGN, AND SKILLS-BASED ORGANISATIONS RICHARD ROSENOW - The SOAPI Framework - A New Lens for Modern Workforce Planning Richard Rosenow is one of the best thinkers in our field and demonstrates it with his paper for One Model introducing his SOAPI framework for workforce planning. As he explains, it is a methodology that offers a structured method to break workforce planning into component parts. Each component represents a pillar, collectively forming the discipline of workforce planning. These are: (1) Strategy, (2) Operations (3) Analytics, (4) Planning, and (5) Intelligence. The paper breaks each of these down, and details what happens if one of these pillars is missing (see FIG 12). FIG 12: Source: Richard Rosenow, One Model SCOTT REIDA - Zero-based workforce planning with ChatGPT in Tableau A brilliant, practical, and open-source guide on zero-based workforce planning with inputs from ChatGPT and outputs in Tableau, which has been created by Scott Reida, a workforce strategist at AWS. Scott defines zero-based workforce planning as “A methodology that can shape how businesses align their human capital with organizational goals and enable a more cost-effective solution that gets closer to having the right people at the right time.” His article provides a step by step guide to creating a dashboard (available here) that utilises outputs from ChatGPT for demand and aligns them with the supply of FTEs, facilitating the understanding of capability gaps. FIG 13: Source: Scott Reida JEFF WILLIAMSON AND DONNCHA CARROLL - How to Start Smart With a Talent Marketplace Despite some of the hype, launching an internal talent marketplace can be a significant challenge for organisations. In this article, Jeffrey Williamson and Donncha Carroll share the journey to implementing a talent marketplace at Booz Allen and the key lessons learned with regards to user adoption and change management. The article outlines four lessons: (1) Bring on the gamification (gamifying learning and offering recognition and rewards to employees who invested in their own development). (2) Data goals must be relevant to individual career goals. (3) Even change management needs to change (see FIG 14). (4) Momentum, motivation, and measurement matter a great deal. FIG 14: Four Culture Challenges to Conquer with a Talent Marketplace (Source: Jeff Williamson and Donncha Carroll) BRIAN FISHER, MELBA GANT, VASILIS HATZOPOULOS, KATIE JENKINS, HEATHER RYAN, AND PETER STEVENSON - 2023/2024 skills snapshot survey report: Skills-powered practices, future pay and effectiveness Mercer’s fourth annual Skills Snapshot Survey has a wealth of insights and guidance that highlight the progress many companies are making to embrace platforms and data to action skills-based strategies. In the paper, the authors (Brian Fisher, Melba Gant, Vasilis Hatzopoulos, Katie Jenkins, ?Heather Ryan , and Peter Stevenson) outline the benefits of skills-based practices (see FIG 15), how to build a skills foundation, how to determine the frequency of skill assessment, how to tackle skills-based rewards programs, and provide five steps to building a skills-based talent strategy: (1) Build the business case. (2) Align the key performance indicators. (3) Design with the end in mind. (4) Prioritise change management. (5) Drive and sustain. Also features contributions from Amy Baxendale and Anshul Sheopuri. FIG 15: The benefits of skills-based practices (Source: Mercer) EMPLOYEE LISTENING, EMPLOYEE EXPERIENCE, AND EMPLOYEE WELLBEING NICK LYNN - Can you have high employee engagement and high turnover? Nick Lynn reveals that nearly 20% of companies have both high employee engagement and high turnover; and then provides a wealth of guidance on what you can do about it if that’s the case for your company. He breaks down employee engagement and although it can be related to retention, why it is different. Nick shares insightful research from the CIPD on the and WTW on the drivers of employee engagement and experience, with the latter providing analysis and guidance on the links between engagement, performance, and retention. The article highlights WTW research by angela paul and Stephen Young, where they segmented 350 companies according to both the level of employee engagement and the level of retention, comparing each to their respective industry average (see FIG 16), and how companies in the top right quadrant (‘Value Drive’) also have a performance advantage, delivering the best profits and growth (also see FIG 16). Finally, Nick outlines a three-step approach for companies in the Value Risk category: Understand — Prioritise — Spark Change. I also recommend subscribing to Nick’s equally insightful EX Leadership Newsletter. FIG 16: Source – WTW INDRANEEL BANERJEE, AVINASH CHANDRA DAS, JATIN PANT, AND SHIKHA SHARMA - Employee experience still matters: Talent retention at GCCs While focused on ways to improve employee retention at Global Capability Centres, the five actions to improve employee experience outlined by Indraneel 'Indy' Banerjee, Avinash Chandra Das, Jatin Pant, and Shikha Sharma in their article for McKinsey could be implemented in other business areas. The five actions are (1) Use personas and journeys to customise EX. (2) Reimagine the role of manager to emphasise coaching and mentorship (see FIG 17). (3) Find new ways to embed culture and values for a hybrid work environment. (4) Redesign the office for collaboration and connection. (5) Rethink the traditional workday. Executives should treat EX as seriously as CX by being more scientific and more tailored in their approach. FIG 17: The roles of manager need to be redesigned to focus more on coaching and mentoring (Source: McKinsey) LEADERSHIP AND CULTURE RAINER STRACK, SUSANNE DYRCHS, AND ALLISON BAILEY - Use Strategic Thinking to Create the Life You Want How can we apply the learnings from corporate strategy projects to our own lives? That’s the unlikely – but ultimately captivating – exam question tackled by BCG’s Rainer Strack, Dr. Susanne Dyrchs, and Allison Bailey in their absorbing Harvard Business Review article. The authors present the seven steps they typically use to conduct a corporate strategy project and show how these can be adapted to an individual (see FIG 18). They then describe each of the seven steps with insights and powerful visualisations, as well as demonstrating how to develop a personal life strategy and summarise it on a single page. File under must-read. FIG 18: From corporate strategy to life strategy (Source: Strack et al) MCKINSEY HEALTH INSTITUTE - Reframing employee health: Moving beyond burnout to holistic health Jacqui Brassey, PhD, MA, MAfN (née Schouten), Brad Herbig, Barbara Jeffery, and Drew Ungerman present the key findings from a recent McKinsey Health Institute study that offers insights into how leaders can help create a workplace that prioritises physical, mental, social, and spiritual health. Three standout findings are (1) Employees who had positive work experiences reported better holistic health, are more innovative at work, and have improved job performance. (2) For employees, good holistic health is most strongly predicted by workplace enablers, while burnout is strongly predicted by workplace demands (see FIG 19). (3) Organisational, team, job, and individual interventions that address demands and enablers can boost employee holistic health. FIG 19: Source: McKinsey Health Institute DIVERSITY, EQUITY, INCLUSION, AND BELONGING McKINSEY - Diversity matters even more: The case for holistic impact The fourth report in a McKinsey series stretching back to 2015, investigating the business case for diversity. The main takeaway is that the 2023 study finds that the business case is the strongest it has been yet with leadership diversity being convincingly associated with business performance, societal impact and employee experience (see FIG 20). The full 52 page report details case studies from the likes of IHG Hotels & Resorts, DHL Group, and Air New Zealand, as well as presenting five levers for change for moving from commitment to action. Kudos to the authors: Dame Vivian Hunt, Sundiatu Dixon-Fyle, Celia Huber, Maria del Mar Martinez, Sara Prince, and Ashley Thomas. FIG 20: The business case for diversity on executive teams and financial outperformance (Source: McKinsey) HR TECH VOICES Much of the innovation in the field continues to be driven by the vendor community, and I’ve picked out a few resources from December that I recommend readers delve into: ERNEST NG - What Matters Now: Embracing the New Era of Disclosures for All HR Technology Stakeholders – Ernest Ng, PhD of HiredScore explains why disclosure is a critical tool to maintain trust and legitimacy across four areas (1) Employer Disclosure with Candidates/Employees. (2) Solution Provider Disclosures to the Buyer. (3) Organisational Disclosures to the Government. (4) Industry Analysts with Consumers – the latter is one, I’d personally like to see more of us talking about as we head into 2024. JAMAL MAZYCK - How Employee Resource Groups help build a culture of belonging - Jamal Evan Mazyck, Ed.D provides insights from Atlassian’s journey in building Employee Resource Groups, and how they engender a sense of belonging: “It’s not enough to recruit talent from underrepresented groups and give them equal access to opportunities; once they’re in the door, these employees need to feel that they belong.” STEVE HUNT - The Skills Management Revolution: one-year, two-year, and three-year predictions – SAP’s Steve Hunt breaks down skills management in his article, which covers what it is, why it’s important, the three ontologies companies are building with skills management solutions (labour market, organisational and employee/candidate/contractor), and a one, two, and three year outlook on how these solutions will reshape the nature of work and organisations. FIG 21: Source – Steve Hunt FRANCISCO MARIN - Reducing Employee Attrition with ONA: A Case Study from a European IT Company - Francisco Marin from Cognitive Talent Solutions presents a case study of a European IT company to showcase how ONA can be used to help predict and mitigate attrition, ultimately leading to a more stable and productive workforce. PHIL ARKCOLL - Developer Experience: The Developer Centric Approach to Productivity - Another great read from Philip Arkcoll of Worklytics. This time Phil outlines how by using active and passive listening with the objective of working to improve the developer experience, organisations can get developer buy in, boost productivity and attract top technical talent. FIG 22: Source – Phil Arkcoll, Worklytics PODCASTS OF THE MONTH In another month of high-quality podcasts, I’ve selected four gems for your aural pleasure: (you can also check out the latest episodes of the Digital HR Leaders Podcast – see ‘From My Desk’ below): JASON AVERBOOK - Generative AI: Revolutionizing the Employee Experience - In this episode of the Mercer | Leapgen AI-volution: Redefining HR podcast, Jason Averbook explores the transformative power of generative AI in shaping the future of employee experience. AARON DE SMET, ANGELIKA REICH, ROBERTA FUSARO, AND LUCIA RAHILLY - Who is productive, and who isn’t? Here’s how to tell - In an episode of The McKinsey Podcast, Aaron De Smet and Angelika Reich talk to hosts Roberta Fusaro and Lucia Rahilly about their latest research on employee productivity. KAYE SLAY, VANDANA BHAGTANI, STACIA GARR, AND DANI JOHNSON - Narrowing Scope & Purpose to Ease the Transition to a Skills-Based Organization – Another great episode of RedThread Research’s Workplace Stories podcast where Vandana Bhagtani and Kaye Slay-Pruitt, UXC share with Stacia Sherman Garr and Dani Johnson how they’ve worked together to develop a strategy for transitioning Hewlett Packard Enterprise to a skills-based organisation. DOUG SHAGAM, COLE NAPPER, AND SCOTT HINES - People Analytics at J&J & Playing Drums – Doug Shagam joins Cole Napper and Scott Hines, PhD on the Directionally Correct podcast to discuss some of the great work the J&J team is doing in people analytics. VIDEO OF THE MONTH AMY EDMONDSON, ADAM GRANT, AND DES DEARLOVE - Decoding failure, debunking feedback, & harnessing learning for success A fascinating conversation with Amy Edmondson and Adam Grant, who have just been recognised as #1 and #2 respectively on the prestigious Thinkers50 list of management thinkers. In the discussion with Des Dearlove, Amy and Adam discuss how to manage (and maximise learning from) failure and how to unlock hidden potential (it’s not about where you start; it's how far you can go). BOOK OF THE MONTH KATE BRAVERY, ILYA BONIC, AND KAI ANDERSON - Work Different: 10 Truths for Winning in the People Age I'm currently reading the recently published book by Kate Bravery, Ilya Bonic, and Kai Anderson, which is based around 10 'truths' that are shaping the world of work. Three of the truths are: (1) Purpose rules and empathy wins. (2) Intelligence is getting amplified. (3) Skills are the real currency of work. Packed with insights, guidance, and examples, the book should be an indispensable resource for executives, managers, board members, human resources professionals, and other business leaders. FROM MY DESK December saw the final four episodes of Series 35 of the Digital HR Leaders podcast, sponsored by our friends at HiBob . Thank you to Louis Gordon . MADELINE LAURANO - How to Buy HR Tech and Use It Effectively – Top industry analyst Madeline Laurano joins me to discuss the key themes on HR Tech in 2023, and what lies ahead in 2024 (see video below). SARAH REYNOLDS - A CMO's Approach to Mastering Pay Transparency – HiBob’s Sarah Reynolds joins me to discuss the intersection of HR and marketing, the business benefits of pay transparency and its importance for DEIB. PAULO PISANO - Booking.com’s 360-Degree View of Employee Experience – In our conversation, Paulo Pisano, Chief People Officer, outlines how Booking leverages data to enhance employee experience, streamline talent management across its international operations, and ensure that its workforce strategies are both effective and adaptable in a constantly changing business environment. HEBBA YOUSSEF - Navigating HR Tech Triumphs & Avoiding Failures – Hebba Youssef, Chief People Officer at Workweek joins me to discuss the common pitfalls of implementing HR technology and strategies for success. THANK YOU Finally, this month I’d like to thank: Abhilash Bodanapu for hosting me for lunch during my trip to Bangalore (see here) – it was wonderful to learn more about the people analytics journey bat Capgemini Raja Sengupta (see here) for such a wonderful discussion on people analytics in Bangalore. It was wonderful to finally meet in person! Geraldine Woloch-Addamine for including me in her list of Four Inspiring Voices on LinkedIn – it is humbling to be included in the same list as Amy, Adam, and Dave Teamflect for including me in their list of 18 HR Influencers to Follow Lanteria HR for including in their list of 10 favourite HR leaders of 2023 Dariush Franczak for including the November edition of the Data Driven HR Monthly in his list of HR resources Thinkers360 for including the Digital HR Leaders podcast in their comprehensive list of 125 Podcasts from Thinkers360 Thought Leaders CollectiveHR for including the Digital HR Leaders podcast with Nick Dalton in one of their Content of the Week collections The prolific Esther Abraas for including the Digital HR Leaders podcast episode with Laura Wright Shubert in her collection of resources on strategic workforce planning ___________________________________________________________________ ABOUT THE AUTHOR David Green ?? is a globally respected author, speaker, conference chair, and executive consultant on people analytics, data-driven HR and the future of work. As Managing Partner and Executive Director at Insight222, he has overall responsibility for the delivery of the Insight222 People Analytics Program, which supports the advancement of people analytics in over 90 global organisations. Prior to co-founding Insight222, David accumulated over 20 years experience in the human resources and people analytics fields, including as Global Director of People Analytics Solutions at IBM. As such, David has extensive experience in helping organisations increase value, impact and focus from the wise and ethical use of people analytics. David also hosts the Digital HR Leaders Podcast and is an instructor for Insight222's myHRfuture Academy. His book, co-authored with Jonathan Ferrar, Excellence in People Analytics: How to use Workforce Data to Create Business Value was published in the summer of 2021.
    资讯
    2023年12月24日
  • 资讯
    Exact Sciences 将支付 90,000 美元以和解 EEOC 年龄歧视诉讼 联邦机构指控分子诊断公司及其招聘人员因年龄而拒绝销售职位申请人 丹佛 - 美国联邦机构今天宣布,总部位于威斯康星州麦迪逊的分子诊断公司 Exact Sciences Corporation 将支付 90,000 美元并提供其他救济,以和解美国平等就业机会委员会 (EEOC) 提起的年龄歧视诉讼。 根据 EEOC 的诉讼,Exact Sciences 的第三方招聘人员拒绝了一名 49 岁的销售职位申请人。招聘人员告诉申请人,他“资历过高”,公司正在“寻找资历更浅、能够……在未来几年留在公司的人”。 平等就业机会委员会声称,这种行为违反了《就业年龄歧视法》(ADEA),该法禁止基于年龄的歧视。平等就业机会委员会首先尝试通过诉前调解程序达成和解,然后向美国科罗拉多州地方法院提起诉讼,名为“平等就业机会委员会诉 Exact Sciences Corporation”,案件编号:1:23-cv-00817。Exact Sciences 否认其违反 ADEA。  根据解决诉讼的同意令,Exact Sciences 将向申请人支付 90,000 美元的金钱赔偿,为招聘经理提供有关年龄歧视的额外培训,并确保未来的任何第三方招聘人员了解 Exact Sciences 的政策,以防止在招聘期间出现年龄歧视。招聘过程。  “ADEA 适用于使用第三方招聘人员筛选求职者的雇主,”平等就业机会委员会丹佛办公室主任艾米·伯克霍尔德 (Amy Burkholder) 说。“招聘人员不能随意歧视年龄,也不能拒绝雇用 40 岁以上的求职者,这些求职者可能正在职业生涯中期进行工作转型,并且往往会带来宝贵的先前工作经验。”  平等就业机会委员会凤凰城地区检察官玛丽·乔·奥尼尔表示:“平等就业机会委员会鼓励所有雇主根据工作资格聘用最优秀的申请人,而不是根据对年长或‘资历过高’工人的文化成见来筛选任何申请人。” 有关年龄歧视的更多信息,请访问https://www.eeoc.gov/age-discrimination。 平等就业机会委员会的菲尼克斯地区办事处管辖亚利桑那州、科罗拉多州、犹他州、怀俄明州和新墨西哥州部分地区。 平等就业机会委员会通过执行禁止就业歧视的联邦法律来增加工作场所的机会。更多信息请访问www.eeoc.gov。订阅我们的电子邮件更新,了解最新的 EEOC 新闻。
    资讯
    2023年12月19日
  • 资讯
    LinkedIn就其401(k)退休计划管理违反《雇员退休收入安全法案》(ERISA)的指控达成了675万美元的和解 LinkedIn就其401(k)退休计划管理违反《雇员退休收入安全法案》(ERISA)的指控达成了675万美元的和解。此案件涉及原告指控LinkedIn在管理其401(k)退休计划时,因管理不善导致计划成本高昂和投资回报率低。尽管LinkedIn未承认任何不当行为,但公司同意支付和解金以解决这些指控。 此和解适用于2014年8月14日至2020年7月1日间LinkedIn 401(k)利润分红计划的参与者、受益人及替代支付人。最终审批听证会预计在2023年11月16日举行。该案件突显了大型企业退休计划管理中的法律风险和责任。 LinkedIn 同意支付 675 万美元,作为集体诉讼和解的一部分,以解决有关其违反《员工退休收入保障法》(ERISA) 的指控ERISA) 对其 401(k) 退休计划管理不善。 该和解协议使在 2014 年 8 月 14 日至 2020 年 7 月 1 日期间参与该计划的 LinkedIn Corp. 401(k) 利润分享计划和信托的参与者、受益人和替代收款人受益。 ERISA 集体诉讼中的原告声称,LinkedIn 对 401(k) 计划管理不善,允许参与者支付不合理的费用,并选择成本高、表现不佳的投资,而不是更可靠的选择。据称,这些行为导致参与者的投资价值损失。 LinkedIn 尚未承认有任何不当行为,但同意支付 675 万美元和解,以解决 ERISA 集体诉讼。 根据 LinkedIn 和解条款,集体成员可以根据其 401(k) 账户信息(例如年终账户余额)获得一定比例的和解资金。  拥有活跃账户的集体成员将收到其应得的和解份额,作为其个人投资账户的存款。前参与者、受益人和替代收款人将以支票或符合税务资格的展期形式收到他们在和解中的份额。 该和解没有排除期限。异议截止日期为 2023 年 10 月 17 日。和解协议的最终批准听证会定于 2023 年 11 月 16 日举行。 当前参与者、受益人和替代收款人无需采取行动即可从 LinkedIn 集体诉讼和解中受益。 前参与者、受益人和替代收款人确实需要采取行动,并且必须在 2023 年 11 月 10 日之前提交索赔,才能收到其和解份额。 谁有资格 2014年8月14日至2020年7月1日期间参与该计划的LinkedIn Corp. 401(k)利润分享计划和信托的参与者、受益人和替代收款人. “在 LinkedIn,我们致力于为员工提供构建他们想要的未来的机会。虽然我们不同意 LinkedIn 前 401(k) 计划的法律问题中提出的主张,但我们认为和解是最好的前进道路,”该公司发言人在一份电子邮件声明中表示。 
    资讯
    2023年12月18日
  • 资讯
    12 Opportunities for HR in 2024: From Support Function to Strategic Partner This decade has been uniquely challenging to business with economic uncertainty, geopolitical tension, and the aftermath of the largest global pandemic for a century. But in the coming years, disruptions are likely to increase in frequency and severity (1). The business environment is increasingly volatile, uncertain, complex, and often ambiguous (2). Coupled with rapid advances in technology, organisations are transforming at an unprecedented pace and frequency – from ‘episodic transformation’ toward ‘continuous transformation’ (3). At the same time, companies are confronted with a series of organisational shifts that have significant implications for structures, processes, and people. These include complex questions around finding the optimal balance between in-person and remote work, building new organisational capabilities in the face of challenging workforce demographics and talent gaps, and focusing on developing a healthy, inclusive, and thriving company culture (4). HR is the CEO's right-hand in enlightened organisations. (Barbara Lavernos , Deputy CEO at L'Oreal (5) HR’s journey from support function to strategic partner has accelerated in recent years. During the pandemic, the CHRO and the HR function became as important to the company as the CFO and the finance function were in the global financial crisis (6). The importance of the CHRO and the function they lead will likely continue as many of the most significant challenges facing organisations (see FIG 1) essentially have people elements at their core. The ability of CHROs to assume new responsibilities, drive transformation for the enterprise, and reinvent and upskill the HR function, and therefore meet these higher expectations, will be critical to organisational success (7, 8). CHROs have the ability to drive a company’s growth and business outcomes by effectively using people strategy, data insights, and technology to the company’s advantage. Chuck Robbins, Chair and CEO at Cisco (9) FIG 1: For over a decade, I’ve published an annual set of predictions or trends that will shape work and HR for the upcoming year. For 2024, I want to frame these instead as ‘opportunities’ rather than ‘predictions’ – mainly because they will likely take more than a single year to play out. They are informed by the research and work we do at Insight222, interviews with guests on the Digital HR Leaders podcast, conversations with senior HR leaders, thinkers, and industry analysts, and market analysis. References are numbered throughout, and a comprehensive list is included at the end of the article. Get involved – what should opportunities #11 and #12 be? Readers may note that the title and accompanying image indicate 12 opportunities, whereas only ten are outlined. That is because – as was the case in the previous three years - I’m keen to crowdsource the final two opportunities from readers. What other opportunities should be included? Please let me know in the comments section below, and I’ll add my favourite two to an updated version in the New Year. THE 2024 OPPORTUNITIES FOR HR The first ten opportunities for HR to accelerate its journey from support function to strategic partner are set out below: 1. Prove the value of a fairer, healthier, and more humane organisation One of HR’s key responsibilities as the steward of people and culture in the organisation (10) is to advocate for a ‘people, first’ approach. With record levels of burnout (11, 12, 13), deepening skills shortages (14), and raised employee expectations about work (15), HR has a pivotal role to play not only in hiring, developing, and retaining great talent, but fashioning the culture and environment to enable talent to perform and thrive. Putting wellbeing at the centre, developing an inclusive and equitable culture, personalising the employee experience, and listening and acting on the employee voice, are just four ways to deliver on this opportunity. Collectively, these initiatives are designed to reinforce the ‘H’ in HR and demonstrate that building a fairer, healthier, and more humane organisation isn’t just the ‘right thing’ to do for the workforce, but that it drives business success too (16). Indeed, research by firms including McKinsey, BCG and PwC (see FIG 2) finds that companies that provide a clear people advantage, who consistently invest in building and developing their human capital and imbue a compelling employee value proposition and experience are more resilient and enjoy better financial performance than their peers (17, 18, 19). FIG 2: 2. Prepare the organisation and HR for the age of AI While the hyperbole about generative AI has deepened HR’s engagement with AI (20, 21), research from Gartner finds that only 22% of HR leaders are highly engaged in enterprise-wide discussions on the topic (22). HR should seek to play a leading role as early studies find that AI doesn’t just boost operational performance and productivity (23) but can be used to build better organisations too (24). Four areas where HR should lobby to get involved – all while reinforcing the ‘H’ in HR - are (i) Aligning the workforce transformation that will be required due to AI in line with company strategy and vision (25). (ii) Leading on the development of responsible AI policies and enablement programs (26). (iii) Prioritising high-impact use cases for deploying AI across HR programs and the employee lifecycle (27, 28, 29, 30, FIG 3). (iv) Reimagining the work of key HR roles including the automation of repetitive tasks and increasing the focus on high-value strategic work (31, 32) (v) Building upskilling programs for leaders, managers, employees, and HR professionals. Research finds that if companies can activate the growth combination of data, technology, and people, they stand to gain a premium of up to 11% on top-line productivity. (33). AI is the defining technology of our time, creating a massive paradigm that will transform the way we work with even greater impact than the introduction of the PC Kathleen Hogan , Chief People Officer at Microsoft (34) FIG 3 3. Redesign workplaces and work for the hybrid era Since the pandemic, 90 percent of companies have embraced a range of hybrid work models (35) with most employees now working remotely over 25% of the time (36, FIG 4). Moreover, eight out of ten CHROs say they have no plans to decrease the amount of remote work in the next 12 months (37). Indeed, Nick Bloom predicts here that in the coming years remote work will experience a ‘swoosh effect’ due to the impact of technology as well as new firms and managers being more open to remote. (38, 39). The debate shouldn’t just be fixated on where people work, it should also provide an opportunity to test traditional assumptions about how work is done and whatwork even is (40). It’s likely that this transition will play out over many years (41), and will require experimentation, data collection and analysis, and iterative learning. This provides the opportunity for chief people officers – and their people analytics teams - to play a leading role in the redesign of work and workplaces for the hybrid era. Research is already being published on topics such as when in-person matters most (42, 43), how teams that are intentional about collaboration are more productive (44), and how to drive innovation through adaptive teaming (45). Hybrid is here to stay, so let’s make hybrid work! FIG 4 4. Shift people analytics from insight to impact As Isabel Naidoo, chief people officer at Wise, articulated at the Insight222 Global Executive Retreat in Colorado in September, 2023: “People Analytics is the fastest route to credibility for the chief people officer.” (46). Certainly, for HR to be a truly strategic business partner, it has to have an impactful people analytics function. Insight222's fourth annual People Analytics Trends study, (47) finds that the discipline continues to grow in importance and influence with 22% of people analytics leaders now reporting to the CHRO (compared to 13% in 2020). The challenge for many companies is to move people analytics from insight to impact (48, 49). Our research identified eight distinct characteristics (see FIG 5) that set Leading Companies apart from their peers and enable them to deliver value on a consistent basis. Chief people officers wanting to shift their people analytics team to an ‘A Team’ (see FIG 6) should focus on understanding their organisation’s most pressing business priorities and then align and prioritise people analytics activities that will support them. A capable and flourishing people analytics team eases the path towards a quantified organisation (50) and an evidence-based HR function (51) Certainly, people analytics is a foundational capability to helping HR progress and realise the opportunities outlined in this article. People Analytics is the fastest route to credibility for the chief people officer Isabel Naidoo, Chief People Officer at Wise (46) FIG 5 FIG 6 5. Partner more effectively with Finance Deploying financial capital and human capital together is the secret to the success of a talent-driven organisation (52). If HR seeks to become a truly strategic partner to the business, then it needs to have an effective partnership with finance not least because of increasing regulation about the disclosure of human capital information (53, 54). Research by Insight222 (55) finds that when it comes to delivering value with people analytics, a strong relationship with finance can make the difference. Of the 65 (out of 271 companies) surveyed who confirmed that they had built a partnership with finance, 99% reported that the people analytics team had delivered measurable outcomes over the last 12 months. In HR, we need to be better at building business cases for investment, and in quantifying the commercial value of what we do – just like other business functions. Building a strong and mutually beneficial partnership with finance – like Alan Susi at S&P Global (56) and Laura Wright Shubert at MetLife (57) have achieved – is a good place to start. 6. Build the skills-based organisation Talent gaps and shortages represent the most pressing challenge that companies face (58), with three-quarters of CEOs being concerned about how the availability of key skills will impact on their growth strategies (59). These talent scarcity challenges will only be exacerbated by shrinking working populations – especially in the G7 economies (60) and rapid advances in technology meaning that 44% of workers’ skills will be disrupted by 2028 (61). This is leading to a shift from the traditional focus on jobs to one on skills (62) and the continued rollout of internal talent marketplaces (63, 64) with one study finding that 90% of companies are moving towards a skills-based approach (65). The effort to do so should not be underestimated with the same study finding that less than 20% are currently adopting skills-based approaches to a significant extent. While it is still early days, benefits cited by companies that have made this shift include (i) Standard Chartered unlocking productivity of $2.1m from a talent marketplace pilot in India (66, 67), (ii) IBM improving diversity through skills-based hiring (68), (iii) Unilever increasing productivity by 40% and significantly reducing attrition through its internal talent marketplace (69), and (iv) J&J democratising career development and mobility for its employees (70). The undoubted potential of skills-based approaches for hiring, learning, internal mobility, compensation, and workforce planning is tantalising, but it also makes it difficult for organisations to know where to start. HR can help by identifying a challenge in a specific business function and/or location, partnering with a senior business stakeholder and piloting a skills-based approach, starting to build a skills taxonomy, and then learning and iterating as you go. As companies jostle to build a complete picture of what they need (for the future of work) and how to get there, we’re fast learning that the real currency is skills Placid Jover, Chief Talent Officer at Unilever (71) FIG 7 7. Make workforce planning strategic The shift to skills, the pace and frequency of transformation, and rapid technological advances have all increased the urgency for organisations to become proficient in strategic workforce planning. It is now a top three challenge for people leaders (see FIG 8, 72). The availability of data-driven insights is altering the landscape with responsibility for SWP increasingly coming under the auspices of the people analytics team – this is the case in 50% of companies, based on 2023 research by Insight222 (73). This is driving the expansion from a pure focus on cost and operational based workforce planning to strategic and skills-based workforce planning (74, 75), which enables organisations to get a clearer view on future talent needs and how to close any gaps (76, 77). Steps for HR leaders to do this well include (i) Linking SWP to the business strategy (78). (ii) Joint ownership of SWP with the business and close collaboration with finance. (iii) Prioritising the most critical workforce segments. (iv) Focusing on skills as well as cost. (v) Combining HR, business, and external data to get a full picture (79). (vi) Measuring the impact of workforce planning activities and linking these to business outcomes. (80, 81) FIG 8 8. Advance diversity, equity, inclusion and belonging The business case for diversity, equity, inclusion and belonging (DEIB) continues to grow stronger. In a recent McKinsey study, leadership diversity is convincingly associated with company performance, societal impact, and employee experience (82, FIG 9). Moreover, research by Insight222 found that in 2023 – for the third successive year - DEIB is the area where people analytics is adding the most business value (83). These timely reminders of the value of DEIB are important in a year where the US Supreme Court ruling on affirmative action led to some companies rolling back on their DEIB initiatives (84, 85). As such, HR leaders have a critical role to play in advancing the DEIB agenda in their organisations, demonstrating that it isn’t just the right thing to do, but that is demanded by employees and leads to better business outcomes. People analytics can help in terms of enabling the organisation to measure outcomes and drive action (86), using advanced analytics to get deeper insights on belonging and inclusion, and supporting organisational moves to be more transparent – including providing data that forms the basis of annual DEIB reports e.g. Microsoft (87). Also, with demographics meaning that 150 million jobs will shift to older workers by the end of the decade (88), HR has an opportunity to ensure that their organisation is able to attract, develop and retain older workers, and enable them to thrive. FIG 9 9. Empower and invest in people managers 75% of HR Leaders say that their managers are overwhelmed by the growth of their job responsibilities (89) while more than 50% of managers report feeling burned out (90). These concerning statistics are not surprising given that the role of the manager is being changed beyond recognition due to digitalisation, hybrid work and agile initiatives (91, 92). The pressure is exacerbated by companies cutting middle management roles in the current macroeconomic climate. Given that studies find that investing in people managers leads to better firm financial performance (93) and is key to realising the opportunities from AI (94), it’s time to better support and empower people managers. One way HR can do this is through democratising people data to help managers to be more productive, support decisions on hiring, promotion and pay, and equip them with insights to be more effective and human leaders. The benefit of successfully democratising people data to managers are vast, with one 2023 study calculating that in a 10,000 person organisation, this could amount to $400 million in cost savings, and almost $200 million in revenue expansion (95, 96). HR leaders can also support people managers through being more thoughtful about spans and layers, reimagining the role of the manager, implementing capability building programs, and prioritising manager experience and wellbeing (97). 10. Prioritise HR upskilling If HR is to become a true strategic partner to the business and realise the opportunities from new operating models (98) then chief people officers need to prioritise efforts to upskill their HR professionals – particularly on topics such as business acumen, technology, and analytics (99). At Insight222, our HR in the Digital Age study identified nine skills for the future HR professional to be more data driven, experience led, and business focused (100, 101). Additionally, our 2023 study, Upskilling the HR Professional: Building Data Literacy as Scale, highlighted the critical role of the chief people officer and their direct reports in role-modelling the use of people data and analytics (102). With another study by Mercer finding that 41% of chief people officers wish they had had greater depth in people analytics prior to assuming their roles, there is clearly significant room for improvement (103). On a more positive note, 55% of companies now say they have a data driven culture in HR, which is up from 42% in 2021. 2024 is the year to improve this further, and from a data literacy perspective, Insight222 research highlights five skills (see FIG 10) that HR professionals need to develop (104). Moreover, the study also highlights that the investment required is between $600-$800 per person for an upskilling program (see example in FIG 11). Now is the time to invest in upskilling HR professionals. FIG 10 FIG 11 References (1) Jens Stefan Baier, Vinciane Beauchene, Julie Bedard, Jean-Michel Caye, Dr. Philipp Kolo, Fang Ruan, Alexander Alonso, PhD SHRM-SCP, Anthony Ariganello, Kai H. Helfritz, Bob Morton, Chartered CCIPD, Lucas van Wees, and Wilson Wong - Creating People Advantage: Set the Right People Priorities for Challenging Times (BCG, 2023) (2) Dr. Patrick Guggenberger, Dana Maor, Michael Park, and Dr. Patrick Simon - The State of Organizations 2023: Ten shifts transforming organizations (McKinsey, 2023) (3) Kathi Enderes and Josh Bersin, The Definitive Guide to Building a Dynamic Organization (LinkedIn, 2023) (4) Guggenberger et al, see reference (2) (5) David Green, The Best HR and People Analytics articles of October 2023 featuring quote from Barbara Lavernos, Deputy CEO at L’Oreal, from UNLEASH World, Paris (LinkedIn, 2023) (6) The coronavirus crisis thrusts corporate HR chiefs into the spotlight (The Economist, 2020) (7) Jonathan Gordin, Shari Chernack, Karen Shellenback, and Yamile Bruzza, Evolving the CHRO role in a rapidly changing world of work (Mercer 2023) (8) Julie Bedard, Katie Lavoie, Renée Laverdière, Allison Bailey, Vinciane Beauchene, and Jens Stefan Baier, How Generative AI will Transform HR (BCG, 2023) (9) Ellyn Shook, Yusuf Tayob, and Laurie Henneborn, MSLIS, The CHRO as a Growth Executive (Accenture, 2023) (10) Diane Gherson, The New Deal of Work (SHRM People+Strategy, Fall edition, 2023) (11) Jacqui Brassey, PhD, MA, MAfN (née Schouten), Erica Hutchins Coe, Martin Dewhurst, Kana Enomoto, Renata Giarola, Brad Herbig, and Barbara Jeffery, Addressing employee burnout: Are you solving the right problem? (McKinsey Health Institute, 2022) (12) Kathleen Hogan, Why Leaders Can’t Ignore the Human Energy Crisis (LinkedIn, 2022) (13) Dawn Klinghoffer and Katie Kirkpatrick-Husk PhD - With Burnout on the Rise, What Can Companies Do About It? (MIT Sloan Management Review, 2023) (14) Mark Whittle and Chief Etheridge - Top 5 HR Trends and Priorities for 2024 (Gartner, 2023) (15) Gherson (see reference 10) (16) Angus Bauer, Human capital management research: how people are our greatest asset (Schroders, Saïd Business School, University of Oxford, and the California Public Employees’ Retirement System, 2023) (17) Anu Madgavkar, Bill Schaninger, Ph.D., Dana Maor, Olivia White, Sven Smit, Hamid H. S., Jonathan Woetzel, Davis Carlin, and Kanmani Chockalingam - Performance through people: Transforming human capital into competitive advantage (McKinsey Global Institute, 2023) (18) Amanda Luther, Romain de Laubier, Saibal Chakraborty, Dylan Bolden, Sylvain Duranton, Tauseef Charanya, and Patrick Forth - The New Blueprint for Corporate Performance (BCG, 2023) (19) Bastiaan Starink and Jan Willem Velthuijsen - What every HR leader needs to show the CFO (PwC, 2023) (20) Bedard et al (see reference 8) (21) Kate Bravery, Jesse Bramall, William Self, Ravin Jesuthasan, CFA, FRSA, Benjamin Hoster, and Christopher Lomas - Chief People Officer’s quick guide to generative artificial intelligence (Mercer, 2023) (22) Whittle and Etheridge (see reference 14) (23) Kathleen Hogan - What Can Copilot’s Earliest Users Teach Us About Generative AI at Work? (Microsoft Work Trends, 2023) (24) Guggenberger et al, (see reference 2) (25) Baier et al (see reference 1) (26) Guru Sethupathy and David Green ?? - How to Ensure AI in HR is Fair, Effective and Explainable (myHRfuture, 2023) (27) Bedard et al (see reference 8) (28) Baier et al (see reference 1) (29)  Whittle and Etheridge (see reference 14) (30) Andrew Marritt and David Green ?? - The Impact of GPT and Generative AI Models on People Analytics (myHRfuture, 2023) (31) Bedard et al (see reference 8) (32) Ravin Jesuthasan, CFA, FRSA, Helen White, Kate Bravery, Jason Averbook, and Todd Lambrugo – Generative AI will transform three key HR roles (Mercer, 2023) (33) Shook et al (see reference 9) (34) Kathleen Hogan - Microsoft’s Chief People Officer shares how AI will impact workers (Fast Company, 2023) (35) Guggenberger et al, (see reference 2) (36) Jose Maria Barrero, Nick Bloom, Shelby Buckman, and Steven J. Davis – SWAA December 2023 Updates (WFH Research, 2023) (37) Ben Wigert, Ph.D, MBA, Jim Harter, and Sangeeta Agrawal - The Future of the Office Has Arrived: It's Hybrid (Gallup, 2023) (38) Nicholas Bloom predicts a working-from-home Nike swoosh (The Economist, 2023) (39) Nick Bloom and David Green ?? – Unmasking Common Myths around Remote Work (Digital HR Leaders Podcast, myHRfuture, 2023) (40) Lynda Gratton – Redesigning How We Work (Harvard Business Review, 2023) (41) Dean Carter - Top 3 insights I’m hearing now from HR leaders (Guild, 2023) (42) Michael Arena - Moments that Matter: 3 Network Advantages of Being Face-to-Face (HR Exchange Network, 2023) (43) Karen Kocher and Dawn Klinghoffer - In the Changing Role of the Office, It’s All about Moments That Matter (Microsoft Work Trends, 2023) (44) Mary Baker , 4 Modes of Collaboration Are Key to Success in Hybrid Work (Gartner, 2021) (45) Michael Arena - Effective Strategies for Intentional Collaboration in the New World of Work (HR Exchange Network, 2023) (46) David Green ?? - Influencing the World of Work: Insights from The Insight222 Global Executive Retreat 2023 (myHRfuture, 2023) (47) Jonathan Ferrar, Naomi Verghese, and Heidi Binder-Matsuo - Investing to Deliver Value: A New Model for People Analytics (Insight222, 2023) (48) Thomas Hedegaard Rasmussen, Mike Ulrich, and Dave Ulrich - Moving People Analytics From Insight to Impact (Sage Journals, 2023) (49) Patrick Coolen, Sjoerd van den Heuvel, PhD, Karina Van De Voorde, and Jaap Paauwe - Understanding the adoption and institutionalization of workforce analytics: A systematic literature review and research agenda (Human Resource Management Review, 2023) (50) Arthur Mazor, Steve Hatfield, Philippe Burger, Simona Spelman, Nicole Scoble-Williams, and Robin Jones - Beyond Productivity: The journey to the quantified organization (Deloitte, 2023) (51) Rob Briner - Aligning HR with the business through the evidence-based HR process (HRD Connect, 2023) (52) Dominic Barton, Dennis Carey, and Ram Charan - An agenda for the talent-first CEO (McKinsey, 2018) (53) Dave Ulrich - Human Capability Improvement and Reporting: How to Make Dramatic Progress (LinkedIn, 2023) (54) Yves Van Durme and David Green ?? - How to Prepare Your HR Data for EU CSRD Reporting (Digital HR Leaders podcast, myHRfuture, 2023) (55) Ferrar et al (see reference 47) (56) Ferrar et al, S&P case study (see reference 47) (57) Jonathan Ferrar and David Green ?? – Excellence in People Analytics, Case study with Laura Wright Shubert of MetLife (Kogan Page, 2021) (58) Baier et al (see reference 1) (59) Navigating the rising tide of uncertainty, PwC 23rd Annual Global CEO Survey (PwC, 2020) (60) James Root, Andrew Schwedel, Mike Haslett, and Nicole Bitler Kuehnle - Better with Age: The Rising Importance of Older Workers (Bain & Company, 2023) (61) Attilio Di Battista, Sam Grayling, Elselot Hasselaar, Till Alexander Leopold, Ricky LI, Mark Rayner and Saadia Zahidi – The Future of Jobs Report 2023 (World Economic Forum, 2023) (62) Josh Bersin - Introducing The Systemic HR™ Initiative (The Josh Bersin Company, 2023) (63) Bo Cowgill, Jonathan Davis, Pablo Montagnes, Patryk Perkowski and Bettina Hammer - How to Design an Internal Talent Marketplace (Harvard Business Review, 2023) (64) Jeff Schwartz, Jeroen Wels, and David Green ?? - Navigating the Talent Marketplace of the Future (Digital HR Leaders podcast, Gloat, myHRfuture, 2023) (65) Susan Cantrell, Michael Griffiths, Robin Jones, and Julie Hiipakka - The skills-based organization: A new operating model for work and the workforce (Deloitte, 2022) (66) Tanuj Kapilashrami - Investing for a resilient and inclusive future of work (LinkedIn, 2022) (67) Tanuj Kapilashrami and David Green ?? - How Standard Chartered is Unlocking the Power of Skills in the Workplace (Digital HR Leaders podcast, myHRfuture, 2023) (68) Jane Thier - Generative AI is the major turning point in skills-first hiring, says former IBM CEO Ginni Rometty: ‘People are afraid of what their jobs are going to look like’ (Yahoo Finance, 2023) (69) Placid Jover – The Future of Work is Flexible (2023) (70) Christina Norris-Watts, Doug Shagam, and David Green ?? - How Johnson & Johnson are Scaling Their Skills-Based Approach to Talent (Digital HR Leaders podcast, myHRfuture, 2023) (71) Jover (see reference 69) (72) Baier et al (see reference 1) (73) Ferrar et al (see reference 47) (74) Alicia Roach – The Evolution of SWP (LinkedIn, 2023) (75) Simmi Mehta, Kevin Moss, and Dhruv Patel - Meet business outcomes by evolving to strategic workforce planning (Deloitte, 2023) (76) Alex Browne and David Green ?? - Nestlé's 4B Methodology to Strategic Workforce Planning (Digital HR Leaders podcast, myHRfuture, 2023) (77) Laura Wright Shubert and David Green ?? - How MetLife Made a Success of their Strategic Workforce Planning (Digital HR Leaders podcast, myHRfuture, 2022) (78) Alicia Roach and Chris Hare - How to Democratise Strategic Workforce Planning (Digital HR Leaders podcast, eQ8, myHRfuture, 2022) (79) Jeroen Van Hautte ? - How unlocking skills lies in capturing business data (TechWolf, 2023) (80) Jonathan Ferrar - How to Build a Workforce Planning Strategy that Delivers Business Value (myHRfuture, 2021) (81) Ian Bailie and Caroline Styr – A New Playbook for Workforce Planning (Insight222, 2021) (82) Dame Vivian Hunt, Sundiatu Dixon-Fyle, Celia Huber, Maria del Mar Martinez, Sara Prince, and Ashley Thomas - Diversity matters even more: The case for holistic impact (McKinsey, 2023) (83) Ferrar et al (see reference 47) (84) Paul Rubenstein - Prioritizing DEI Is the Secret to Future-Proofing Your Business (Entrepreneur, 2023) (85) Lily Zheng - How to Effectively — and Legally — Use Racial Data for DEI (Harvard Business Review, 2023) (86) Lily Zheng - To Make Lasting Progress on DEI, Measure Outcomes (Harvard Business Review, 2023) (87) Lindsay-Rae McIntyre - Microsoft’s 2023 Diversity and Inclusion Report: A decade of transparency, commitment and progress (Microsoft, 2023) (88) Root et al (see reference 60) (89) Whittle and Etheridge (see reference 14) (90) Dawn Klinghoffer and Katie Kirkpatrick-Husk PhD - More Than 50% of Managers Feel Burned Out (Harvard Business Review, 2023) (91) Diane Gherson and Lynda Gratton - Managers Can’t Do It All (Harvard Business Review, 2022) (92) Stacia Sherman Garr and Priyanka Mehrotra - What’s Holding Back Manager Effectiveness, and How to Fix It (MIT Sloan Management Review, 2023) (93) Emily Field, Bryan Hancock, Stephanie Smallets, Ph.D., and Brooke Weddle - Investing in People Managers pays off literally (McKinsey, 2023) (94) Emily Field , Bryan Hancock, Ruth Imose, PhD, and Lareina Yee - Middle managers hold the key to unlock generative AI (McKinsey, 2023) (95) Lexy Martin - Unlocking Manager Effectiveness: The Next Driver of Value (Visier, 2023) (96) Lexy Martin and David Green ?? - How to Democratise Data for People Manager Effectiveness (Digital HR Leaders podcast, myHRfuture, 2023) (97) Bill Schaninger, Ph.D., Bryan Hancock, and Emily Field – Power to the Middle: Why Managers Hold the Key to the Future of Work (Harvard Business Review Press, 2023) (98) Sandra Durth, Neel Gandhi, Asmus Komm, and Florian Pollner – HR’s new operating model (McKinsey, 2022) (99) Dave Ulrich, Joe Grochowski, Norm Smallwood, and Joseph Hanson - What Makes an Effective HR Function? (The RBL Group, 2023) (100) Manpreet Randhawa - 9 Skills HR Professionals Need to Succeed in the Digital Age (myHRfuture, 2023) (101) Caroline Styr and Ian Bailie - HR in the Digital Age (Insight222, 2021) (102) Naomi Verghese and Jonathan Ferrar - Upskilling the HR Profession: Building Data Literacy at Scale (Insight222, 2023) (103) Gordin et al (see reference 7) (104) Verghese and Ferrar (see reference 99) A selection of other 2024 HR predictions and trends There are a plethora of other resources documenting predictions and trends for HR and the future of work in 2024 including: Gartner - Top 5 HR Trends and Priorities for 2024 Visier Inc. - 10 Workforce trends for 2024: The New Rules of HR Mercer – 2024 Global Talent Trends McKinsey - What matters most? Eight CEO priorities for 2024 Ken Oehler – RADICL People Predictions for 2024 Damon Klotz and Didier Elzinga - 7 trends that will define HR in 2024 Dr. Solange Charas and Stela Lupushor - HR and Workforce Trends Predictions for 2024 Dan Schawbel - 10 Predictions for 2024 from a World-of-Work Expert Joelle Emerson - New Data: 2023 DEI Trends & 2024 Opportunities Francesca Di Meglio - 8 HR Trends for 2024 LinkedIn News - 34 Big Ideas that will change our world in 2024 __________________________________________________________________ ABOUT THE AUTHOR David Green ?? is a globally respected author, speaker, conference chair, and executive consultant on people analytics, data-driven HR and the future of work. As Managing Partner and Executive Director at Insight222, he has overall responsibility for the delivery of the Insight222 People Analytics Program, which supports the advancement of people analytics in over 90 global organisations. Prior to co-founding Insight222, David accumulated over 20 years experience in the human resources and people analytics fields, including as Global Director of People Analytics Solutions at IBM. As such, David has extensive experience in helping organisations increase value, impact and focus from the wise and ethical use of people analytics. David also hosts the Digital HR Leaders Podcast and is an instructor for Insight222's myHRfuture Academy. His book, co-authored with Jonathan Ferrar, Excellence in People Analytics: How to use Workforce Data to Create Business Value was published in the summer of 2021.
    资讯
    2023年12月14日
  • 资讯
    New Data from Inspira AI Predicts: Nine out of 10 Office Jobs Gone Forever as a Result of AI 报告显示2045年将有90%的白领工作因AI的发展而永久消失,同时AI不仅会取代现有的工作,它还将占据大部分新创造的岗位。 根据Inspira AI的最新研究报告揭示了一个惊人的预测:到2045年,将有90%的白领工作因AI的发展而永久消失。这不仅仅是一次技术革命,更是对我们传统工作方式的全面挑战。 报告指出,与蓝领一线工作相比,办公室工作的自动化更为简单和经济高效。因此,白领岗位将会受到更广泛的影响。这种变化速度之快,影响之广,远超过我们之前的想象。它预示着社会结构和社会规范将经历迅速而广泛的变化,全球性的重大转型已经在眼前。 Inspira的CEO Izzy Traub强调,目前公众对于人工智能相关的工作流失的讨论,大多数估计过低。事实上,AI不仅会取代现有的工作,它还将占据大部分新创造的岗位。这是一个不容忽视的事实。 面对这样的挑战,作为职场人,我们需要重新思考和规划我们的职业生涯。技能的适应和升级变得至关重要。我们必须对人工智能的发展保持敏感,并积极探索如何在AI时代保持自身的竞争力。 现在是时候行动了。我们需要对未来的工作环境有一个清晰的认识,并思考如何在这个由AI主导的新时代中找到自己的位置。让我们共同面对挑战,拥抱变化,准备好迎接未来。 LOS ANGELES Inspira AI, a company pioneering new AI cognitive frameworks, has today released a paper that maps out shocking job losses in the white-collar sector. The paper predicts that nine out of 10 white collar employees will be out of work by 2045, with no new jobs to replace them. In just over two decades, forecasts suggest the world will experience swift and extensive changes in social structures and societal norms, leading to a significant transformation globally. Inspira CEO, Izzy Traub, commented on the data, “There has been a lot of public chatter about AI-related job losses forecasted in the 40-50% range. These forecasts take into account new jobs that will be created. What is not taken into consideration is that AI will also take most of these new jobs as well. The job displacement predictions are skewed far too low, at least for knowledge work. The scary truth is that AI will result in massive job losses for office workers, far more extensive than people realize.” The newly released paper makes the case that automation of office work will take place far faster and broadly than jobs that require manual labor. The argument is that office work requires only the automation of computer processes, while manual labor requires expensive and hard-to-build robots. Automating office work is easier and less costly, and thus office jobs will be impacted more extensively. Dr. Jo Ann Oravec, a professor at University of Wisconsin, is a contributor to the paper and the author of Good Robot Bad Robot (Springer Nature, 2022). She commented, “predictions about technological futures can never be entirely correct, but Inspira’s efforts are based on solid thinking and will certainly stimulate a new level of insight in business, academics, and public policy. Projections of the impacts of AI are often bold but have little to back them up, unlike Inspira’s pioneering approaches. The world is in for changes of such magnitude that we best prepare ourselves. The work that Inspira is doing is groundbreaking and is sure to have a profound impact on countless lives”. Download the paper: https://papers.ssrn.com/abstract=4663704 About Inspira Inspira AI Corp is an A.I. SaaS company pioneering new cognitive frameworks and conversational agents for workforce optimization.
    资讯
    2023年12月14日
  • 资讯
    【下载】2024年加利福尼亚州就业法律指南 Get Your Free 2024 California Employment Law Guide 2024年加利福尼亚州就业法律指南 广泛概述了 2024 年加利福尼亚州的新就业法律。 它涵盖了就业法的各个方面,如一般就业法、大麻使用权、非竞争协议、与生育相关的丧假、工作场所安全以及特定行业的法律。每个部分都概述了新法律、其生效日期以及建议雇主为遵守这些法规而采取的下一步措施。 该指南是了解不断变化的加利福尼亚州就业法律环境的全面资源,有助于确保遵守新的法规和条例。 欢迎点击下载,来自CEA Get Your Free 2024 California Employment Law Guide While the end of the year is full of excitement with the holidays, this time of year also marks the buzz of Labor Law Update Season, as California employers prepare to comply with dozens of new employment laws. Access California Employers Association’s free 2024 New Laws Guide here, including key highlights for each bill and a to-do list for employers on practical next steps! Major changes this year include: Increased mandatory paid sick leave Brand new reproductive loss bereavement leave Comprehensive workplace violence prevention plan requirements Cannabis-use protections Wage and hour updates Just to name just a few!  click here https://www.nacshr.org/Resources/63027AD3-6469-1065-2077-A1551263B72F.html CEA is here to provide customized support to employers of all sizes with their California compliance needs. source:CEA
    资讯
    2023年12月13日
  • 资讯
    您需要了解的 19 个最重要的人力资源指标 In the complex, ever-evolving realm of human resources, effective decision-making is anchored in data-specific insights. This underlines the significance of HR metrics, which serve as key navigational beacons in the journey of driving business success. These metrics, or key performance indicators (KPI) – do not mix them with Key Result Areas (KRA), transform abstract aspects of HR management into quantifiable data, which can be measured, analyzed, and optimized. In this review, we will navigate through the 19 most crucial HR metrics, offering HR professionals and business leaders a comprehensive understanding of these powerful analytical tools. Table of Contents Key HR Metrics Number of Employees (FTEs) Employee Turnover Rate Voluntary Turnover Rate Employee Net Promoter Score (eNPS) Employee Engagement Employee Satisfaction Employee Experience Employee Value Recruitment Metrics Time to Hire Time to Fill Cost of Hire Compensation and Benefits Metrics Salary Range Penetration Salary Averages Pay Equity Pay Gap Gender Pay Gap Talent Development Metrics Employee Growth Rate Retention Rates Employee Performance Metrics Summary At the helm of these metrics are those concerning workforce management. Metrics such as employee turnover rate, retention rate, and absenteeism rate offer profound insights into the dynamics of the workforce. These HR metrics allow teams to assess workforce stability and employee engagement, and are instrumental in highlighting areas that need remedial action, contributing to enhancing workforce efficiency and fostering a positive organizational culture. Moreover, the spectrum of HR metrics extends to illuminate performance-based aspects, using data points like productivity rate, performance score, and training effectiveness. These metrics are invaluable in tracking skill enhancement, individual and team performances, and the efficacy of training initiatives. By analyzing these HR metrics, HR Managers can optimize talent management strategies, assisting in the creation of a high-performing, competitive workforce. Another significant category involves financial aspects including compensation competitiveness ratio and the cost of hiring. By yielding a clear perspective of the financial implications of HR policies, these metrics enable organizations to ensure their reward structures are market-competitive and recruitment processes are cost-effective. Armed with these HR metrics, management can strike an optimal balance between employee satisfaction and the organization’s financial health. 19 Most Important HR Metrics To encapsulate, the knowledge and understanding of these 19 imperative HR metrics provide a robust framework for strategic decision making in HR management. Each data point, each metric acts like a compass directing towards greater business success. They bravely shine the light on areas of improvement, success, and stagnation. By intelligently utilizing these HR metrics as outlined in the HRM Guide, HR leaders stand poised to significantly augment their human resource initiatives, thereby strengthening the backbone of their organizations. The relationship between HR Metrics and HR Analytics forms a powerful synergy that fuels informed decision-making. While HR Metrics offer quantifiable indicators of HR policies’ efficiency and effectiveness, HR Analytics dives deeper, harnessing these metrics to glean crucial insights and derive data-driven conclusions. This confluence of metrics and analytics is central to enhancing the overall effectiveness of HR management, ensuring that decisions made are grounded in empirical evidence and tailored to the organization’s evolving needs. In essence, the symbiosis between HR Metrics and HR Analytics paves the way for continuous improvement and strategic foresight, standing testament to the commitment of HR teams and organizations in nurturing and safeguarding the success of their people. Key HR Metrics In the sphere of Human Resource Management, informed decision-making is the cornerstone of effective practice. It is this that underscores the quintessential value of Key HR Metrics. These quantitative indicators reflect the efficiency and effectiveness of HR policies and operations, generating valuable insights that guide business strategy. Harnessing these metrics equips HR practitioners with a robust toolkit to measure, analyze, and optimize various aspects of HR processes. Navigating this vast array of metrics, a few distinguish themselves for their impact and universality. Among these are the Employee Net Promoter Score (eNPS), Employee Turnover Rate, and several other vital measures. The eNPS, a definitive metric of employee loyalty and job satisfaction, offers a transparent lens into the internal health of an organization. On the other hand, the Employee Turnover Rate stands as an indicator of organizational stability and workforce retention capacity. Thorough exploration and seamless integration of these key metrics play a pivotal role in honing effective HR strategies. Number of Employees (FTEs) Nestled within the cascade of HR metrics, the ‘Number of Employees’ or ‘Full-Time Equivalent’ (FTE) stands out as a fundamental measure of an organization’s human capital. This metric tracks the total number of full-time employees within the organization, encapsulating the breadth of the workforce at a glance. Understood across industries, FTE refers to the number of full-time employees that could have been employed if the reported number of hours worked by part-time employees had been worked by full-time employees. While seemingly straightforward, the value derived from this key metric extends far beyond a cursory headcount. A clear understanding of the Number of Employees (FTEs) serves as a vital foundation for resource planning and analysis. It aids in assessing the organization’s growth and expansion capacity, mapping the trajectory of workforce development, and determining if current staffing levels are aligned with the business goals. It also provides a clear picture of the scale at which HR policies and procedures operate, reinforcing the significance of understanding this measure within the larger HR Analytics structure. Ultimately, the metric mirrors the size and complexity of an organization’s human resources, guiding critical decisions about recruitment, retention, and resource allocation to align with the organization’s strategic objectives. Employee Turnover Rate Among the essential HR Metrics, the Employee Turnover Rate holds significant weight as a measure of workforce stability. This crucial metric gauges the rate at which employees exit an organization within a specified time frame, reflecting the tempo of attrition. An elevated turnover rate may be a symptom of underlying issues with job satisfaction, company culture, or a disconnect between employee expectations and organizational realities. By monitoring and analyzing this metric, HR specialists and business leaders alike can glean crucial insights into the overall health and attractiveness of their workplace. Understanding the Employee Turnover Rate assists organizations in identifying areas in need of improvement and implementing targeted interventions. A high turnover rate can profoundly impact a company’s bottom line, as the loss of experienced personnel often leads to increased recruitment costs and decreased productivity. Additionally, it may negatively affect the morale of the remaining workforce, as employees witness their peers departing, potentially eroding the organization’s internal cohesion. Conversely, a low Employee Turnover Rate often speaks to a thriving and nurturing work environment where employees are content and well-supported. It signifies that the organization has been successful in fostering a positive company culture, attractive compensation packages, and opportunities for personal and professional growth. Analyzing this metric in tandem with other HR Metrics, such as Employee Retention Rate and Employee satisfaction, can provide a comprehensive and holistic picture of the employee experience within the organization. To sum up, the Employee Turnover Rate is an indispensable tool that allows HR professionals to recognize the strengths and weaknesses of their talent management strategies effectively. Pivoting their initiatives and interventions based on this data, organizations are better equipped to create a more stable, engaged, and high-performing workforce. Recognizing the immense value of this metric and taking proactive steps to address unwanted fluctuations is a testament to an organization’s commitment to its people’s success and well-being. Voluntary Turnover Rate In the sphere of human resource management, deciphering the dynamics of employee attrition is of paramount importance. Here, an essential metric that provides specific insights is the Voluntary Turnover Rate. Distinct from overall turnover, this metric zeroes in on the number of employees who willingly choose to leave the organization. By analyzing this key performance indicator, HR managers and business leaders gain valuable understanding into the effectiveness of their employee retention strategies and overall workplace health. Unveiling the reasons behind voluntary departures empowers organizations to address potential lapses in their offerings and policies. Common drivers of voluntary turnover may include a lack of career advancement opportunities, insufficient compensation, or a misalignment of personal values with the organization’s culture. Identifying such factors through the lens of the Voluntary Turnover Rate enables HR teams to proactively design and implement relevant programs, cultivating a more nurturing, engaging work environment. Moreover, tracking the Voluntary Turnover Rate in combination with other HR metrics, such as Employee Satisfaction and Employee Retention Rate, can provide a comprehensive overview of employee engagement and commitment. By addressing the issues highlighted by these interrelated metrics, organizations ensure that they maintain a content and productive workforce willing to contribute to the company’s long-term vision. The Voluntary Turnover Rate serves as an eye-opening metric for understanding an organization’s employee retention capabilities. Through skillful analysis and thoughtful response, HR departments and business leaders can utilize this metric to sharpen their talent management strategies, sustain a resilient workforce, and ultimately, fortify their organization’s foundation by fostering a committed and satisfied team of professionals. Employee Net Promoter Score (eNPS) In the multifaceted domain of human resources, the Employee Net Promoter Score (eNPS) emerges as a powerful tool to measure employee satisfaction and engagement. This metric gauges the loyalty of employees by posing a simple, yet insightful question: How likely are they to recommend the company as a place to work? Built on the premise of the Net Promoter Score concept used in customer satisfaction, the eNPS distills the essence of employee sentiment into meaningful key data points that reflect their commitment and attachment to the organization. A profound understanding of the Employee Net Promoter Score offers HR professionals and business leaders not merely a numerical score, but valuable insights into the health and vitality of their organizational culture. By monitoring the fluctuations of this pivotal metric, organizations can identify trends, recognize areas of success, and spot aspects of the work environment that might require redress and reinforcement. Furthermore, the analysis of the eNPS in conjunction with related HR metrics provides a holistic perspective on the many elements influencing employee satisfaction. For instance, evaluating eNPS alongside Employee Turnover Rate or Employee Retention Rate can illuminate the intricate relationship between overall satisfaction and workforce stability. By harnessing the power of these interrelated data points, HR teams can tailor their strategies and interventions, ultimately fostering a nurturing environment that engenders employee commitment and loyalty. The Employee Net Promoter Score remains a cornerstone within the portfolio of HR metrics for assessing employee satisfaction and engagement. The wisdom and understanding that arise from the skillful interpretation of eNPS pave the way for optimizing employee experience and cultivating a resilient organization deeply invested in the success of its people. Embracing the opportunity to learn from the eNPS reflects an organization’s commitment to fostering a thriving culture, where employee satisfaction and well-being are at the core of its mission. Employee Engagement Employee Engagement is a vital HR metric that gauges the emotional investment and commitment of employees towards their work and the company. This measurement helps gauge the level of enthusiasm, loyalty, and dedication employees have for their roles within the organization. It directly impacts key performance indicators, such as productivity, turnover, and overall organizational performance. Simply put, employee engagement stems from the deeply human need for fulfillment in one’s work and plays a decisive role in the success of an organization. Delving deeper into Employee Engagement unveils its significance. High engagement levels often translate into a more motivated, resilient workforce that achieves higher productivity levels and fosters a lower turnover rate. Engaged employees are typically more loyal, invest greater effort into their work, and are likely to go the extra mile for the company’s success. Additionally, they form the backbone of a positive workplace culture, contributing to a harmonious, cooperative work environment. However, measuring Employee Engagement can be challenging, as it encompasses various key data points, including job satisfaction, loyalty, pride in their work, and the quality of relationships with co-workers and supervisors. Various tools like surveys and feedback sessions can gather these data points, which, when analyzed together, can provide a composite picture of the organization’s engagement health. In essence, Employee Engagement is an invaluable measurement within the HR metrics spectrum. Its findings shed light on the pulse of the organization, highlighting areas that require optimization to enhance job satisfaction, increase loyalty, and improve overall performance. Prioritizing and nurturing Employee Engagement reflects an organization’s commitment to its most critical resource – its people. It is a testament to the organization’s dedicated pursuit of achieving success by building a highly engaged and motivated workforce. Employee Satisfaction Within the dimensions of Human Resources Management, the metric of Employee Satisfaction stands as a direct barometer of how content employees are. It comprehensively measures their satisfaction levels with aspects like job roles, the work environment, organizational policies, and workflows. This critical metric transcends the mundane statistics, illuminating the subjective experiences and feelings of employees towards their workplace. Central to the robustness of the HR Processes, Employee Satisfaction harbors the potential to significantly influence an organization’s success trajectory. A workforce that is satisfied with their roles, feels valued, and finds alignment with organizational policies tends to exhibit higher productivity, lower turnover rates, and greater levels of engagement. It also underscores the positive aspects of an organization’s culture, reinforcing its attractiveness to prospective talent and bolstering its reputation in the job market. By undertaking regular Employee Satisfaction surveys and making this assessment an integral part of their Human Resources Management, organizations can amass valuable insights. These key data points then serve as a compass to navigate the planning and execution of HR policies, correcting course where needed and thus ensuring an environment that promotes satisfaction. To conclude, Employee Satisfaction (aka Employee Happiness) is not merely a measure of contentment. It is a testament to the effectiveness of the HR processes and the overall health of an organization. Prioritizing this critical metric helps build a workforce that is not just satisfied, but also engaged, productive, and committed to driving the organization’s success. Employee Experience A core metric within the domain of Human Resources Management is the Employee Experience. This term encompasses an employee’s entire journey within an organization, encapsulating every touchpoint from recruitment to exit. It includes their encounters with the organization’s culture, work environment, management philosophy, and HR Operating Rhythm. Essentially, it reflects how an employee perceives their interaction with the organization at large, offering a panoramic view of their professional journey. The depth and breadth of the Employee Experience shed light on critical aspects of the Human Resources Management strategy. It helps identify potential areas for improvement, and, perhaps more importantly, areas that are working well. This measure is not confined to the individual employee’s direct work-related tasks; it extends to cover the overarching environment, company culture, and sentiment within the organization. A positive experience fosters a feeling of inclusion, boosts engagement, improves job satisfaction, and reinforces a sense of loyalty. Accurate measurement of the Employee Experience requires a detailed understanding of the organization’s HR Operating Rhythm. It calls for a systematic, disciplined approach to assess each phase of an employee’s journey, from onboarding and integration to growth and eventually, their exit. Regular feedback sessions, pulse surveys, and open communication channels can serve as tools for capturing the nuances of Employee Experience reliably. The Employee Experience stands as a pillar in the realm of HR metrics. A thorough understanding of this metric empowers Human Resources Management to create a fulfilling, rewarding environment that positively influences every facet of the employees’ professional lives. In prioritizing Employee Experience, an organization reinforces its commitment to its most valuable asset–its people. This is instrumental in building a strong, vibrant, and high-performing workplace where each individual is fully engaged and aligned with the company’s vision and direction. Employee Value In the strategic framework of human resource management, Employee Value emerges as a critical metric. This term encapsulates the aggregate contribution an employee brings to an organization, assessed in light of key facets such as productivity, innovation, and teamwork. Effectively, it quantifies the unique worth of each employee within the organization, detailing their individual impacts on overall company performance. An employee’s value is intrinsically linked to their productivity. Higher employee productivity often directly translates to greater value for the organization. However, this metric extends beyond merely measuring task completion rates or output levels. It also encompasses the innovative capacities of the employee–their potential and demonstrated ability to introduce or improve processes, ideas, or products, thereby contributing to the organization’s evolution and growth. Further, the concept of Employee Value embraces the power of teamwork, recognizing the synergistic effects of cooperative, harmonious office relationships. The quality of interactions and collaborations, the readiness to assist colleagues, and the ability to effectively function within a team all contribute to an individual’s cumulative value to an organization. Understanding these dimensions through the lens of Employee Value illuminates the factors driving both individual and collective successes. The Employee Value stands as a comprehensive measure of an employee’s impact on an organization. It encompasses not only the tangible output in terms of employee productivity but also the softer aspects of innovation capacity and teamwork. A nuanced understanding and application of the Employee Value metric play a pivotal role in empowering HR leaders and business leaders alike, enabling them to enhance talent management strategies, foster a productive workplace, and drive their organization toward unparalleled success. Recruitment Metrics Recruitment Metrics serve as indispensable tools for HR managers and business leaders striving to optimize their talent acquisition process. These essential performance indicators, including time-to-hire, time-to-fill, and cost-of-hire, enable organizations to assess the efficacy, speed, and cost-effectiveness of their recruitment frameworks. By evaluating these key metrics, decision-makers can ensure that their talent acquisition strategies are aligned with the organization’s broader objectives while providing a seamless experience for both candidates and hiring managers. Central to the HR metrics ecosystem, Recruitment Metrics hold the key to detecting areas requiring streamlining, improvement, or an outright transformation in the recruitment journey. A comprehensive understanding of these metrics allows an organization to stay competitive in the job market, attract top talent, and fine-tune their recruitment strategies to bolster their workforce. In this context, time-to-hire, time-to-fill, and cost-of-hire metrics emerge as vital signposts guiding organizations toward the best practices for finding, hiring, and retaining exceptional candidates while striving for operational excellence. Time to Hire In the panorama of HR metrics, Time to Hire emerges as a key measure of efficiency within the recruitment process. It succinctly outlines the duration from when a job is posted to when a candidate accepts the offered role. A shorter Time to Hire often stands as an indicator of a more streamlined and efficient hiring process, reflecting the effectiveness of the recruitment strategies employed by an organization. Assessing Time to Hire provides valuable insights into the speed and efficacy of the recruitment function. A brief duration could signal a well-structured and efficient system capable of quickly attracting, evaluating, and securing suitable candidates. It may also imply a positive working relationship with hiring managers, facilitating swift decision-making and expediting the overall recruitment process. Conversely, a lengthier Time to Hire could indicate possible inefficiencies or bottlenecks that are slowing down the recruitment cycle. These could range from a lengthy decision-making process, difficulties in attracting the right candidates, to perhaps the absence of a robust recruitment platform or system. Understanding and analyzing this metric empowers an organization to undertake necessary revisions or enhancements to the recruitment process. Time to Hire is an essential recruitment metric, offering quantifiable evidence of the strengths and potential weak links within an organization’s recruitment process. Regular monitoring of this metric enables HR hiring specialists to uphold the efficiency and effectiveness of their recruitment practices, ensuring the organization remains competitive in the dynamic talent acquisition landscape. Having an optimized Time to Hire helps harness the full potential of the recruitment process, ensuring timely talent acquisition that aligns with the strategic growth objectives of the organization. Time to Fill At the heart of an organization’s talent acquisition process stands the crucial recruitment metric known as Time to Fill. This metric gauges the amount of time it takes to fill a vacant position, stretching from the moment a job opening is identified to the point when the selected candidate steps into the role. Time to Fill shines light on the efficiency of an organization’s hiring practices, offering valuable insights into potential bottlenecks or areas that may warrant improvement. A shorter Time to Fill typically reflects a well-orchestrated recruitment process, where vacant positions are rapidly filled, minimizing the adverse impacts of extended vacancies on the organization’s operational efficiency. Conversely, a protracted duration can signal complexities within the talent acquisition process that may require streamlining, or a case of substantial applicant volume making candidate selection challenging. Analyzing Time to Fill enables HR managers and business leaders to reveal and address any inefficiencies, reinforcing smoother, more effective hiring practices. Developing an understanding of Time to Fill is fundamental in fostering a more efficient talent acquisition process. Through the identification of friction points, organizations can take targeted measures such as optimizing job descriptions, refining selection criteria, or enhancing the interview process. These tailored strategies contribute to a more agile and proficient recruitment system, resulting in a competitive advantage in the quest for top talent. In summary, the Time to Fill metric serves as a vital indicator of the productivity and effectiveness of an organization’s talent acquisition process. Identifying areas for improvement can bolster overall efficiency, ensuring that businesses are well-positioned to swiftly hire the brilliant minds required to drive the organization to new heights. This metric not only measures the speed of the recruitment process but also signifies the organization’s commitment to selecting the best candidates for the job, thereby contributing to a sustainable, high-performing workforce. Cost of Hire In the realm of effective talent management strategies, understanding the Cost of Hire is of paramount importance. This financial metric delves into the costs associated with filling a vacant position, encompassing both direct and indirect expenses incurred during the talent acquisition process. Direct costs include job advertising fees, agency or recruiter fees, and background check costs. Indirect costs may incorporate time spent on candidate sourcing, interviewing, and onboarding across different organizational departments. A comprehensive overview of Cost of Hire offers indispensable insights to HR team members and business leaders, enabling them to evaluate their organizations’ recruitment efficiency and overall competitiveness. Evaluating the Cost of Hire is crucial in optimizing talent acquisition strategies, which, in turn, can profoundly influence an organization’s long-term success. By monitoring this metric, decision-makers can identify areas where cost savings and process improvements can be realized, minimizing excessive recruitment expenditure without compromising on the quality of hires. A solid grasp of Cost of Hire supports resource allocation and budgeting decisions, ensuring that organizations remain agile and capable of attracting top talent in the increasingly competitive job market. Efficient Cost of Hire management is vital to the sustenance and growth of an organization. By streamlining the talent acquisition process, HR professionals and business leaders can balance cost control with the pursuit of high-quality candidates, ultimately fostering a strong and vibrant workforce. Continued investment into refining recruitment strategies and processes will contribute to reductions in Cost of Hire while also positioning companies as attractive destinations for top talent. Assessing and managing the Cost of Hire is integral to the development and optimization of a company’s talent acquisition process. By examining these costs and identifying areas of potential improvement, organizations can refine their recruitment strategies, strike a balance between cost-efficiency, and quality hires, and solidify their foundation for enduring success. As a critical component of the recruitment metrics toolkit, the Cost of Hire serves as a key investment in the prosperity and future of the organization and its employees. Compensation and Benefits Metrics Amplifying the potency of an organization’s human resources strategy necessitates a comprehensive understanding of Compensation and Benefits Metrics. These crucial benchmarks, encapsulating aspects like pay gaps, salary averages, and more, guide HR managers and business leaders in making informed decisions about their organizations’ compensation structures. With these metrics at their disposal, professionals are better equipped to foster a fair, competitive, and enticing workplace, uplifting both employee satisfaction and organizational performance. Beyond merely representing numbers, Compensation and Benefits Metrics carry significant implications for talent acquisition, retention, and overall employee engagement. Drawing a clear picture of current compensation structures and comparing them to market standards can yield deep insights and illuminate areas for potential improvement. By closing pay gaps, aligning salary averages with industry standards, and delivering competitive benefits packages, organizations can showcase a palpable commitment to their employees’ welfare, ultimately underpinning a rock-solid foundation for sustainable success. Salary Range Penetration At the nexus of effective compensation management is the critical metric known as Salary Range Penetration. This evaluates how closely an employee’s salary matches the market or industry standards, ensuring businesses offer a competitive compensation package. Here, the Total Cost of compensation incorporates the entire salary spectrum—from minimum to maximum—considering various job roles and levels within an organization. The central role of Salary Range Penetration is to measure the employee’s pay position within the organization’s established salary range. This can help determine if the compensation offered aligns with industry benchmarks and remains attractive to both the current workforce and potential hires. By understanding where an employee’s salary stands in relation to these ranges, HR managers and business leaders can make informed decisions about pay increases, promotions, or adjustments needed to remain competitive. An efficient Salary Range Penetration system is vital for HR Compensation and Benefits managers in maintaining equity and transparency in compensation practices. Regular reviews and adjustments inspired by this metric can ensure the workforce feels valued, subsequently fostering higher levels of job satisfaction and commitment. By being mindful of this metric, organizations can shape an equitable pay structure that securely aligns the interest of employees and the strategic objectives of the company. Salary Range Penetration offers in-depth insights that fuel fair and competitive pay structures within organizations. By constantly monitoring and adjusting this measure, organizations can ensure their compensation strategies align with market standards, positively impacting employee satisfaction, and, ultimately, retention. Recognizing and acting upon the nuances of this metric is an investment in your people’s contentment and your organization’s long-term success. Salary Averages In the realm of fair and competitive compensation practices, understanding the concept of Salary Averages stands central. Salary Averages refer to the mean salary within an organization or a specific role. It essentially entails a comprehensive evaluation of the sum of all salaries divided by the total number of employees. This metric enables HR professionals and managers to maintain a balance in their internal pay structure while also considering relevant external costs. The value of Salary Averages is reflected in its ability to influence both internal and external costs tied to employee compensation. Internally, it aids in maintaining equity within the organization, ensuring a balanced distribution of compensation centered around fair market value. Externally, comprehending this metric efficiently allows companies to remain competitive in the market by offering attractive compensation packages that can attract and retain talent. Calculating and monitoring Salary Averages affords organizations a clearer lens through which to view potential disparities or imbalances in their pay structure. By identifying these gaps, companies can take corrective measures to ensure equitable pay among employees, fostering an environment of transparency and fairness. This conscious and conscientious practice not only strengthens employee relations but also encourages a more dedicated and motivated workforce. Salary Averages serve as a critical component of a balanced and competitive compensation practice. The insights derived from it throw light on both internal and external costs associated with employee compensation. This, in turn, equips organizations with the knowledge needed to ensure a fair, transparent, and competitive remuneration system—an instrumental cornerstone to fostering a satisfied and high-performing workforce. Pay Equity Centered at the heart of a constructive, diverse, and inclusive workforce is the core HR metric known as Pay Equity. It ensures that all employees receive fair compensation for their work and contributions, regardless of their gender or other demographic factors. The primary purpose of this metric is to foster a culture of equality, aligning with the principles of diversity and inclusion. Pay Equity helps eliminate unjustifiable disparities in the workforce relating to compensation. It is a reflection of an organization’s commitment towards upholding fairness by assessing and adjusting pay scales based solely on factors such as role, experience, and performance. With Pay Equity, HR leaders and business leaders commit to a critical investment in ensuring that their compensation practices do not discriminate but, instead, respect diversity and promote inclusion. Practicing Pay Equity necessitates regular monitoring and adjustments of pay strategies. It may involve conducting equity audits, examining pay practices, and implementing relevant policies that ensure fair compensation. The process extends beyond just remuneration and reflects the organization’s values, translating to higher employee satisfaction, improved employer branding, and fostering a culture that truly values diversity and inclusion. Pay Equity is not merely a metric; it’s an organizational commitment towards fostering a workplace culture that upholds the principles of equality, diversity, and inclusion. By driving pay practices that ensure equitable compensation, businesses can strengthen their employer brand, enhance employee loyalty, and build a robust foundation of trust and mutual respect. Pay Equity, thus, is less a choice and more a responsibility that organizations must shoulder in their quest for sustainable success. Pay Gap In the landscape of fair and equitable compensation practices, addressing the issue of the Pay Gap is a non-negotiable priority. Broadly speaking, this term refers to variations in pay across not only genders but also across different demographic, racial, and cultural groups. Comprehensive understanding of the concept of Pay Gap ensures that organizations adopt a sincerely fair approach to employees, emphasizing the principle of internal equity in compensation models. The Pay Gap is not merely about discerning salary discrepancies; it provides important insights into deeper systemic issues that might exist within an organization. Adjusting for these gaps is crucial for fostering a sense of fairness among employees and maintaining internal equity. This involves understanding these differences, identifying their origins, and devising systematic interventions to ensure equitable pay across all levels and roles. Efficient management of the Pay Gap necessitates close collaboration with HR managers and business leaders. This involves scrutinizing internal salary data, benchmarking against external markets, and rolling out policies that uphold equitable compensation. The commitment to narrowing and eventually eliminating the Pay Gap is a testament to an organization’s dedication to a fair approach to employees. Addressing the Pay Gap is a critical step towards establishing fairness and equality in compensation across all layers of an organization. Tackling this problem fosters a sense of internal equity, resulting in improved employee morale and productivity. As directly linked to a fair approach to employees, successful management of the Pay Gap is a substantial boon to the overall organizational health and reputation. Gender Pay Gap In the spectrum of fair compensation, addressing the Gender Pay Gap is of paramount importance. This metric underlines the salary disparity between male and female employees performing the same work. The alignment of the Gender Pay Gap to equitable pay scales is key in promoting workplace equality and maintaining internal equity. Firstly, let’s understand what the Gender Pay Gap is. It’s the differential between the average earnings of male and female employees, considering they are in identical roles with similar experience and performance. A noteworthy point is that a “gap” indicates a disparity, not justified by professional factors, signaling that there are elements beyond work performance influencing compensation. Such inequalities can undermine the spirit of fairness, negatively impacting the work environment and an organization’s ethical stature. The inevitability of addressing the Gender Pay Gap signals a commitment towards valuing a fair and balanced compensation strategy. By recognizing and actively responding to these discrepancies, organizations cement their commitment to internal equity. Revisiting pay structures, conducting thorough equity audits, and cultivating an environment of open dialogue about compensation are measures that can help in overcoming these challenges. Analyzing and working to lessen the Gender Pay Gap is more than an HR metric; it is a significant stride towards forging an equitable, inclusive workplace. The conscious examination and rectification of these disparities serve as a testament to an organization’s investment in their people, contributing to enhanced organizational morale and overall productivity. Prioritizing a sphere of pay equality is a critical contributor to achieving internal equity in the workplace. Talent Development Metrics In the evolving landscape of Human Resources, the collection, analysis, and interpretation of HR Metrics form a cornerstone for success. One subset of these vital metrics, particularly significant for both the HR Professional and the holistic growth of an organization, is the realm of Talent Development Metrics. These work to quantitatively measure the efficiency and impact of the organization’s talent development and training programs, fueling strategic decision-making and enhancing overall operational efficiency. Talent Development Metrics offer insight into the effectiveness of the company’s employee development strategies. These metrics range from gauging the reach, relevance, and responsiveness of training programs to measuring resultant employee performance and retention levels. While effectively broadening the scope of traditional employee metrics, these data points serve as a critical tool in assessing employee skill growth, job satisfaction, and, ultimately, boosting business productivity. Employee Growth Rate The Employee Growth Rate is a critical HR metric that helps assess this capability. By monitoring the development and promotion rate of employees within an organization, this metric highlights the effectiveness of training and development programs while signaling a truly forward-thinking learning organization. An organization’s deliberate focus on Employee Growth Rate is the embodiment of its commitment to competency-based learning. By tracking advancements, skill enhancements, and career progressions, this metric stresses the importance of investing in people. At the same time, it also serves as a valuable input for decision-makers looking to improve existing development programs, create new opportunities for growth, and better align workforce skills with strategic business goals. Employee Growth Rate, when viewed as a part of the bigger picture, is transformative. It elevates human capital, enhances employee engagement, and promotes exceptional performance. As a direct result, this results in increased levels of job satisfaction and employee retention. When it comes to a business performance perspective, an environment that nurtures talent and encourages growth leads to a more agile, effective, and adaptive workforce, enabling an organization to thrive in an ever-changing market. The Employee Growth Rate serves as an insightful measure of an organization’s dedication to cultivating a learning organization. Paying close attention to this metric and taking data-driven, empathetic actions reflects an organization’s commitment to its people, ultimately ensuring that it stays on a path of continuous growth. Embracing the Employee Growth Rate is a testament to an organization’s focus on competency-based learning, its appreciation for individual aspirations, and its unwavering pursuit of sustained business performance. Retention Rates In a world where employees are the linchpin of business success, Retention Rates serve as a crucial HR metric. This metric quantifies how well a company retains its employees over a period, effectively revealing insights into job satisfaction levels and the overall company culture. Keeping a keen eye on Retention Rates is central to the sustained effectiveness of a learning organization. Retention Rates are more than just numbers. They are indicative of an organization’s ability to maintain a competent, motivated workforce. High retention rates usually point towards positive job satisfaction and a supportive company culture. On the contrary, low retention rates may signal potential challenges that need to be addressed. These could include aspects related to competency-based learning, compensation, employee engagement, or opportunities for growth and development. Studying Retention Rates enables HR professionals and business leaders to identify areas of improvement within the organization. These insights guide decision-making processes around recruitment, onboarding, training, rewards, and recognition systems. An organization that thrives on high retention rates is likely to have a team of committed employees on board, willing to contribute to improved business performance. Such an organization tends to exude a positive ambiance, advantageous for its reputation as an employer, and its customer relationships. In a nutshell, Retention Rates are a vital health check of an organization. They portray how effectively an organization cultivates a climate of employee satisfaction and continuous growth, in line with principles of a learning organization. By focusing on Retention Rates, businesses can significantly influence competency-based learning, drive enhanced employee job satisfaction, and sculpt an empowering company culture, all of which are essentials for elevated business performance. Employee Performance Metrics At the heart of a successful business are its employees and their performance. Employee Performance Metrics offer a systematic lens to evaluate individual productivity and effectiveness. By providing a measure of an employee’s contributions and accomplishments, these metrics serve as an essential tool to comprehend and enhance workforce capabilities, a critical aspect of any learning organization. The scope of Employee Performance Metrics is broad and multifaceted, capturing a spectrum of data points such as quality and quantity of work, adherence to deadlines, job knowledge, and innovation. By providing clear and accurate information of individual employee contributions, these metrics aid HR professionals and business leaders in decision-making processes. They shed light on areas for improvement, identify potentials for promotion, and inform strategies for competency-based learning initiatives. The power of these metrics extends beyond individual employees and has the capacity to transform the entire organization. A workforce that is regularly assessed and guided using performance metrics is more likely to be engaged, motivated, and productive. This engagement and productivity directly impact the operational efficiency of the organization, contributing to enhanced business performance. Employee Performance Metrics provide valuable insights into an organization’s most valuable asset, its people. By focusing on these metrics, organizations can create a proactive workforce, inspire continued learning, and drive performance growth, making them an indispensable feature of a well-functioning learning organization. They are the lynchpin that ties individual performance to competency-based learning and business performance, creating a synergetic environment that benefits employees and organizations alike. Summary Summary For HR leaders and organizational leaders, understanding a variety of key HR metrics is nothing short of essential. By successfully interpreting and actioning the insights from these 19 HR metrics, decision-makers equip themselves with the knowledge to effectively manage and enhance multiple areas of their human resource initiatives. These metrics not only help in shaping a productive and content workforce but also contribute tangibly to an organization’s future success. Diving deep into employee satisfaction, organizations must adopt a systematic approach to gauge the happiness and well-being of their workforce. By accurately capturing the significance of various factors that influence satisfaction, HR metrics enable organizational leaders to make informed decisions, fostering an uplifting workplace atmosphere where employees feel acknowledged, motivated, and valued. Retention rates, on the other hand, hold a mirror to the overall company culture, illuminating aspects that may need improvement, or areas that are flourishing. Consequently, these metrics facilitate effective action plans that drive harmonious cultures and stable employee longevity. The connection between a satisfied employee base and an efficient workforce highlights the core importance of retaining human capital for success in any business. In conclusion, comprehending and leveraging these key HR metrics is an indispensable requirement for building a robust and thriving organization that stands the test of time. HR teams, armed with these insights, play a crucial role in weaving together a genuinely outstanding company tapestry. By nurturing employees through informed, empathetic decisions, organizations can strengthen the foundations of their workforce, ensuring long-lasting success sustained by satisfied, productive, and fulfilled employees.
    资讯
    2023年12月10日
  • 资讯
    就业报告证实劳动力市场需求降温,美联储不会在12月13日会议上加息。宽松政策可能会在 2024 年中期开始 世界大型企业联合会高级经济学家Selcuk Eren对今日美国劳工统计局就业形势报告的评论 就业报告支持美联储所期望的消费放缓、通胀和劳动力市场三重奏 纽约, 2023 年 12 月 8 日/美通社/ -- 今天的就业报告显示劳动力市场正在降温,这与美联储降低通胀的愿望一致。11 月份非农就业人数总计增加 199,000 人。不包括罢工工人的回归,就业人数增加了 158,000 人。10 月份的就业增长未修正,但 9 月份的增长第三次下调,使三个月就业增长达到 204,000 人,大大低于年初的水平(1 月份为 334,000 人)。 11 月份新增就业岗位大部分仍来自劳动力严重短缺的三个行业:医疗保健和社会保险、休闲和酒店以及政府。在汽车工人 (UAW) 和好莱坞(SAG-AFTRA) 罢工得到解决后,制造业和信息工作岗位也出现激增。大多数其他行业本月持平或负增长。我们预计 2024 年上半年工资增长将继续放缓并变为负值。 随着消费者支出增长放缓、劳动力市场供需趋于平衡、总体和核心消费者价格通胀放缓,我们预计美联储不会在12月13日会议上加息。宽松政策可能会在 2024 年中期开始。 就业报告证实劳动力市场需求降温 11 月份就业报告与本周发布的其他数据一致,表明劳动力需求正在放缓。JOLTS 数据中的职位空缺 继续下降。就业报告显示,11 月份工资增速同比从 4.1% 放缓至 4.0%,因为 JOLTS 数据中的辞职率现已回到疫情前的水平。工作转换是工资上涨的主要推动力。 非农就业报告显示,失业率从3.9%下降至3.7%,反映出就业人数增加和失业人数减少。失业率自今年早些时候以来普遍上升,这与持续申请失业救济人数的稳步上升是一致的。尽管如此,失业率仍然处于历史低位,因为在我们的美国首席执行官信心调查中,很少有大公司的首席执行官(13%) 打算裁员,而 49% 的公司计划留住工人。NFIB 调查中的小企业也几乎没有增加就业的计划。最终,2024年失业率可能升至4.3%。 婴儿潮一代的退休限制了劳动力供应,加剧了劳动力短缺 整体劳动力参与率从 10 月份的 62.7% 上升至 11 月份的 62.8%,明显低于疫情前的水平。16-64岁人群的劳动力参与率继续提高,参与率从10月的74.9%升至11月的75.1%,比2020年2月的水平高1.4个百分点(图2)。然而,65 岁及以上人群仍持观望态度,参与率从 10 月的 19.0% 上升至 11 月的 19.3%,仍比2020 年 2 月低 1.3 个百分点。 65岁以上群体劳动力参与率持续疲软的主要原因是疫情后退休水平高于预期。与2020 年 2 月相比,因退休而未加入劳动力市场的人数增加了近 480 万人。即使没有加速退休,一大批人退出劳动力市场预计也会导致劳动力短缺持续下去。 劳动力短缺可能会导致工资增长加快,从而导致通胀上升。在此背景下,雇主可以考虑为老年工人提供激励措施,以延长工作时间或重返劳动力市场。年长工人往往更喜欢兼职工作,这表明灵活的工作时间和工作地点 是吸引和留住 65 岁以上年龄组工人的重要决定因素。 消息来源:世界大型企业联合会
    资讯
    2023年12月08日
  • 1... 1011121314 17 跳转至